Advertisement

Artificial Life and Robotics

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 308–316 | Cite as

Extension of a ground control interface for swarms of Small Drones

  • Nicolas DousseEmail author
  • Grégoire Heitz
  • Dario Floreano
Special Feature: Original Article
  • 462 Downloads

Abstract

Although the technology for fully autonomous swarms of robots is rapidly progressing, the human operator will continue to play an important role during any swarming mission due to safety, monitoring and control constraints. In this paper, we present the set of features that a Ground Control Interface (GCI) must incorporate to allow monitoring, control and safety of outdoor missions with a swarm of Small Drones (drones of less than 1 kg). We propose a new extension to a widely used GCI by incorporating those features and we demonstrate its usage on a swarm of 10 Small Drones flying outdoor.

Keywords

Human–Swarm interface Swarm experiments UAV Drones MAV Safety Regulations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work in this paper was supported by the myCopter project funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Program (http://www.mycopter.eu) and by ArmaSuisse, competence sector Science + Technology for the Swiss Federal Department of Defense, Civil Protection and Sport. We would also like to acknowledge Meysam Basiri and Julien Lecoeur for their useful help in reviewing the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Xu A et al (2011) Optimal complete terrain coverage using an unmanned aerial vehicle’. In: Robotics and automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE international conference on, pp. 2513–2519Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allred J et al. (2007) Sensorflock: an airborne wireless sensor network of micro-air vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pp 117–129Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Penders J et al (2011) A robot swarm assisting a human fire-fighter. Adv Robot 25(1–2):93–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Olfati-Saber R (2007) Distributed tracking for mobile sensor networks with information-driven mobility. In: American Control Conference (ACC), pp 4606–4612Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quintero S et al. (2013) Flocking with fixed-wing UAVs for distributed sensing: a stochastic optimal control approach. In: American Control Conference (ACC), pp 2025–2031Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vásárhelyi G et al (2014) Outdoor flocking and formation flight with autonomous aerial robots. In: Intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2014), 2014 IEEE/RSJ international conference on, pp. 3866–3873Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hauert S et al. (2011) Reynolds flocking in reality with fixed-wing robots: communication range vs. maximum turning rate. In: Intelligent robots and systems (IROS), 2011 IEEE/RSJ international conference on, pp. 5015–5020Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruff HA et al (2002) Human interaction with levels of automation and decision-aid fidelity in the supervisory control of multiple simulated unmanned air vehicles. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 11(4):335–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dixon SR et al (2005) Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: a workload analysis. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 47(3):479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cummings ML et al (2007) Predicting operator capacity for supervisory control of multiple UAVs. In: Innovations in intelligent machines: studies in computational intelligence 70. Springer, New York, pp 11–37Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McLurkin J et al (2006) Speaking Swarmish: human-robot interface design for large swarms of autonomous mobile robots. In: AAAI spring symposium: to boldly go where no human-robot team has gone before, pp 72–75, 2006Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kolling A et al. (2012) Towards human control of robot swarms. In: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, ACM, pp. 89–96Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vasile C et al (2011) Integrating human swarm interaction in a distributed robotic control system. In: Automation science and engineering (CASE), 2011 IEEE conference on, pp 743–748Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bashyal S et al (2008) Human swarm interaction for radiation source search and localization. In: Swarm intelligence symposium, 2008. SIS 2008. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lewis M (2013) Human interaction with multiple remote robots. Rev Hum Factors Ergon 9(1):131–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.L. Drury et al., “Awareness in unmanned aerial vehicle operations”, The International C2 Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1–10, 2008Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    International Civil Aviation Organization (2013) Safety management manual, 3rd edn. pp 1–2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAROB 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Dousse
    • 1
    Email author
  • Grégoire Heitz
    • 1
  • Dario Floreano
    • 1
  1. 1.EPFL STI IMT LISLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations