Brain Tumor Pathology

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 177–183 | Cite as

Genetic profile of astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas

Review Article

Abstract

Low-grade diffuse gliomas WHO grade II (diffuse astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma, oligodendroglioma) are characterized by frequent IDH1/2 mutations (>80%) that occur at a very early stage. In addition, the majority of diffuse astrocytomas (about 60%) carry TP53 mutations, which constitute a prognostic marker for shorter survival. Oligodendrogliomas show frequent loss at 1p/19q (about 70% of cases), which is associated with longer survival. With respect to clinical outcome, molecular classification on the basis of IDH1/2 mutations, TP53 mutations, and 1p/19q loss showed a predictive power similar to histological classification. IDH1/2 mutations are frequent (>80%) in secondary glioblastomas that have progressed from low-grade or anaplastic astrocytomas. Primary (de novo) glioblastomas with IDH1/2 mutations are very rare (<5%); they show an age distribution and genetic profile similar to secondary glioblastomas and are probably misclassified. Using the presence of IDH1/2 mutations as a diagnostic criterion, secondary glioblastomas account for approximately 10% of all glioblastomas. IDH1/2 mutations are the most significant predictor of favorable outcome of glioblastoma patients. The high frequency of IDH1/2 mutations in oligodendrogliomas, astrocytomas, and secondary glioblastomas derived thereof suggests these tumors share a common progenitor cell population. The absence of this molecular marker in primary glioblastomas suggests a different cell of origin; both glioblastoma subtypes acquire a similar histological phenotype as a result of common genetic alterations, including the loss of tumor suppressor genes on chromosome 10q.

Keywords

Astrocytoma Primary glioblastoma Secondary glioblastoma Oligodendroglioma IDH1 mutation TP53 mutation 1p/19q loss 

Low-grade diffuse gliomas

The 2007 World Health Organization (WHO) classification recognizes three main histological types of low-grade diffuse glioma grade II: diffuse astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma [1]. Diffuse astrocytomas tend to progress to more malignant histological types, i.e., anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III), and eventually secondary glioblastoma (WHO grade IV), whereas progression of oligodendrogliomas to anaplastic oligodendrogliomas is less predictable [1].

Frequency and combination of genetic alterations in low-grade diffuse gliomas

IDH1/2 mutations are the only genetic alteration with a high prevalence (>80% of cases) in all WHO grade II diffuse gliomas, and their frequency does not change during the progression from diffuse astrocytoma (WHO grade II) to anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III) and secondary glioblastoma (WHO grade IV). Similarly, oligodendroglioma (WHO grade II) shows a frequency of IDH1 mutation similar to that in anaplastic oligodendroglioma (WHO grade III) [2].

In addition to IDH1/2 mutations, about 60% of diffuse astrocytomas carry a TP53 mutation, whereas oligodendrogliomas show frequent loss of 1p/19q (~70% of tumors) [1, 3, 4, 5, 6]. In gliomas histologically classified as oligoastrocytomas, there is also a high frequency of IDH1/2 mutation (>80%) and, in addition, either a TP53 mutation (40%) or loss of 1p/19q (45%) [1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8]. The frequencies and combinations of genetic alterations found in low-grade diffuse gliomas (n = 360) in our recent analysis are shown in Figs 1 and 2 [2].
Fig. 1

Frequencies of genetic alterations in low-grade diffuse gliomas. Data are based on a total of 360 cases of diffuse astrocytomas, oligoastrocytomas, and oligodendrogliomas [2]. Note that the frequencies of genetic alterations in oligoastrocytomas are similar to those in all diffuse gliomas combined

Fig. 2

Frequency of selected combinations of genetic alterations in low-grade diffuse gliomas. Data are based on a total of 360 cases of diffuse astrocytomas, oligoastrocytomas, and oligodendrogliomas [2]. Note that the combinations of genetic alterations in oligoastrocytomas are similar to those in all diffuse gliomas combined

IDH1/2 mutations are likely to occur before TP53 mutations or 1p/19q loss because low-grade diffuse gliomas carrying only IDH1/2 mutations are more frequent (17% of all low-grade diffuse gliomas) than those carrying only a TP53 mutation (2%) or those showing 1p/19q loss (3%) [2]. Furthermore, analysis of multiple biopsies from the same patients revealed that there was no case in which an IDH1/2 mutation occurred after the acquisition of a TP53 mutation or loss of 1p/19q [2, 9].

