Artificial Life and Robotics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 500–503 | Cite as

Minimum Nomic: a tool for studying rule dynamics

Original Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

We propose a kind of self-amendment game, Minimum Nomic, as a model to study rule dynamics. Nomic is a game in which changing a rule of the game is a move. Minimum Nomic is a reduced version of the original Nomic, which keeps the essence but promotes the evolvability of the self-amendment game. We discuss the characteristics of Minimum Nomic from the viewpoint of how the changeability of the rules and the durability of the games change with the progress of the game. By analyzing the dynamics of purpose and goals, and the self-referential property in observations of the games played, we claim that Minimum Nomic is an interesting tool to study rule dynamics.

Key words

Rule dynamics Self-amendment Self-reference Nomic Evolvability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hashimoto T (2007) Three undecomposabilities in complex systems. European Conference on Complex Systems (ECCS’07), Dresden, October 1–5Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suber P (1990) The paradox of self-amendment. A study of logic, law, omnipotence, and change. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hofstadter DR (1985) Metamagical themas: questing for the essence of mind and pattern: Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Juul J (2003) The game, the player, the world: looking for a heart of gameness. In: Level Up: Digital Games Research Conference Proceedings, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, pp 30–45. http://www.digra.org/dl Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hofstadter DR (1979) Gödel, Escher, Bach: an eternal golden braid. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim SJ, Aizawa Y (1999) Synchronization phenomena in rule dynamical systems. Prog Theor Phys 102:729–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Namikawa J, Hashimoto T (2004) Dynamics and computation in functional shifts. Nonlineality 17:1317–1336MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics (ISAROB). 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Knowledge ScienceJapan Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyNomi, IshikawaJapan

Personalised recommendations