Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry

, Volume 13, Issue 7, pp 991–997 | Cite as

A model for high-surface-area porous Nafion™-bonded cathodes operating in hydrogen–oxygen proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs)

Original Paper

Abstract

A critical discussion of dioxygen reduction kinetics using the Tafel (for the irreversible cathode process) and the Butler–Volmer (anode process) rate equations has been used to evaluate the accuracy of “standard” modeling interpretations of experimental cell potential current (EI) plots. The potential–current curve for what is believed to be an optimized Nafion™-bonded fuel cell cathode was analyzed. It appears to behave as a well-ordered diffusional system and shows high electrocatalyst utilization based on its electrocatalytic and gas diffusion characteristics. The electrode appears to perform as expected, without any anomalous characteristics showing any lower than expected electrocatalyst utilization. Any improvement in electrode performance, which is certainly desirable, seems to demand an improved diffusional structure, barring any potential (although unlikely) change in electrochemical kinetic characteristics.

Keywords

Electrocatalysis Dioxygen reduction PEMFCs Porous electrodes Electrode models 

References

  1. 1.
    Neyerlin KC, Gu W, Jorne J, Gasteiger HA (2007) J Electrochem Soc 154:B631. doi: 10.1149/1.2733987 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Franco AA, Schott P, Jallut C, Maschke B (2006) J Electrochem Soc 153:A1053. doi: 10.1149/1.2188353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Franco AA, Tembely M (2007) J Electrochem Soc 154:B712. doi: 10.1149/1.2731040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuhn H, Wokaun A, Scherrer GG (2007) Electrochim Acta 52:2322. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim J, Lee SM, Srinivasan S, Chamberlain CE (1995) J Electrochem Soc 142:2670. doi: 10.1149/1.2050072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Squadrito G, Maggio G, Passalacqua E, Lufrano F, Patti A (1999) J Appl Electrochem 29:1449. doi: 10.1023/A:1003890219394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chu D, Jiang R (1999) J Power Sources 142:226. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(98)00263-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Passalacqua E, Lufrano F, Squadrito G, Patti A, Giorgi L (2001) Electrochim Acta 46:799. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00679-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bard AJ, Faulkner LR (1980) Electrochemical methods. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vogel W, Lundquist J, Ross PN, Stonehart P (1975) Electrochim Acta 20:79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stonehart P, Ross PN (1975) Catal Rev 12:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Damjanovic A, Brusic V (1967) Electrochim Acta 12:615. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(67)85030-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marković NM Ross PN (1999) In: Wieckowski A (ed) Interfacial electrochemistry, theory, experiment, and applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 821Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stamenkovic VR, Fowler B, Mun BS, Wang G, Ross PN, Lucas CA, Marković NM (2007) Science 315:493. doi: 10.1126/science.1135941 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stamenkovic VR, Mun BS, Arenz M, Mayrhofer JJ, Lucas CA, Wang G, Ross PN, Marković NM (2007) Nature Materials 6:241. doi: 10.1038/nmat1840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Appleby AJ (1973) J Electrochem Soc 120:1205. doi: 10.1149/1.2403662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Appleby AJ (2008) Electrochim Acta (to be published)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Appleby AJ (1974) In: Conway BE, Bockris JOM (eds) Modern aspects of electrochemistry, vol 9. Plenum, New York, p 369Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Antoine O, Bultel Y, Durand R (2001) J Electroanal Chem 499:85. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(00)00492-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fischer A, Jindra J, Wendt H (1998) J Appl Electrochem 28:277. doi: 10.1023/A:1003259531775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Electrochemical Systems and Hydrogen ResearchTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations