Electrochemical synthesis of copper(II) oxide nanorods and their application in photocatalytic reactions

  • Ebrahim Mousali
  • Mohammad Ali ZanjanchiEmail author
Original Paper


A new way of synthesizing nanoscale copper oxide particles is described in this work. Oxides of an intermediate metal, such as copper oxide, can be used as an effective semiconductor in the photocatalytic reactions once they are prepared in a special way. The CuO nanorods were synthesized electrochemically under surfactant-free, static conditions. The obtained nanorods have an average length of less than 50 nm. The CuO nanorods were used as a heterogeneous catalyst in an aqueous medium. 2,4-Dichlorophenol (DCP) was used as a probe molecule. The CuO nanorods showed an excellent ability to degrade DCP under visible light and without the need for any auxiliary oxidizing agent.


CuO Nanorods DCP Degradation Visible light Heterogeneous catalyst 



The authors thank the University of Guilan for supporting this work.

Supplementary material

10008_2019_4194_MOESM1_ESM.docx (336 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 335 kb)


  1. 1.
    Anyaogu KC, Fedorov AV, Neckers DC (2008) Synthesis, characterization, and antifouling potential of functionalized copper nanoparticles. Langmuir 24:4340–4346Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Umadevi M, Christy AJ (2013) Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of CuO nanoflowers. Spectrochim Acta Part A 109:133–137Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ogwu A, Darma T, Bouquerel B (2007) Electrical resistivity of copper oxide thin films prepared by reactive magnetron sputtering. J Ach Mater Manuf Eng 24:172–177Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borgohain K, Mahamuni S (2002) Formation of single-phase CuO quantum particles. J Mater Res 17:1220–1223Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang M, He J, Hu X, Yan C, Cheng Z (2011) CuO nanostructures as quartz crystal microbalance sensing layers for detection of trace hydrogen cyanide gas. Environ Sci Technol 45:6088–6094Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yuan W, Qiu Z, Chen Y, Zhao B, Liu M, Tang Y (2018) A binder-free composite anode composed of CuO nanosheets and multi-wall carbon nanotubes for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 267:150–160Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rath PC, Patra J, Saikia D, Mishra M, Tseng CM, Chang JK, Kao HM (2018) Comparative study on the morphology-dependent performance of various CuO nanostructures as anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:10876–10885Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xiang JY, Tu JP, Huang XH, Yang YZ (2008) A comparison of anodically grown CuO nanotube film and Cu2O film as anodes for lithium ion batteries. J Solid State Electrochem 12:941–945Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ying L, Cao X, Jiang D, Jia D, Liu J (2018) Hierarchical CuO nanorod arrays in situ generated on three-dimensional copper foam via cyclic voltammetry oxidation for high-performance supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A 6:10474–10483Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Medeiros NG, Ribas VC, Lavayen V, Da Silva JA (2016) Synthesis of flower-like CuO hierarchical nanostructures as an electrochemical platform for glucose sensing. J Solid State Electrochem 20:2419–2426Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hou L, Zhang C, Li L, Du C, Li X, Kang XF, Chen W (2018) CO gas sensors based on p-type CuO nanotubes and CuO nanocubes: morphology and surface structure effects on the sensing performance. Talanta 188:41–49Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Srivastava AK, Varma GD (2018) Highly selective and efficient room temperature NO2 gas sensors based on Zn-doped CuO nanostructure-rGO hybrid. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:10640–10655Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun Q, Zhou S, Shi X, Wang X, Gao L, Li Z, Hao Y (2018) Efficiency enhancement of perovskite solar cells via electrospun CuO nanowires as buffer layers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:11289–11296Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shi G, Bao Y, Chen B, Xu J (2017) Phenol hydroxylation over cubic/monoclinic mixed phase CuO nanoparticles prepared by chemical vapor deposition. React Kinet Mech Catal 122:289–303Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chakraborty S, Das A, Begum MR, Dhara S, Tyagi A (2011) Vibrational properties of CuO nanoparticles synthesized by hydrothermal technique. AIP Conf Proc 1349:841–842Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Neupane MP, Kim YK, Park IS, Kim KA, Lee MH, Bae TS (2009) Temperature driven morphological changes of hydrothermally prepared copper oxide nanoparticles. Surf Interface Anal 41:259–263Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jia W, Reitz E, Sun H, Li B, Zhang H, Lei Y (2009) From Cu2(OH)3Cl to nanostructured sisal-like Cu(OH) 2 and CuO: synthesis and characterization. J Appl Phys 105:064917Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhao Y, Zhao J, Li Y, Ma D, Hou S, Li L, Hou S, Hao X, Wang Z (2011) Room temperature synthesis of 2D CuO nanoleaves in aqueous solution. Nanotechnology 22:115604Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen J, Zhang F, Wang J, Zhang G, Miao B, X Fan X, Yan D, Yan PX (2008), CuO nanowires synthesized by thermal oxidation route. J Alloys Compd 454:268–273Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jiang X, Herricks T, Xia Y (2002) CuO nanowires can be synthesized by heating copper substrates in air. Nano Lett 2:1333–1338Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anandan S, Lee GJ, Wub JJ (2012) Sonochemical synthesis of CuO nanostructures with different morphology. Ultrason Sonochem 19:682–686Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deng C, Hu H, Ge X, Han C, Zhao D, Shao G (2011) One-pot sonochemical fabrication of hierarchical hollow CuO submicrospheres. Ultrason Sonochem 18:932–937Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Qiu M, Zhu L, Zhang T, Li H, Sun Y, Liu K (2012) Ultrasound assisted quick synthesis of square-brick-like porous CuO and optical properties. Mater Res Bull 47:2437–2441Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xiao G, Gao P, Wang L, Chen Y, Wang Y, Zhang G (2011) Ultrasonochemical-assisted synthesis of CuO nanorods with high hydrogen storage ability. J Nanomater 2011:3Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zou Y, Li Y, Guo Y, Zhou Q, An D (2012) Ultrasound-assisted synthesis of CuO nanostructures templated by cotton fibers. Mater Res Bull 47:3135–3140Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cai PJ, Shi M (2010) Large scale synthesis of shuttle like CuO nanocrystals by microwave irradiation. Adv Mater Res 92:117–123Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jung A, Cho S, Cho WJ, Lee KH (2012) Morphology-controlled synthesis of CuO nano- and microparticles using microwave irradiation. Korean J Chem Eng 29:243–248Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qiu G, Dharmarathna S, Zhang Y, Opembe N, Huang H, Suib SL (2011) Facile microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of CuO nanomaterials and their catalytic and electrochemical properties. J Phys Chem C 116:468–477Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Song HC, Park SH, Huh YD (2007) Fabrication of hierarchical CuO microspheres. Bull Kor Chem Soc 28:477–480Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang H, Xu J-Z, Zhu JJ, Chen HY (2002) Preparation of CuO nanoparticles by microwave irradiation. J Cryst Growth 244:88–94Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu L, Xu HY, Wang F, Zhang F, Meng ZD, Zhao W, Oh WC (2012) Microwave-assisted synthesis of flower-like and plate-like CuO nanopowder and their photocatalytic activity for polluted lake water. J Korean Ceram Soc 49:151–154Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhu J, Qian X (2010) From 2-D CuO nanosheets to 3-D hollow nanospheres: interface-assisted synthesis, surface photovoltage properties and photocatalytic activity. J Solid State Chem 183:1632–1639Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hoa ND, Quy NV, Jung H, Kim D, Kim H, Hong SK (2010) Synthesis of porous CuO nanowires and its application to hydrogen detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem 146:266–272Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hsieh CT, Chen JM, Lin HH, Shih HC (2003) Synthesis of well-ordered CuO nanofibers by a self-catalytic growth mechanism. Appl Phys Lett 82:3316–3318Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li X, Wang Y, Lei Y, Gu Z (2012) Highly sensitive H2S sensor based on template-synthesized CuO nanowires. RSC Adv 2:2302–2307Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Malandrino G, Finocchiaro ST, Nigro RL, Bongiorno C, Spinella C, Fragala IL (2004) Free-standing copper(II) oxide nanotube arrays through an MOCVD template process. Chem Mater 16:5559–5561Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mu C, He J (2011) Confined conversion of CuS nanowires to CuO nanotubes by annealing-induced diffusion in nanochannels. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:150Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang S, Huang Q, Wen X, Li XY, Yang S (2002) Thermal oxidation of Cu2S nanowires: a template method for the fabrication of mesoscopic CuxO (x= 1, 2) wires. Phys Chem Chem Phys 4:3425–3429Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wu HQ, Wei XW, Shao MW, Gu JS, Qu MZ (2002) Synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using carbon nanotubes as templates. Chem Phys Lett 364:152–156Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhou H, Wong SS (2008) A facile and mild synthesis of 1-D ZnO, CuO, and α-Fe2O3 nanostructures and nanostructured arrays. ACS Nano 2:944–958Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhu Y, Zhou G, Lin Y, Liu L (2012) Controllable synthesis of well-aligned CuO nanotube arrays using porous alumina templates. Cryst Res Technol 47:658–662Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mallick P, Sahu S (2012) Structure, microstructure and optical absorption analysis of CuO nanoparticles synthesized by sol-gel route. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2:71–74Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ahmad T, Chopra R, Ramanujachary K, Lofland S, Ganguli A (2005) Canted antiferromagnetism in copper oxide nanoparticles synthesized by the reverse-micellar route. Solid State Sci 7:891–895Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Han D, Yang H, Zhu C, Wang F (2008) Controlled synthesis of CuO nanoparticles using TritonX-100-based water-in-oil reverse micelles. Powder Technol 185:286–290Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Song X, Yu H, Sun S (2005) Single-crystalline CuO nanobelts fabricated by a convenient route. J Colloid Interface Sci 289:588–591Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hennemann J, Sauerwald T, Kohl CD, Wagner T, Bognitzki M, Greiner A (2012) Electrospun copper oxide nanofibers for H2S dosimetry. Phys Status Solidi A 209:911–916Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Xiang H, Long Y, Yu X, Zhang X, Zhao N, Xu J (2011) A novel and facile method to prepare porous hollow CuO and Cu nanofibers based on electrospinning. Cryst Eng Comm 13:4856–4860Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chen U, Chueh Y, Lai S, Chou L, Shih HC (2006) Synthesis and characterization of self-catalyzed CuO nanorods on Cu/TaN/Si assembly using vacuum-arc cu deposition and vapor-solid reaction. J Vac Sci Technol B 24:139–114Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Li Y, Kuai P, Huo P, Liu CJ (2009) Fabrication of CuO nanofibers via the plasma decomposition of Cu(OH)2. Mater Lett 63:188–190Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hai Z, Zhu C, Huang J, Liu H, Chen J (2010) Controllable synthesis of CuO nanowires and Cu2O crystals with shape evolution via γ-irradiation. Inorg Chem 49:7217–7219Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zhang Q, Zhang K, Xu D, Yang G, Huang H, Nie F, Liu C, Yang S (2014) CuO nanostructures: synthesis, characterization, growth mechanisms, fundamental properties, and applications. Prog Mater Sci 60:208–337Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yuan GQ, Jiang HF, Lin C, Liao SJ (2007) Shape- and size-controlled electrochemical synthesis of cupric oxide nanocrystals. J Cryst Growth 303:400–406Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Toboonsung B, Singjai P (2011) Formation of CuO nanorods and their bundles by an electrochemical dissolution and deposition process. J Alloys Compd 509:4132–4137Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zanjanchi M, Ebrahimian A, Arvand M (2010) Sulphonated cobalt phthalocyanine-MCM-41: an active photocatalyst for degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol. J Hazard Mater 175:992–1000Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Karci A (2014) Degradation of chlorophenols and alkylphenol ethoxylates, two representative textile chemicals, in water by advanced oxidation processes: the state of the art on transformation products and toxicity. Chemosphere 99:1–18Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pera-Titus M, Garcı́a-Molina V, Baños MA, Giménez J, Esplugas S (2004) Degradation of chlorophenols by means of advanced oxidation processes: a general review. Appl Catal B 47:219–256Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Grote B (2012) Application of advanced oxidation processes (AOP) in water treatment. 37th Annual Water Industry Operations Workshop Parklands, Gold Coast 17–23Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Khan MM, Adil SF, Al-Mayouf A (2015) Metal oxides as photocatalysts. J Saudi Chem Soc 19:462–464Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chen W, Chen J, Feng Y-B, Hong L, Chen Q-Y, Wu L-F, Lin X-H, Xia, Xing-Hua (2012) Peroxidase-like activity of water-soluble cupric oxide nanoparticles and its analytical application for detection of hydrogen peroxide and glucose. Analyst 137:1706–1712Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yang C, Chao SX, Xiao F, Jian J, Wang J (2011) Gas sensing properties of CuO nanorods synthesized by a microwave-assisted hydrothermal method. Sensors Actuators B Chem 158:299–303Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Izaki M, Omi T (1996) Electrolyte optimization for cathodic growth of zinc oxide films. J Electrochem Soc 143:L53–L55Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yoshida T, Komatsu D, Shimokawa N, Minoura H (2004) Mechanism of cathodic electrodeposition of zinc oxide thin films from aqueous zinc nitrate baths. Thin Solid Films 451:166–169Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Vanysek P (2000) Electrochemical series. CRC Handbook Chem Phys 8Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Katwal R, Kaur H, Sharma G, Naushad M, Pathania D (2015) Electrochemical synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic and antimicrobial activity. J Ind Eng Chem 31:173–184Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zhang C, Chen J, Zeng Y, Rui X, Zhu J, Zhang W, Xu C, Lim TM, Hng HH, Yan Q (2012) A facile approach toward transition metal oxide hierarchical structures and their lithium storage properties. Nanoscale 4:3718–3724Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zhang Y, Wang S, Li X, Chen L, Qian Y, Zhang Z (2006) CuO shuttle-like nanocrystals synthesized by oriented attachment. J Cryst Growth 291:196–201Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wang W, Liu Z, Liu Y, Xu C, Zheng C, Wang G (2003) A simple wet-chemical synthesis and characterization of CuO nanorods. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 76:417–420Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lu C, Qi L, Yang J, Zhang D, Wu N, Ma J (2004) Simple template-free solution route for the controlled synthesis of Cu(OH)2 and CuO nanostructures. J Phys Chem B 108:17825–17831Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wang W, Wang L, Shi H, Liang Y (2012) A room temperature chemical route for large scale synthesis of sub-15 nm ultralong CuO nanowires with strong size effect and enhanced photocatalytic activity. Cryst Eng Comm 14:5914–5922Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Vaseem M, Umar A, Kim SH, Hahn YB (2008) Low-temperature synthesis of flower-shaped CuO nanostructures by solution process: formation mechanism and structural properties. J Phys Chem C 112:5729–5735Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Dey KK, Kumar A, Shanker R, Dhawan A, Wan M, YadavRR, and Srivastava AK (2012), Growth morphologies, phase formation, optical & biological responses of nanostructures of CuO and their application as cooling fluid in high energy density devices, RSC Adv 2: 1387–1403Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Mukherjee N, Show B, Maji SK, Madhu U, Bhar SK, Mitra BC, Khan GG, Mondal A (2011) CuO nano-whiskers: electrodeposition, Raman analysis, photoluminescence study and photocatalytic activity. Mater Lett 65:3248–3250Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Liu J, Jin J, Deng Z, Huang SZ, Hu ZY, Wang L, Wang C, Chen LH, Li Y, Tendeloo GV, Su B-L (2012) Tailoring CuO nanostructures for enhanced photocatalytic property. J Colloid Interface Sci 384:1–9Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Etefagh R, Azhir E, Shahtahmasebi N (2013) Synthesis of CuO nanoparticles and fabrication of nanostructural layer biosensors for detecting Aspergillus niger fungi. Sci Iran 20:1055–1058Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sun S, Zhang J, Wang L, Song X, Yang Z (2013) Surfactant-free CuO mesocrystals with controllable dimensions: green ordered-aggregation-driven synthesis, formation mechanism and their photochemical performances. Cryst Eng Comm 15:867–877Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gao T, Meng G, Wang Y, Sun S, Zhang L (2001) Electrochemical synthesis of copper nanowires. J Phys Condens Matter 3:355Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Yang X, Chen S, Zhao S, Li D, Ma H (2003) Synthesis of copper nanorods using electrochemical methods. J Serb Chem Soc 68:843–847Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of GuilanRashtIran

Personalised recommendations