Advertisement

Dynamically evolving algorithm for minimizing the energy consumption of a manipulator

  • Yoshio Yokose
Original Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Global warming and environmental destruction are caused, in part by the mass consumption of energy by industries that use robotic manipulators. Many trajectories planning of the manipulators are determined by giving priority to the operation efficiency such as the operating time and controllability. And it may not be taking the consumption energy into consideration in the trajectory planning. The minimization of the energy under the equation of motion of the manipulator can be reduced to a two-point boundary value problem. This problem can be solved analytically if the equation of motion is linear. However, the equation of motion of a two-links manipulator is non-linear. This paper describes an application of the genetic algorithm based evolution strategy to solve minimizing the consumption energy of a manipulator with non-linear friction at the joints. When applying the genetic algorithm, it is necessary to define the relation between trajectory functions and genes. Fourier cosine series with Mth order are used in this paper. In this minimization problem of the consumption energy, there are many local minimum points due to the non-linearity. A major topic of this paper is to discuss the number of M to increase the accuracy of the solution without falling into the local minimum point. This paper has proposed to change M in the progress of evolution.

Keywords

Manipulator Evolution strategy Genetic algorithm Two-point boundary value problem Consumption energy 

References

  1. 1.
    Abe Akira, Sasamori Kazunori (2010) Optimal trajectory planning for a flexible manipulator. Trans Soc Instrum Control Eng 46(2):130–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harada Kensuke (2014) Optimization in robot motion planing. J Robot Soc Jpn 32(6):508–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abe Akira, Nemoto Shota (2012) An energy saving feedforward control technique for a 2-DOF flexible manipulator. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng C 78(789):1325–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sato Asaji, Sato Osamu, Kono Michio, Kai Keiko (2003) Trajectory for saving energy of direct-drive manipulator with two degree of freedom in FTP motion under gravity. Jpn Soc Precis Eng 69(9):1281–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Izumi Teruyuki (2000) Path planning for saving energy of a manipulator in PTP motions. J Robot Soc Jpn 18(7):972–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Izumi Teruyuki (1995) Minimization of energy consumption for a manipulator with nonlinear friction in PTP motion. J Robot Soc Jpn 13(8):1179–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Izumi Teruyuki (2000) Path planning for saving energy of a manipulator in PTP motion. J Robot Soc Jpn 18(7):972–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohammed OA, Uler GF (1997) A hybrid technique for the optimal design of electromagnetic devices using direct search and genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Magn 33(2):1931–1934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yokose Y, Izumi T (2003) Application of genetic algorithms for minimizing the consumption energy of a manipulator. Proc 8th Int Symp Artif Life Robot 1:50–53Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yokose Yoshio (2017) Trajectory planning for a manipulator with nonlinear Coulomb friction using a dynamically incremental genetic algorithm. J Artif Life Robot 22(1):31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAROB 2018
corrected publication 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Science, National Institute of TechnologyKure CollegeKureJapan

Personalised recommendations