Advertisement

Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry

, Volume 17, Issue 7, pp 1961–1965 | Cite as

Investigation of the gas evolution in lithium ion batteries: effect of free lithium compounds in cathode materials

Original Paper

Abstract

The evolution of gas in lithium ion batteries (LIBs) was investigated. The large amount of gas emission related to a charged cathode has been a critical issue because it causes deformation and performance degradation of LIBs. This study examined the effect of free lithium compounds such as Li2CO3 or LiOH on gas generation, which revealed several different features comparing with gas generation related to the cathode active materials themselves: CO2 was the main gas generated, chain-structured carbonate solvents such as dimethyl carbonate or ethyl methyl carbonate generated more gas than cyclic-structured ethylene carbonate, and the gas generation did not occur without LiPF6 in the electrolyte solution. These were found to be the main reason for the different gas-generating behaviors between LiCoO2 (LCO) and LiNi0.85Co0.12Al0.03O2 (NCA) cathodes. For LCO, which has a very small amount of free lithium compounds on the surface, the gas was generated mainly by a reaction between delithiated LCO itself and the electrolyte solution, whereas a considerable amount of gas was generated by surface free lithium for NCA. Therefore, the removal of free lithium compounds is essential, particularly for NCA, to prevent the swelling of LIBs.

Keywords

Lithium ion batteries Cathode Gas evolution Active materials Electrolyte solution 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Inha University Research Grant (INHA-2012).

References

  1. 1.
    Dominey LA (1994) Lithium batteries. Elsevier, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nazri GA, Pistoia G (2004) Lithium batteries: Science and technology. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yoshizawa H, Ohzuku T (2007) J Power Sources 174:813–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim Y (2012) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:2329–2333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumai K, Miyashiro H, Kobayashi Y, Takei K, Ishikawa R (1999) J Power Sources 81:715–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kong W, Li H, Huang X, Chen L (2005) J Power Sources 142:285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holzapfel M, Würsig A, Scheifele W, Vetter J, Novák P (2007) J Power Sources 174:1156–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim Y, Kim D, Kang S (2011) Chem Mater 23:5388–5397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arai H, Okada S, Sakurai Y, Yamaki J (1998) Solid State Ionics 109:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim Y, Lee H, Kang S (2012) J Mater Chem 22:12874–12881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanamura K, Toriyama S, Shiraishi S, Takehara Z (1995) J Electrochem Soc 142:1383–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang X, Pugh J, Ross P (2001) J Electrochem Soc 148:E183–E188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringInha UniversityIncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations