Adsorption voltammetric peak: approximate calculation algorithm taking into account lateral interactions

  • Vladimir D. IvanovEmail author
Original Paper


Voltammetric peak of adsorbed electroactive system with lateral interactions may be described theoretically by a parametric equation; no exact explicit current-potential relation is achievable. Approximate calculation algorithm (LAT) is presented for establishing this relation; separate version of algorithm (LAT1) has been developed for negative values of the interaction parameter. These algorithms allow performing calculations with high accuracy. Unfortunately, precision has been achieved at the expense of simplicity: LAT makes use of up to nine adjustable coefficients. Accuracy of LAT has been compared with accuracy of GLI equation proposed by Alévêque and Levillain Electrochem Commun 67:73–79, 2016.


Voltammetry Adsorption Modelling Lateral interactions 



  1. 1.
    Stromberg AG, Selivanova EV, Romanenko SV (2004) Simulation of asymmetric peak-shaped analytical signals by the frame representation of their shape using stripping voltammetry as an example. J Anal Chem 59(8):742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kooshki M, Díaz-Cruz JM, Abdollahi H, Ariño C, Esteban M (2011) Asymmetric logistic peak as a suitable function for the resolution of highly asymmetric voltammograms in non-bilinear systems. Analyst. 136(22):4696–4703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cavanillas S, Serrano N, Díaz-Cruz JM, Ariño C, Esteban M (2016) Parametric signal fitting of highly asymmetric voltammograms by using the exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) function. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 152:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laviron E (1974) Surface linear potential sweep voltammetry: equation of the peaks for a reversible reaction when interactions between the adsorbed molecules are taken into account. J Electroanal Chem 52(3):395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laviron E (1979) The use of linear potential sweep voltammetry and of a.c. voltammetry for the study of the surface electrochemical reaction of strongly adsorbed systems and of redox modified electrodes. J Electroanal Chem 100(1-2):263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laviron E, Roullier L (1980) General expression of the linear potential sweep voltammogram for a surface redox reaction with interactions between the adsorbed molecules: applications to modified electrodes. J Electroanal Chem 115(1):65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Antuch M, Abradelo DG, Cao R (2015) Intermolecular interactions in mixed self-assembled monolayers of ferrocene. Electroanalysis. 27(8):1939–1943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith DF, Willman K, Kuo K, Murray RW (1979) Chemically modified electrodes: XV. Electrochemistry and waveshape analysis of aminophenylferrocene bonded to acid chloride functionalized ruthenium, platinum, and tin oxide electrodes. J Electroanal Chem 95(2):217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alévêque O, Levillain E (2015) Electroactive self-assembled monolayers: a versatile function to fit symmetric voltammetric peak. Electrochem Commun 51:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alévêque O, Levillain E (2016) A generalized lateral interactions function to fit voltammetric peaks of self-assembled monolayers. Electrochem Commun 67:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCargar JW, Neff VD (1988) Thermodynamics of mixed-valence intercalation reactions: the electrochemical reduction of Prussian blue. J Phys Chem 92(12):3598–3604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Savitzky A, Golay MJE (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analyt Chem 36(8):1627–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of ChemistrySt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations