Abstract
In this article, we present our formalization of the ABZ landing gear case study in Event-B. The development was carried out using the Rodin platform and mainly used superposition refinement to structure the specification. To validate the model, we complemented proof with animation and model checking. For the latter, we used the ProB animator and model checker. Graphical representation of the model turned out to be crucial in the development and validation of the model; this was achieved using the visualization features provided by ProB and BMotion Studio. In addition, we discuss the positive and negative aspects of the Event-B language and tools which we encountered while working on the ABZ case study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The general valve is introduced in a later refinement step.
It is, however, slightly more efficient than checking each of these properties in isolation.
The projection is on the abstract variables gear and door; as now the gears and doors can move asynchronously.
The online version is available at http://www.stups.hhu.de/ProB/index.php5/ABZ14.
Where ProB was useful to detect deadlocks during, and in some cases also after development of the model.
References
Abrial, J.-R.: The B-book: Assigning programs to meanings. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)
Abrial, J.-R.: Modeling in Event-B: System and Software Engineering. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)
Abrial, J.-R., Butler, M., Hallerstede, S.: An open extensible tool environment for Event-B. In: Liu, Z., He, J. (eds.) Proceedings ICFEM’06, LNCS 4260, pp. 588–605. Springer-Verlag (2006)
Bendisposto, J.: Directed and Distributed Model Checking of B-Specifications. Dissertation, University of Düsseldorf (2015)
Bert, D., Potet, M.-L., Stouls, N.: Genesyst: A tool to reason about behavioral aspects of B event specifications. application to security properties. In ZB 2005, pages 299–318 (2005)
Boniol, F., Wiels, V.: The Landing Gear System Case Study. In: ABZ Case Study. Communications in Computer Information Science, vol. 433. Springer (2014)
Börger, E.: Abstract State Machines. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2003)
Bouton, T., de Oliveira, D.C.B., Déharbe, D., Fontaine, P.: Verit: an open, trustable and efficient smt-solver. In: Schmidt, R.A. (eds.) Proc. Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 151–156. Springer (2009)
Cansell, D., Méry, D., Rehm, J.: Time constraint patterns for event B development. In: Julliand, J., Kouchnarenko, O. (eds.) B 2007: Formal Specification and Development in B, 7th International Conference of B Users, Besançon, France, January 17–19, 2007, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4355 pp. 140–154. Springer (2007)
Dahlström, E., Dengler, P., Grasso, A., Liley, C., McCormack, C., Schepers, D., Watt, J.: Scalable vector graphics (svg) 1.1. World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation, vol. 16 (2011)
de Moura, L.M., Bjørner, N.: Z3: An efficient smt solver. In: Ramakrishnan, C.R., Rehof, J. (eds.) TACAS, LNCS 4963, pp. 337–340. Springer (2008)
Deharbe, D., Fontaine, P., Guyot, Y., Voisin, L.: Smt solvers for rodin. In: Proceedings ABZ’2012, LNCS. Springer (to appear)
Gmehlich, R., Grau, K., Hallerstede, S., Leuschel, M., Lösch, F., Plagge, D.: On fitting a formal method into practice. In: Qin, S., Qiu, Z. (eds.) Proceedings ICFEM’2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6991, pp. 195–210. Springer (2011)
Hallerstede, S., Jastram, M., Ladenberger, L.: A method and tool for tracing requirements into specifications. Sci. Comput. Program. 82, 2–21 (2014)
Hallerstede, S., Leuschel, M.: Constraint-based deadlock checking of high-level specifications. TPLP 11(4–5), 767–782 (2011)
Hansen, D., Ladenberger, L., Wiegard, H., Bendisposto, J., Leuschel, M.: Validation of the ABZ Landing Gear System using ProB. In: ABZ 2014: The Landing Gear Case Study, pp. 66–79. Springer (2014)
Hoang, T.S., Abrial, J.: Event-b decomposition for parallel programs. In: Frappier, M., Glässer, U., Khurshid, S., Laleau, R., Reeves, S. (eds.) Abstract State Machines, Alloy, B and Z, Second International Conference, ABZ 2010, Orford, QC, Canada, February 22–25, 2010. Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5977, pp. 319–333. Springer (2010)
Koenig, D., Glover, A., King, P., Laforge, G., Skeet, J.: Groovy in action, vol. 91. Manning (2007)
Krings, S., Bendisposto, J., Leuschel, M.: Turning failure into proof: evaluating the prob disprover. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop about Sets and Tools (2014)
Ladenberger, L.: BMotion Studio for ProB Project Website. http://stups.hhu.de/ProB/w/BMotion_Studio, (May 2015)
Ladenberger, L., Bendisposto, J., Leuschel, M.: Visualising Event-B models with B-Motion Studio. In: Proceedings FMICS’2009, LNCS 5825, pp. 202–204. Verlag (2009)
Ladenberger, L., Dobrikov, I., Leuschel, M.: An approach for creating domain specific visualisations of csp models. In: Giannakopoulou, D., Salan, G. (eds.) HOFM 2014, LNCS (2014)
Lamport, L.: Real-time model checking is really simple. In: Borrione, D., Paul, W.J. (eds.) Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods, 13th IFIP WG 10.5 Advanced Research Working Conference, CHARME 2005, Saarbrücken, Germany, October 3–6, 2005, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3725, pp. 162–175. Springer (2005)
Leuschel, M., Butler, M.J.: ProB: an automated analysis toolset for the B method. STTT 10(2), 185–203 (2008)
Ligot, O., Bendisposto, J., Leuschel, M.: Debugging event-b models using the prob disprover plug-in. Proceedings AFADL 7 (2007)
Plagge, D., Leuschel, M.: Seven at a stroke: LTL model checking for high-level specifications in B, Z, CSP, and more. STTT 11, 9–21 (2010)
Roscoe, A.W., Hoare, C.A.R., Bird R.: The Theory and Practice of Concurrency. Prentice-Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (1997)
Rubel, D., Wren, J., Clayberg, E.: The Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework (GEF). Addison-Wesley Professional (2011)
Butler, M., Savicks, Vitaly, Colley, J.: Co-simulation environment for rodin: landing gear case study. Communications in Computer Information Science, vol. 433. Springer (2014)
Silva, R., Butler, M.: Shared event composition/decomposition in event-b. In: Aichernig, B.K., de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M. (eds.) FMCO, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6957, pp. 122–141. Springer (2010)
Silva, R., Pascal, C., Hoang, T .S., Butler, M .J.: Decomposition tool for event-b. Softw., Pract. Exp. 41(5), 199–208 (2011)
Su, W., Abrial, J.-R.: Aircraft landing gear system: Approaches with event-b to the modeling of an industrial system. In: ABZ 2014: The Landing Gear Case Study, pp. 19–35. Springer (2014)
W3C CSS Working Group. Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Snapshot 2010. http://www.w3.org/TR/css-2010/ (2011)
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Stefan Hallerstede for various discussions and support in developing the formal Event-B model. Finally, we are thankful to anonymous referees for their useful feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work in this paper is partly funded by ADVANCE, an European Commission Information and Communication Technologies FP7 project.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ladenberger, L., Hansen, D., Wiegard, H. et al. Validation of the ABZ landing gear system using ProB. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transfer 19, 187–203 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-015-0395-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-015-0395-9