Environmental Economics and Policy Studies

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 1–19 | Cite as

Reducing CO2 emissions of Japanese thermal power companies: a directional output distance function approach

Research Article

Abstract

This article examines the thermal power generation efficiency of ten Japanese electric power companies and the shadow prices of carbon dioxide (CO2) by employing a directional output distance function (DODF) with panel data for 1990–2011. We find that the shadow price of CO2 varies greatly between US$1.49 and US$288.82, depending on the company’s production strategy concerning energy supply and CO2 emissions. These shadow prices give us clues to understand how the electric power companies may respond to environmental regulations, such as environmental tax and emission trading systems. According to the DODF, an additional 53571 GWh of electricity could have been generated in 2011 at the cost of an increase of 40105 thousand tonnes of CO2, if the companies would have operated efficiently giving little consideration to CO2 emissions reduction. These increases are equivalent to 8.77 and 9.18 % of total electricity and CO2 emissions, respectively, from the ten electric power companies in 2011. On the other hand, if the companies would have operated efficiently and given first priority to CO2 emissions reduction, a further 58002 thousand tonnes of CO2, equivalent to 13.28 % of their total CO2 emissions in 2011, could have been reduced as a whole.

Keywords

Directional output distance function Japan Efficiency of thermal power generation Shadow price of CO2 

JEL Classification

D20 Q40 Q54 

References

  1. Aigner DJ, Chu SF (1968) On estimating the industry production function. Am Econ Rev 58:826–839Google Scholar
  2. Azuma A (2012) CO2 abatement in the Japanese power sector. Rev Environ Econ Policy Stud 5(2):46–57Google Scholar
  3. Bank of Japan (2012) Price indexes annual. http://www.boj.or.jp/en/statistics/pub/pim/index.htm
  4. Coggins JS, Swinton JR (1996) The price of pollution: a dual approach to valuing SO2 allowances. J Environ Econ Manage 30:58–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ecofys (2011) International comparison of fossil power efficiency and CO2 intensity. http://www.ecofys.com/files/files/ecofys_2011_international_comparison_fossil_power_efficiency.pdf
  6. Ellerman AD, Tsukada N (2001) CO2 abatement by multi-fueled electric utilities: an analysis based on Japanese data. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, 76, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Knox Lovell CA, Yaisawarng S (1993) Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: a distance function approach. Rev Econ Stat 75:374–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Weber WL (2006) Shadow prices and pollution costs in U.S. agriculture. Ecol Econ 56:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Färe R, Martins-Filho C, Vardanyan M (2010) On functional form representation of multi-output production technology. J Prod Anal 33:81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujii H, Iwate K, Kaneko S, Managi S (2013) Corporate environmental and economic performances of Japanese manufacturing firms: empirical study for sustainable development. Bus Strat Environ 22(3):187–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta M (2006) Costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a case study of India’s power generation sector. Fondazione Eni Enrico Matti, Nota di lavoro, p 147Google Scholar
  12. Hudgins LB, Primont D (2007) Derivative properties of directional technology distance functions. In: Färe R, Grosskopf S, Primont D (eds) Aggregation, efficiency, and measurement. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2012) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion—highlights, 2012 ednGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaraitė J, Maria CD (2012) Efficiency, productivity and environmental policy: a case study of power generation in the EU. Energ Econ 34(5):1557–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kwon OS, Yun WC (1999) Estimation of the marginal abatement costs of airborne pollutants in Korea’s power generation sector. Energ Econ 21:547–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee M, Zhang N (2012) Technical efficiency, shadow price of carbon dioxide emissions, and substitutability for energy in the Chinese manufacturing industries. Energ Econ 34(5):1492–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matsushita K, Yamane F (2012) Pollution from the electric power sector in Japan and efficient pollution reduction. Energ Econ 34(4):1124–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2012a) http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/denkihp/genjo/seido.pdf
  19. Ministry of the Environment (2011a) http://www.env.go.jp/earth/ondanka/det/jvets.html
  20. Ministry of the Environment (2011b) http://www.env.go.jp/policy/tax/kento.html
  21. Morris J, Paltsev S, Reilly J (2012) Marginal abatement costs and marginal welfare costs for greenhouse gas emissions reductions: results from the EPPA model. Environ Model Assess 17(4):325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakano M, Managi S (2008) Regulatory reforms and productivity: an empirical analysis of the Japanese electricity industry. Energ Policy 36(1):201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakano M, Managi S (2010) Productivity analysis with CO2 emissions in Japan. Pac Econ Rev 15(5):708–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Park H, Lim J (2009) Valuation of marginal CO2 abatement options for electric power plants in Korea. Energ Policy 37:1834–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rezek JP, Campbell RC (2007) Cost estimates for multiple pollutants: a maximum entropy approach. Energ Econ 29:503–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shephard RW (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  27. Tanaka K, Matsukawa I, Managi S (2012) A study of electricity industry reform and security of supply with a data envelopment analysis. J Soc Econ Res 60:39–48 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  28. The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan (2012a) Environmental action plan by the Japanese electric utility industry. http://www.fepc.or.jp/english/library/environmental_action_plan/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2013/03/27/actionplan_E_2012.pdf
  29. The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan (2012b) Electricity statistical information. http://www.fepc.or.jp/library/data/tokei/index.html
  30. Vardanyan M, Noh DW (2006) Approximating the cost of pollution abatement via alternative specifications of a multi-output production technology: a case of the U.S. electric utility industry. J Environ Manage 80:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang Q, Cui Q, Zhou D, Wang S (2011) Marginal abatement costs of carbon dioxide in China: a nonparametric analysis. Energy Procedia 5:2316–2320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang Q, Zhou P, Zhou D (2012) Efficiency measurement with carbon dioxide emissions: the case of China. Appl Energy 90(1):161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsShiga UniversityHikoneJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Human and Environmental StudiesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations