Advertisement

Environmental Economics and Policy Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 121–149 | Cite as

Some implications of environmental regulation on social welfare under learning-by-doing of eco-products

  • Koji KotaniEmail author
  • Makoto Kakinaka
Research Article

Abstract

This paper examines the significance of environmental regulation in an economy where an eco-product supplied by a single producer is differentiated from a conventional product generating negative externalities. We develop two types of the model: one is a static model without learning effect of eco-product planning, and the other is a dynamic model with learning effect. We show that the regulation should be adopted when the marginal cost of the eco-product production is high enough in a static setting. In a dynamic model, however, whether the regulation improves social welfare is dependent not only on current marginal costs of the eco-product, but also on the degree of dynamic learning effect. Particularly, the regulation could improve social welfare when learning effect is either small or large enough, while it could deteriorate social welfare in an intermediate case. Although intuitions tell us that the value of the regulation appears to be monotonically increasing in learning effect, our results suggest that the value possesses a nonmonotone U-shaped feature with respect to learning effect. The optimal decision of the regulation in a dynamic setting could be converse to that of a static setting, providing important policy implications of learning potentials.

Keywords

Eco-product Environmental regulation Product differentiation Learning-by-doing 

References

  1. Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 7:2–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Manag Sci 36:140–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247:920–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arora S, Gangopadhyay S (1995) Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance. J Environ Econ Manag 28:289–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29:155–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bansal S, Gangopadhyay S (2003) Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers. J Environ Econ Manag 45:333–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1988) The theory of environmental policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellas AS (1998) Empirical evidence of advances in scrubber technology. Resour Energy Econ 20:327–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benkard C (2000) Learning and forgetting: the dynamics of aircraft production. Am Econ Rev 90:1034–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Besanko D, Doraszelski U, Kryukov Y (2014) The economics of predation: what drives pricing when there is learning-by-doing? Am Econ Rev 104:868–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conrad K (2005) Price competition and product differentiation when consumers care for the environment. Environ Resour Econ 31:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cremer H, Thisse J (1999) On the taxation of polluting products in a differentiated industry. Eur Econ Rev 43:575–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cropper ML, Oates WE (1999) Environmental economics. In: Stavins RN (ed) Economics of the environment, selected readings. W. W. Norton & Company Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Eriksson C (2004) Can green consumerism replace environmental regulation? A differentiated-products example. Resour Energy Econ 26:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1983) Learning-by-doing and market performance. Bell J Econ 14:522–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fujii H, Managi S (2015) Optimal production resource reallocation for \({\rm CO}_{2}\) emissions reduction in manufacturing sectors. Glob Environ Change 35:505–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goulder LH, Mathai K (2000) Optimal \(\text{ CO }_{2}\) abatement in the presence of induced technological change. J Environ Econ Manag 39:1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grankvist G, Dahlstrand U, Biel A (2004) The impcat of environmental labelling on consumer preference: negative vs. positive labels. J Consum Policy 27:213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenstone M (2003) Estimating regulation-induced substitution: the effect of the clean air act on water and ground pollution. Am Econ Rev 93:442–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hatase K, Managi S (2015) Increase in carbon prices: analysis of energy-economy modeling. Environ Econ Policy Stud 17:241–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jorgenson DW, Wilcoxen PJ (1990) Environmental regulation and U.S. economic growth. RAND J Econ 22:41–69Google Scholar
  22. Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (2012) Dynamic optimization: the calculus of variations and optimal control in economics and management. Elsevier, North HollandGoogle Scholar
  23. Kolstad CC (2010) Environmental economics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Loureiro ML, Mccluskey JJ, Mittelhammer RC (2002) Will consumers pay a premium for eco-labeled apples? J Consum Affair 36:203–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Managi S, Opaluch JJ, Jin D, Grigalunas TA (2005) Environmental regulations and technological change in the offshore oil and gas industry. Land Econ 81:303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ministry of Environment Government of Japan (2006a). Kankyo HakushoGoogle Scholar
  27. Ministry of Environment Government of Japan (2006b) List of Environmental Quality Standards in Japan. http://www.env.go.jp/en/standards/
  28. Miravete EJ (2003) Time-consistent protection with learning-by-doing. Eur Econ Rev 47:761–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moraga-Gonzalez JL, Padron-Fumero N (2002) Environmental policy in a green market. Environ Resour Econ 22:419–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oates WE, Portney PR, McGartland AM (1989) The net benefit of incentive-based regulation: a case study of environmental standard setting. Am Econ Rev 79:1233–1242Google Scholar
  31. Oikawa K, Managi S (2015) R&D in clean technology: a project choice model with learning. J Econ Behav Org 117:175–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palmer K, Oates WE, Portney PR (1995) Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm. J Econ Perspect 9:119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Porter ME (1991) America’s green strategy. Sci Am 264:168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment–competitive relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94:1002–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sakamoto T, Managi S (2015) Optimal economic growth and energy policy: analysis of nonrenewable and renewable energy. Environ Econ Policy Stud (Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  37. Singh N, Vives X (1984) Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND J Econ 15:545–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spence MA (1981) The learning curve and competition. Bell J Econ 12:49–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stokey NL (1988) Learning by doing and the introduction of new goods. J Polit Econ 96:701–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stranlund JK (1997) Public technological aid to support compliance to environmental standards. J Environ Econ Manag 34:228–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhu J, Ruth M (2015) Relocation or reallocation: impacts of differentiated energy saving regulation on manufacturing industries in China. Ecol Econ 110:119–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies and Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementKochi University of TechnologyKochi-shiJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of International RelationsInternational University of JapanMinami-UonumaJapan

Personalised recommendations