Revealing the existence of the ontological commitment in fish schools

Artificial Life and Robotics volume 25, pages633–642(2020)Cite this article

Abstract

The heap paradox is an enduring problem in complex systems, and it has many variations. One variation of the heap paradox considers how many parts of a whole are required to generate group behaviour. The initial heap paradox indicates that the recursive adding grain process finally makes a heap at a certain point. In this study, we point out the hidden assumption of this paradox, which a recursive operation involves ontological commitment (i.e. anticipation for the forthcoming heap from non-heap in every procedure). The aim of this study is to show the existence of the ontological commitment in a real fish school via IIT 3.0. We analysed the behaviour of Plecoglossus altivelis with group sizes ranging from 2 to 5 fish. Consequently, the subschool embedded in the whole group has a qualitatively different causal structure compared with a whole group of the same size. That is, 2-fish subschools lose the chasing property, but gain the leadership property, which has never been observed in a 2-fish whole school. Accordingly, 3- and 4-fish subschools also show a completely different property from the same sized whole school. Our results suggest that a real fish school contains the ontological commitment to maintain their group behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Buhl J, Sumpter D, Couzin I, Hale J, Despland E, Miller E et al (2006) From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science 312(5778):1402–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cavagna A, Cimarelli A, Giardina I, Parisi G, Santagati R, Stefanini F et al (2010) Scale-free correlations in starling flocks. PNAS 107(26):11865–11870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Attanasi A, Cavagna A, Castello D, Giardina I, Melillo S, Parisi L et al (2014) Finite-size scaling as a way to probe near-criticality in natural swarms. Phys Rev Lett 113:238102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Couzin ID, Ioannou CC, Demirel G, Gross T, Torney CJ, Hartnett A, Conradt L, Levin SA, Leonard NE (2011) Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups. Science 334(6062):1578–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Berdahl A, Torney CJ, Ioannou C, Faria J, Couzin I (2013) Emergent sensing of complex environments by mobile animal groups. Science 339(6119):574–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gautrais J, Ginelli F, Fournier R, Blanco S, Soria M, Chaté H et al (2012) Deciphering interactions in moving animal groups. PLoS Computat Biol 8(9):e1002678

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Niizato T, Murakami H, Sangu K, Tomaru T, Sonoda K, Nishiyama Y et al (2017) Local perspectives of Plecoglossus altivelis determine searching strategy. In: AIP conference proceedings

  8. 8.

    Katz Y, Tunstrom K, Ioannou CC, Huepe C, Couzin ID (2011) Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish. PNAS 108(46):18720–18725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Collignon B, Séguret A, Chemtob Y, Cazenille L, Halloy J (2019) Collective departures and leadership in zebrafish. PLoS ONE 14(5):e0216798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bak P, Tang C, Wiesenfeld K (1987) Self-organized criticality: an explanation of 1/f noise. Phys Rev Lett 59(4):381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Frette V, Christensen K, Malthe-Sorensen A, Feder J, Jossang T, Meakin P (1996) Avalanche dynamics in a pile of rice. Nature 379:49–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Olfati-Saber R (2006) Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory. IEEE Trans Autom Control 51(3):401–420

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Oizumi M, Albantakis L, Tononi G (2014) From the phenomenology to the mechanisms of consciousness: integrated information theory 3.0. PLoS Computat Biol 10(5):e1003588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mayner W, Marshall W, Albantakis L, Findlay G, Marchman R, Tononi G (2018) PyPhi: a toolbox for integrated information theory. PLoS Comput Biol 14(7):e1006343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Albantakis L, Marshall W, Hoel E, Tononi G (2019) What caused what? A quantitative account of actual causation using dynamical causal networks. Entropy 21:459

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lombardi O, López C (2018) What does ‘information’ mean in integrated information theory? Entropy 20:894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Niizato T, Sakamoto K, Mototake Y, Murakami H, Tomaru T, Hoshika T, Fukushima T (2020a) Finding continuity and discontinuity in fish schools via integrated information theory. PLoS ONE 15(2):e0229573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Niizato T, Sakamoto K, Mototake Y, Murakami H, Tomaru T, Hoshika T, Fukushima T (2020b) Four-types of IIT-induced group integrity of Plecoglossus altivelis. Entropy 22:726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bertalanffy L (1969) General system theory: foundations, development, applications, Revised. George Braziller, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Attanasi A, Cavagna A, Del Castello L, Giardina I, Jelic A, Melillo S, Parisi L, Pohl O, Shen E, Viale V (2015) Emergence of collective changes in travel direction of starling flocks from individual birds’ fluctuations. J R Soc Interface 12:20150319

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Information and Systems, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

    Takayuki Niizato & Toshiki Fukushima

  2. Leading Graduate School Doctoral Program in Human Biology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

    Kotaro Sakamoto

  3. Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Yoh-ichi Mototake

  4. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Hisashi Murakami

  5. Faculty of Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Japan

    Yuta Nishiyama

Authors
  1. Takayuki Niizato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kotaro Sakamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoh-ichi Mototake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hisashi Murakami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuta Nishiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Toshiki Fukushima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayuki Niizato.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niizato, T., Sakamoto, K., Mototake, Yi. et al. Revealing the existence of the ontological commitment in fish schools. Artif Life Robotics 25, 633–642 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-020-00658-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • The paradox of the heap
  • Collective behaviour
  • Integrated information theory 3.0