We hypothesize that loss of 1p/19q in cells with IDH1/2 mutations favors an acquisition of the oligodendroglial phenotype [2, 5, 9], whereas cells with IDH1/2 mutations that subsequently acquire TP53 mutations tend to develop an astrocytic phenotype. The majority of tumors containing only an IDH1/2 mutation are histologically diagnosed as astrocytoma (66%), and less frequently as oligoastrocytoma (20%) and oligodendroglioma (15%) [2].

Molecular classification of low-grade diffuse gliomas

Because most (>90%) of WHO grade II gliomas carry at least one of these alterations (IDH1/2 mutation, TP53 mutation, or 1p/19q loss) [2] (Fig. 2), it is possible to develop a molecular classification that may complement and eventually replace histological typing. In our recent study (n = 360), patients with low-grade diffuse glioma with IDH1/2 mutations plus 1p/19q loss survived significantly longer than those with IDH1/2 mutation plus TP53 mutation [2]. Survival of patients with diffuse astrocytoma was similar to that of patients with low-grade diffuse glioma with IDH1/2 mutation plus TP53 mutation, and survival of patients with oligodendroglioma was similar to that of patients with low-grade diffuse glioma with IDH1/2 mutation plus 1p/19q loss [2]. Thus, with respect to clinical outcome of patients with low-grade diffuse gliomas, the power of molecular classification on the basis of IDH1/2 mutations, TP53 mutations, and 1p/19q loss is similar to that of histological classification [2]. When all low-grade diffuse gliomas are combined in a multivariate analysis, TP53 mutation is significantly associated with shorter survival and 1p/19q loss with longer survival, but IDH1/2 mutations are not prognostic for patient outcome [2].

A molecular classification of low-grade diffuse gliomas would be valuable, because the histological diagnosis of low-grade diffuse gliomas may be difficult in a substantial fraction of cases, with marked interobserver variability. This problem is particularly apparent for oligoastrocytomas, which are composed of a conspicuous mixture of two distinct neoplastic cell types morphologically resembling oligodendroglioma or diffuse astrocytoma [1]. Genetic profiling suggests that oligoastrocytoma is not a distinct tumor entity, but that these are monoclonal neoplasms which differ in their biology and clinical behavior. This possibility is supported by the fact that the frequency and combination of genetic alterations in oligoastrocytomas are similar to those in all diffuse gliomas combined (Figs. 1 and 2).

Primary and secondary glioblastomas

The majority of glioblastomas (WHO grade IV) affect elderly patients and manifest rapidly after a short clinical history and without evidence of a less malignant precursor lesion: these are designated primary or de novo glioblastomas. In contrast, secondary glioblastomas develop in younger patients through progression from diffuse astrocytoma (WHO grade II) or anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III) [1]. In the past, the distinction between primary and secondary glioblastomas was based on clinical data: tumors were considered to be primary if the diagnosis of glioblastoma was made at the first biopsy, without clinical or histological evidence of a preexisting, less malignant precursor lesion; the diagnosis of secondary glioblastoma required histological or clinical evidence of a preceding low-grade or anaplastic astrocytoma [10, 11].

Evidence has accumulated that primary and secondary glioblastomas develop through different genetic pathways [10]. Genetic alterations that are significantly more frequent in primary glioblastomas than secondary glioblastomas are loss of heterozygosity (LOH) 10p (47% vs. 8%), epidermal growth factor (EGFR) amplification (36% vs. 8%), and PTEN mutations (25% vs. 4%) [10, 12]. Alterations significantly more frequent in secondary glioblastomas include TP53 mutations (28% vs. 65%), LOH 19q (6% vs. 54%), and LOH 22q (41% vs. 82%) [10, 13]. However, none of these alterations reliably separates these glioblastoma subtypes. Because primary and secondary glioblastomas are histologically largely indistinguishable [14], these subtypes have remained conceptual without being used for diagnostic or treatment decisions [10, 11, 14].

IDH1/2 mutation as reliable molecular marker of secondary glioblastomas

The identification of IDH1/2 mutations has been a breakthrough because these mutations are frequent in secondary glioblastomas (>80%) but very rare in primary glioblastomas (<5%) [9, 15, 16, 17]. The small fraction of primary glioblastomas with IDH1/2 mutations occurred in patients who were significantly younger (mean, 18 years of age) than those with primary glioblastomas lacking an IDH1/2 mutation (Table 1) [15, 16, 17, 18]. In a population-based study, only 14 of 407 cases (3.4%) were identified as primary glioblastomas with IDH1/2 mutations (Fig. 3); these patients were 10 years younger and the genetic profiles of these tumors were similar to those of secondary glioblastomas, including frequent TP53 mutations and absence of EGFR amplification [17]. Toedt et al. [18] showed that primary glioblastomas with IDH1 mutations have gene expression profiles similar to those of secondary glioblastomas with IDH1 mutations. These observations suggest that primary glioblastomas with IDH1/2 mutations have progressed from less malignant precursor lesions (low-grade or anaplastic astrocytoma) that escaped clinical diagnosis and were thus misclassified as primary.
Fig. 3

Using the IDH1 mutation as a molecular marker, approximately 95% of glioblastomas correspond to their clinical diagnosis as primary or secondary glioblastoma. GBM, glioblastoma. (Data from Nobusawa et al. [17].)

Table 1

Comparison of age and IDH mutations in glioblastomas

 

Mean age of patients (years)

References

With IDH mutation

Without IDH mutation

Difference

All glioblastoma (n = 123)

32

59

27

Yan et al. [16]

All glioblastoma (n = 407)

48

61

13

Nobusawa et al. [17]

All glioblastoma (n = 183)

41

56

15

Ichimura et al. [19]

All glioblastoma (n = 98)

41

58

17

Bleeker et al. [30]

Primary glioblastoma (n = 99)

40

53

13

Balss et al. [15]

Primary glioblastoma (n = 123)

32

59

27

Yan et al. [16]

Primary glioblastoma (n = 377)

51

61

10

Nobusawa et al. [17]

Primary glioblastoma (n = 86)

44

65

21

Toedt et al. [18]

Although rare, there are also secondary glioblastomas that lack IDH1/2 mutations (Fig. 3). Such secondary glioblastomas have infrequent TP53 mutations, and the patients have a short clinical history [17]. Furthermore, most of these secondary glioblastomas (seven of eight) had developed through progression from an anaplastic glioma (WHO grade III), whereas the majority of secondary glioblastomas with IDH1/2 mutations had progressed from a WHO grade II glioma [17]. The possibility exists, therefore, that some neoplasms diagnosed as anaplastic glioma were actually primary glioblastomas that were misdiagnosed as the result of a sampling error, e.g., because of the absence of necrosis or microvascular proliferation in the available histological sections.

IDH1/2 mutations, as a genetic marker of secondary but not primary glioblastomas, correspond to the respective clinical diagnosis in 385 of 407 (95%) of glioblastomas (Fig. 3) [17]. Using the presence of IDH1/2 mutation as a molecular criterion, secondary glioblastomas account for 6–13% of all glioblastomas in hospital-based studies [15, 16, 19] and for 9% of all glioblastomas at the population level [17].

In conclusion, the IDH1/2 mutation is reliable genetic marker of secondary glioblastomas and their precursor lesions and should be assessed in translational investigations and clinical trials.

IDH1/2 mutation correlates with favorable outcome for patients with glioblastoma

IDH1/2 mutation is the most reliable molecular marker to predict favorable outcome of patients with glioblastoma [16, 17, 20, 21]. Yan et al. [16] showed that the median survival was 31 months for 14 glioblastoma patients with IDH1/2 mutation, compared with 15 months for 115 patients without IDH1/2 mutations. At a population level, IDH1/2 mutation is the most significant genetic marker of longer survival for glioblastoma patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy (median survival, 27.1 vs. 11.3 months) [17] (Table 2).
Table 2

Genetic alterations that are prognostic for glioblastoma patients at the population level (multivariate analysis)

Genetic alteration

No. of cases

Hazard ratio

(95% CI)

References

IDH1 mutation

203

0.29 (0.16–0.51)*

Nobusawa et al. [17]

TP53 mutation

386

0.86 (0.69–1.07)

Ohgaki et al. [11]

PTEN mutation

324

0.99 (0.76–1.28)

Ohgaki et al. [11]

p16INK4a deletion

328

0.90 (0.71–1.14)

Ohgaki et al. [11]

EGFR amplification

371

1.08 (0.87–1.34)

Ohgaki et al. [11]

1p36 loss

231

0.7 (0.5–1.0)*

Homma et al. [14]

19q13 loss

218

0.7 (0.4–1.2)

Homma et al. [14]

LOH 10q

269

1.28 (0.98–1.67)**

Ohgaki et al. [11]

* Significantly associated with longer survival

** Significantly associated with shorter survival

IDH1/2 mutations are associated with typical expression and methylation phenotypes in glioblastomas

Glioblastomas have also been classified on the basis of cDNA expression profiles, with proneural, neural, classic, mesenchymal, and proliferative patterns being described [22, 23]. Most glioblastomas with IDH1/2 mutations (11/12, 92%) showed a proneural expression signature; conversely, approximately 30% of glioblastomas with a proneural signature had IDH1 mutations [23]. Glioblastomas lacking IDH1/2 mutations were classified as classical, mesenchymal, neural, or proneural [23]. Toedt et al. [18] clustered data on the basis of the expression signature in glioblastomas reported by Phillips et al. [22]. One cluster corresponded to IDH1 mutated tumors with a proneural signature, and another cluster broadly corresponded to IDH1 wild-type tumors with proliferative or mesenchymal signatures [18].

Promoter methylation of MGMT, RB1, p14ARF, p16INK4a, and TIMP3 is significantly more frequent in secondary than in primary glioblastomas [10]. In a study by Noushmehr et al. [24], a distinct subset of glioblastomas displayed concerted CpG island methylation at a large number of loci; these tumors belonged to the proneural subgroup and were tightly associated with IDH1/2 mutations. Similarly, in a study of 131 brain tumors, hypermethylation of CpG loci was strongly associated with IDH1/2 mutations [25]. It is of interest to note that similar hypermethylation signatures were detected in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases carrying IDH1/2 mutations [26]. This finding suggests that genome-wide epigenetic abnormalities associated with IDH1/2 mutations may cause the distinct expression profiles and favorable biological behavior of glioblastomas with IDH1/2 mutations.

Genetic pathways to astrocytic and oligodendroglial diffuse gliomas

Origin of primary and secondary glioblastomas

Primary and secondary glioblastomas may develop from different cells of origin. The indirect evidence for this hypothesis includes the observations that (1) only secondary glioblastomas, but not primary glioblastomas, share common IDH1/2 mutations with oligodendrogliomas; (2) primary and secondary glioblastomas develop in patients of different age groups; and (3) these glioblastoma subtypes have significantly different biological behavior.

If this is the case, cancer stem cells in primary and secondary glioblastomas may also be different. One study showed that the relative content of CD133+ cells was significantly higher in primary than in secondary glioblastomas, and that CD133+ expression was associated with neurosphere formation only in primary but not in secondary glioblastomas [27]. Lottaz et al. [28] compared gene expression profiles in 17 glioblastoma cancer stem cell (CSC) lines and in their different putative founder cells. Two subgroups of glioblastoma were distinguished: type I CSC lines displaying “proneural” signature genes and resembling fetal neural stem cell (NSC) lines, and type II CSC lines showing “mesenchymal” transcriptional profiles and resembling adult NSC lines [28]. Since glioblastomas with IDH1 mutations typically have a proneural signature [23], secondary glioblastomas may derive from cells that have preserved or acquired the properties of fetal NSC lines, distinct from those of adult NSC lines [28].

Another possibility would be that primary and secondary glioblastomas develop from the same precursor cells, but show distinct biological behavior because of different genetic alterations, most importantly, the absence or presence of IDH1/2 mutations. If this is the case, specific glial progenitor cells present in younger patients could be more susceptible to the acquisition of IDH1/2 mutations and the consequent growth advantage than those cells present in older patients.

Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma

Our current concept of genetic pathways to astrocytic and oligodendroglial diffuse gliomas is summarized in Fig. 4. Diffuse astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas may originate from common glial precursor cells carrying IDH1/2 mutations. The additional loss of 1p/19q in cells with IDH1/2 mutations may favor the acquisition of the oligodendroglial phenotype. Secondary glioblastomas share a common cellular origin with oligodendrogliomas, whereas primary glioblastomas may derive from different precursor cells lacking IDH1/2 mutations (Fig. 4). The common histological phenotype of primary and secondary glioblastomas may be attributable to frequently shared genetic alterations, e.g., loss of tumor suppressor genes on chromosome 10q25-qter [10, 12, 29].
Fig. 4

Genetic pathways to astrocytic and oligodendroglial diffuse gliomas. LOH, loss of heterozygosity

References

  1. 1.
    Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (eds) (2007) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. IARC, LyonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim YH, Nobusawa S, Mittelbronn M, Paulus W, Brokinkel B, Keyvani K, Sure U, Wrede K, Nakazato Y, Vital A, Mariani L, Stawski R, Watanabe T, De Girolami U, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H (2010) Molecular classification of low-grade diffuse gliomas. Am J Pathol 177:2708–2714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 114:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Okamoto Y, Di Patre PL, Burkhard C, Horstmann S, Jourde B, Fahey M, Schuler D, Probst-Hensch NM, Yasargil MG, Yonekawa Y, Lutolf U, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H (2004) Population-based study on incidence, survival rates, and genetic alterations of low-grade astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 108:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Watanabe T, Nakamura M, Kros JM, Burkhard C, Yonekawa Y, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H (2002) Phenotype versus genotype correlation in oligodendrogliomas and low-grade diffuse astrocytomas. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 103:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reifenberger G, Louis DN (2003) Oligodendroglioma: toward molecular definitions in diagnostic neuro-oncology. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 62:111–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maintz D, Fiedler K, Koopmann J, Rollbrocker B, Nechev S, Lenartz D, Stangl AP, Louis DN, Schramm J, Wiestler OD, von Deimling A (1997) Molecular genetic evidence for subtypes of oligoastrocytomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 56:1098–1104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mueller W, Hartmann C, Hoffmann A, Lanksch W, Kiwit J, Tonn J, Veelken J, Schramm J, Weller M, Wiestler OD, Louis DN, von Deimling A (2002) Genetic signature of oligoastrocytomas correlates with tumor location and denotes distinct molecular subsets. Am J Pathol 161:313–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Watanabe T, Nobusawa S, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H (2009) IDH1 mutations are early events in the development of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Am J Pathol 174:1149–1153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ohgaki H, Kleihues P (2007) Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma. Am J Pathol 170:1445–1453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ohgaki H, Dessen P, Jourde B, Horstmann S, Nishikawa T, Di Patre PL, Burkhard C, Schuler D, Probst-Hensch NM, Maiorka PC, Baeza N, Pisani P, Yonekawa Y, Yasargil MG, Lutolf UM, Kleihues P (2004) Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer Res 64:6892–6899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fujisawa H, Reis RM, Nakamura M, Colella S, Yonekawa Y, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H (2000) Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 10 is more extensive in primary (de novo) than in secondary glioblastomas. Lab Invest 80:65–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakamura M, Ishida E, Shimada K, Kishi M, Nakase H, Sakaki T, Konishi N (2005) Frequent LOH on 22q12.3 and TIMP-3 inactivation occur in the progression to secondary glioblastomas. Lab Invest 85:165–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Homma T, Fukushima T, Vaccarella S, Yonekawa Y, Di Patre PL, Franceschi S, Ohgaki H (2006) Correlation among pathology, genotype, and patient outcomes in glioblastoma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 65:846–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Balss J, Meyer J, Mueller W, Korshunov A, Hartmann C, von Deimling A (2008) Analysis of the IDH1 codon 132 mutation in brain tumors. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 116:597–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Yuan W, Kos I, Batinic-Haberle I, Jones S, Riggins GJ, Friedman H, Friedman A, Reardon D, Herndon J, Kinzler KW, Velculescu VE, Vogelstein B, Bigner DD (2009) IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 360:765–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nobusawa S, Watanabe T, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H (2009) IDH1 mutations as molecular signature and predictive factor of secondary glioblastomas. Clin Cancer Res 15:6002–6007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Toedt G, Barbus S, Wolter M, Felsberg J, Tews B, Blond F, Sabel MC, Hofmann S, Becker N, Hartmann C, Ohgaki H, von Deimling A, Wiestler OD, Hahn M, Lichter P, Reifenberger G, Radlwimmer B (2011) Molecular signatures classify astrocytic gliomas by IDH1 mutation status. Int J Cancer 128:1095–1103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ichimura K, Pearson DM, Kocialkowski S, Backlund LM, Chan R, Jones DT, Collins VP (2009) IDH1 mutations are present in the majority of common adult gliomas but rare in primary glioblastomas. J Neuro-Oncol 11:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Felsberg J, Wolter M, Seul H, Friedensdorf B, Goppert M, Sabel MC, Reifenberger G (2010) Rapid and sensitive assessment of the IDH1 and IDH2 mutation status in cerebral gliomas based on DNA pyrosequencing. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 119:501–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gravendeel LA, Kloosterhof NK, Bralten LB, van Marion R, Dubbink HJ, Dinjens W, Bleeker FE, Hoogenraad CC, Michiels E, Kros JM, van den Bent M, Smitt PA, French PJ (2010) Segregation of non-p.R132H mutations in IDH1 in distinct molecular subtypes of glioma. Hum Mutat 31:E1186–E1199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Phillips HS, Kharbanda S, Chen R, Forrest WF, Soriano RH, Wu TD, Misra A, Nigro JM, Colman H, Soroceanu L, Williams PM, Modrusan Z, Feuerstein BG, Aldape K (2006) Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis. Cancer Cell 9:157–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, Wang V, Qi Y, Wilkerson MD, Miller CR, Ding L, Golub T, Mesirov JP, Alexe G, Lawrence M, O’Kelly M, Tamayo P, Weir BA, Gabriel S, Winckler W, Gupta S, Jakkula L, Feiler HS, Hodgson JG, James CD, Sarkaria JN, Brennan C, Kahn A, Spellman PT, Wilson RK, Speed TP, Gray JW, Meyerson M, Getz G, Perou CM, Hayes DN (2010) Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 17:98–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Noushmehr H, Weisenberger DJ, Diefes K, Phillips HS, Pujara K, Berman BP, Pan F, Pelloski CE, Sulman EP, Bhat KP, Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Hayes DN, Perou CM, Schmidt HK, Ding L, Wilson RK, Van Den BD, Shen H, Bengtsson H, Neuvial P, Cope LM, Buckley J, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Laird PW, Aldape K (2010) Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell 17:510–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Christensen BC, Smith AA, Zheng S, Koestler DC, Houseman EA, Marsit CJ, Wiemels JL, Nelson HH, Karagas MR, Wrensch MR, Kelsey KT, Wiencke JK (2011) DNA methylation, isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation, and survival in glioma. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:143–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Figueroa ME, bdel-Wahab O, Lu C, Ward PS, Patel J, Shih A, Li Y, Bhagwat N, Vasanthakumar A, Fernandez HF, Tallman MS, Sun Z, Wolniak K, Peeters JK, Liu W, Choe SE, Fantin VR, Paietta E, Lowenberg B, Licht JD, Godley LA, Delwel R, Valk PJ, Thompson CB, Levine RL, Melnick A (2010) Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation. Cancer Cell 18:553–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beier D, Hau P, Proescholdt M, Lohmeier A, Wischhusen J, Oefner PJ, Aigner L, Brawanski A, Bogdahn U, Beier CP (2007) CD133(+) and CD133(–) glioblastoma-derived cancer stem cells show differential growth characteristics and molecular profiles. Cancer Res 67:4010–4015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lottaz C, Beier D, Meyer K, Kumar P, Hermann A, Schwarz J, Junker M, Oefner PJ, Bogdahn U, Wischhusen J, Spang R, Storch A, Beier CP (2010) Transcriptional profiles of CD133+ and CD133– glioblastoma-derived cancer stem cell lines suggest different cells of origin. Cancer Res 70:2030–2040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fujisawa H, Kurrer M, Reis RM, Yonekawa Y, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H (1999) Acquisition of the glioblastoma phenotype during astrocytoma progression is associated with LOH on chromosome 10q25-qter. Am J Pathol 155:387–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bleeker FE, Atai NA, Lamba S, Jonker A, Rijkeboer D, Bosch KS, Tigchelaar W, Troost D, Vandertop WP, Bardelli A, Van Noorden CJ (2010) The prognostic IDH1 (R132) mutation is associated with reduced NADP+-dependent IDH activity in glioblastoma. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 119:487–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Society of Brain Tumor Pathology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Pathology SectionInternational Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
  2. 2.Department of PathologyUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations