Annals of Vascular Surgery

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 526–529 | Cite as

Symptomatic Subclavian Vein Stenosis and Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients with Transvenous Pacemakers

  • Theodore H. Teruya
  • Ahmed M. Abou-Zamzam Jr
  • Whitney Limm
  • Linda Wong
  • Livingston Wong
Original Article


The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and timing of complications associated with ipsilateral transvenous pacemakers and hemodialysis access, including subclavian vein stenosis and occlusion, and assess their impact on dialysis access patency. All patients who had pacemakers placed at St. Francis Medical Center were reviewed during the 10-year period from 1988 to 1998. Patients requiring chronic hemodialysis were identified and their demographic data, the presence of arm swelling, and fistula patency were noted. Development of subclavian vein stenosis and occlusion was documented by venography in symptomatic patients. The ultimate outcome of dialysis access was recorded. During the 10-year period 495 patients had transvenous pacemakers placed. Twenty patients were identified with renal failure requiring hemodialysis and 14 had hemodialysis access in the extremity ipsilateral to the pacemaker. Ten (10/14, 71%) patients developed symptoms of subclavian stenosis, including venous hypertension, high recirculation rate, arm swelling, pain, and neurologic symptoms. Eighty percent (8/10) of symptomatic patients had subclavian vein occlusion. All 10 symptomatic patients required ligation of the hemodialysis access to control symptoms. The four asymptomatic patients expired within 6 months of placement of the pacemaker or hemodialysis access from unrelated causes. There is a high incidence of complications in patients who have ipsilateral pacemakers and hemodialysis access. The presence of pacemaker electrodes in the subclavian vein and the flow associated with hemodialysis may accelerate the occurrence of subclavian venous stenosis and occlusion. Patients who did not develop symptoms may have expired before venous outflow obstruction could develop. Vascular surgeons and cardiac surgeons/cardiologists need to coordinate their procedures to avoid ipsilateral transvenous pacemakers and hemodialysis access.


  1. 1.
    Schwab, SJ, Quarles, LD, Middleton, JP,  et al. 1988Hemodialysis-associated subclavian vein stenosis.Kidney Int3311561159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stoney, WS, Addlestone, RB, Alford, WC Jr,  et al. 1976The incidence of venous thrombosis following long-term transvenous pacing.Ann Thorac Surg22166170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zuber, M, Huber, P, Fricker, U,  et al. 1998Assessment of the subclavian vein in patients with transvenous pacemaker leads.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol2126212630PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schillinger, F, Schillinger, D, Montagnac, R, Milcent, T 1991Post-catheterisation vein stenosis in haemodialysis: comparative angiographic study of 50 subclavian and 50 internal jugular access.Nephrol Dial Transplant6722724PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cimochowski, GE, Worley, E, Rutherford, WE, Sartain, J, Blondin, J, Harter, H 1990Superiority of the internal jugular over the subclavian access for temporary dialysis.Nephron54154161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nishino, M, Tanouchi, J, Ito, T,  et al. 1997Echographic detection of latent severe thrombotic stenosis of the superior vena cava and innominate vein in patients with a pacemaker: integrated diagnosis using sonography, pulse Doppler, and color flow.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol20946952PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Antonelli, D, Turgeman, Y, Kaveh, Z,  et al. 1989Short-term thrombosis after transvenous permanent pacemaker insertion.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol120280282Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spittell, PC, Vlietstra, RE, Hayes, DL, Higano, ST 1990Venous obstruction due to permanent transvenous pacemaker electrodes: treatment with percutaneous transluminal balloon venoplasty.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol13271274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferguson, R, McCaughan, B, May, J, Waugh, R 1992Venous occlusion: a rare complication of transvenous cardiac pacing.Aust N Z J Surg62977980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leman, RB, Kratz, JM, Gazes, PC 1985Permanent cardiac pacing in patients on chronic renal dialysis.Am Heart J11012421244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Korzets, A, Chagnac, A, Ori, Y,  et al. 1991Subclavian vein stenosis, permanent cardiac pacemakers and the haemodialysed patient.Nephron580103105Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Konner, K, Vorwerk, D 1997Permanent pacemaker wires causing subclavian vein stenosis in presence of AV fistula—is it ever wrong to try angioplasty and stenting?.Nephrol Dial Transplant1217351738CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chuang, CL, Tarng, DC, Yang, WC, Huang, TP 2001An occult cause of arteriovenous access failure: central vein stenosis from permanent pacemaker wire. Report of three cases and review of the literature.Am J Nephrol21406409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cavatorta, F, Campisi, S, Zollo, A 1997Subclavian vein stenosis: a potentially serious complication in chronic hemodialysis patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers.Int J Artif Organs20316318PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodore H. Teruya
    • 1
  • Ahmed M. Abou-Zamzam Jr
    • 1
  • Whitney Limm
    • 2
  • Linda Wong
    • 2
  • Livingston Wong
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Vascular SurgeryLoma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CAUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgerySt. Francis Medical Center and University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HIUSA

Personalised recommendations