Advertisement

An improvement of flight performance in the level flight of tilted quadrotors by attaching a fixed-wing

  • Yoshikazu NakamuraEmail author
  • Atsushi Arakawa
  • Keigo Watanabe
  • Isaku Nagai
Original Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Wide range information is required to be collected by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and the area for its take-off and landing is limited in the event of a disaster. Therefore, research on the development of a specific UAV, which has two functions of a long distance flight like a fixed-wing aircraft and of a hovering like a rotorcraft, is drawing attention recently. In this study, we focus on a hybrid tilted quadrotor, in which four rotors are tiltable and a wing is fixed. It is clarified, from a simulation comparison in a level flight mode, that the flight performance is effectively improved by adding a fixed-wing, where a tilted quadrotor is assumed to take a level flight by using a controller for a vertical-flight mode and by controlling the angles of some tiltable rotors. It is shown finally that adding a fixed-wing can save the rotor thrust about 77% per flight distance.

Keywords

UAV Quadrotor Tilt rotor Fixed-wing 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Naser MH, Miloud B, Tarik T (2017) UAV-based IoT platform: a crowd surveillance use case. IEEE Commun Mag 55:128–134Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suzuki T, Meguro J, Amano Y, Hashizume T, Kubo D, Tsuchiya T, Suzuki S, Hirokawa R, Tatsumi K, Sato K, Takiguchi J (2008) Development of information collecting system using a small unmanned aerial vehicle for disaster prevention and mitigation. J Robot Soc Jpn 26:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sato A (2016) The history and future of industrial use unmanned helicopter. J Robot Soc Jpn 34:113–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suzuki S (2016) Technical and institutional directions for the safe use of small unmanned aircraft. J Robot Soc Jpn 34:24–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ro K, OH J, Dong L (2007) Lessons learned: application of small UAV for urban highway traffic monitoring. In: 45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibitGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matsumoto T, Kita K, Suzuki R, Oosedo A, Go K, Hoshino Y, Konno A, Uchiyama M (2010) A hovering control strategy for a tail-sitter VTOL UAV that increases stability against large disturbance. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 54–59Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watanabe K, Izumi K (2006) On the controllability of rotor-type flying robots: why is the drive of four rotors effective for X4-Flyer? In: Proceedings of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers System Integration (SICE SI 7th), pp 820–821Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oosedo A, Abiko S, Narasaki S, Kuno A, Konno A, Uchiyama M (2014) Position and attitude independent flight control of 4 tilt-rotor UAV. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Robotics Society of Japan, p RSJ2014AC3M1-01Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arakawa A, Hasegawa T, Watanabe K, Nagai I (2018) Control of attitude angle for a tilted quadrotor. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation (ICMA 2018), pp 1844–1849Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Young LA, Ailen EW, Johnson JL, Demblewski R, Andrews J, Klem J (2002) New concepts and perspectives on micro-rotorcraft and small autonomous rotary-wing vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 20th AIAA applied aerodynamics conferenceGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oosedo A, Konno A, Masuko K, Koizumi T, Uchiyama M (2012) Hovering control of quad rotor tail-sitter unmanned aerial vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 2012 JSME conference on robotics and mechatronics, pp 2A1-H10(1)–2A1-H10(4)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oner KT, Centugru E, Unel M, Aksit MF, Kandemir I, Gulez K (2008) Dynamic model and control of a new quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle with tilt-wing mechanism. Int J Aerosp Mech Eng 2(9):1008–1013Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takeuchi R, Watanabe K, Nagai I (2017) Development and control of tilt-wings for a tilt-type quadrotor. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation, pp 501–506Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zou J-T, Pan Z-Y (2016) The development of tilt-rotor undammed aerial vehicle. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng 40:909–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nakamura Y, Watanabe K, Nagai I (2015) Control of a quadrotor equipped with a fixed-wing by tilting some of four rotors. In: Proceeding of The 2nd international symposium on smart material and mechatronics 2015, pp 31–35Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    UIUC Applied Aerodynamics Group NACA 4412 (naca4412-il) Xfoil prediction polar at RE = 200,000 Ncrit = 9. Airfoil tools. http://airfoiltools.com/polar/details?polar=xf-naca4412-il-200000. Accessed 9 Sep 2018
  17. 17.
    Komoriya S (2012) Chapter 63: drag coefficient of cylinders and other shapes. Welcome to Higashitokorozawa 2-31-12 HOMEPAGE!!. http://skomo.o.oo7.jp/f28/hp28_63.htm. Accessed 25 Sep 2018

Copyright information

© International Society of Artificial Life and Robotics (ISAROB) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshikazu Nakamura
    • 1
    Email author
  • Atsushi Arakawa
    • 1
  • Keigo Watanabe
    • 1
  • Isaku Nagai
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Natural Science and TechnologyOkayama UniversityOkayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations