Advertisement

Artificial Life and Robotics

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 540–546 | Cite as

Biomimetic pupils for augmenting eye emulation in humanoid robots

  • Carl Strathearn
  • Minhua Ma
Original Article

Abstract

Contemporary approaches in the development of humanoid robots continually neglect holistic nuances, particularly in ocular prosthetic design. The standard solid glass and acrylic eye construction techniques implemented in humanoid robot design present the observer with an inaccurate representation of the natural human eye by utilising hardened synthetic materials which prohibit pupillary dynamics. Precise eye emulation is an essential factor in the development of a greater realistic humanoid robot as misrepresentation in ocular form and function will appear distinctly prevalent during proximity face to face communication as eye contact is the primary form of interpersonal communicative processing. This paper explores a new material approach in the development of a more accurate humanoid robotic eye construction by employing natural compounds similar in structure to that found in the organic human eye to replace the traditional glass and acrylic modelling techniques. Furthermore, this paper identifies a gap in current ocular system design as no robotic eye model can accurately replicate all the natural operations of the human iris simultaneously in reaction to light and emotive responsivity. This paper offers a new system design approach to augment future humanoid robot eye construction towards achieving a greater accurate and naturalistic eye emulation.

Keywords

Humanoid robotics The uncanny valley Artificial muscle Human/computer interaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Hanson D (2005) Expanding the aesthetic possibilities for humanoid robots. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download. Accessed 8 Apr 2008
  2. 2.
    Tondu B, Bardou N (2009) Aesthetics and robotics: which form to give to the human-like robot, world academy of science, engineering and technology. Int J Hum Soc Sci 3(10):1936–1943Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sejima Y, Egawa S, Okamoto D, Sato Y, Wantanbe T (2016) Pupiloid: Development of a pupil response robot for emotional expression.  In: The Proceedings of JSME annual conference on robotics and mechatronics (Robomec), 2016 June 08–2016 June 11, pp. 35–42.  https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmermd.2016.2P1-12a2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prendergast KW, Reed TJ (199) Simulator eye dilation device. Publication number. US5900923. http://www.google.co.uk/patents/US5900923. Accessed 9 Apr 2017
  5. 5.
    Schnuckle G (2006) Expressive eye with dilating and constricting pupils. Publication Number US 7485025B2: https://www.google.com/patents/US7485025. Accessed 9 Apr 17
  6. 6.
    Mathot S, Stigchel VS (2015) New light on the mind’s eye. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 24(5):374–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breedon JP, Lowrie PJ (2013) Lifelike prosthetic eye: the call for smart materials. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 8(04):135–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zeng H, Wani M, Wasylczyk P, Kaczmarek R, Priimagi A (2017) Self-regulating iris based on light-actuated liquid crystal elastomer. J Adv Mater 29(3):90–97Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lapointe J, Boisvert J, Kashyap R (2016) Next generation artificial eyes with dynamic iris. Int J Ophthalmol Clin Res 3(3):1–10. (ISSN: 2378-346X) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lapointe J, Durette JF, Shaat A, Boulos PR, Kashyap R (2010) A ‘living’ prosthetic iris. Macmillan Publishers: Eye 24:1716–1723Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shah MR, Coutinho I, Chitre V, Aras AM (2013) The ocular prosthesis: a novel technique using digital photography. J Indian Prosthodontic Soc 14:248–254.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0310-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7(4):33–35 (Trans: MacDorman K.F & Minato. T: IEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(2) (2012)) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levy J, Foulsham T, Kingstone A (2013) Monsters are people too. Biol Matters 9(1):01–04.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0850 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gentile F, Ales J, Rossion B (2017) The neural dynamics of face perception. J Hum Brain Mapp 38(1):120–139.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kret EM. The role of pupil size in communication: is there room for learning. J Cogn Emotion 2018;32:1139–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simion F, Giorgio (2015) Face perception and processing in early infancy. Front Psychol 6:969–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naples JA, Wu J, Mayes CL, McPartland CJ (2017) Event-related potentials index neural response to eye contact. J Biol Psychol 127:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ashby J, Roncero C, Almeida D (2018) The early processing of metaphors and similes: evidence from eye movements and integrations. J Exp Psychol 71(1):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1278456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chinnery H, Thompson S, Noroozi S, Dyer B (2017) Scoping review of the development of artificial eyes throughout the years. Edorium J Disabil Rehabil 3:1–10Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilhelm H (2011) Disorders of the pupil. Handbook Clin Neurol 102:427–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gunaseelaraj R, Karthikeyan S, Kumar NM, Balamurugan T, Jagadeeshwaran AR (2012) Custom-made ocular prosthesis. J Pharm Bio-Allied Sci.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.100264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Binsi KP, Shamasundar BA, Dileep OA, Badii F, Howell NK (2009) Rheological and functional properties of gelatin from the skin of bigeye snapper fish: influence of gelatin on the gel-forming ability of fish mince. Int J Food Hydrocoll Preserv 23(1):132–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dabrowska A, Rotaru M, Spano F, Affolter C, Fortunato G, Lehmann S, Derler S, Spencer D, Rossi R (2017) A water-responsive gelatin based human skin model. J Tribol Int 113:316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    MacDorman K, Chattopadhyay D (2016) Reducing consistency in human realism increases the uncanny valley effect: increasing category uncertainty does not. J Cogn 146:190–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bunton B, Faulkner MG, Wolfaardt J (2005) Development of a shape memory alloy actuator for a robotic eye prosthesis. J Smart Mater Struct 14(4):43–67Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abramson D, Bohle CG, Marr PB, Booth P, Black CP, Katze BA, Moore GJ (2013) Ocular prosthesis with display device. https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2014110190A2/en. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
  27. 27.
    Visionary Effect Studio (2017) Here is an animatronic eye with dilating pupil that we designed a few years ago, Image. https://visionaryeffects.tumblr.com/post/160094398405/here-is-a-animatronic-eye-with-dilating-pupil-that. Accessed 01 Feb 2018
  28. 28.
    Walker K, Hall WD, Hurst JW (1990) The pupils. In: Clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations, 3rd edn, Ch. 58. Butterworths, Boston, pp 300–304Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Michel S, Chu B, Grimm S, Nuesch F, Borogschule A, Opris D (2012) Stretchable and transparent hydrogels as soft conductors for dielectric elastomer actuators. J Mater Chem 4(28):20736–20741CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAROB 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computing and Digital TechnologiesStaffordshire UniversityStoke-on-TrentUK

Personalised recommendations