A model for high-surface-area porous Nafion™-bonded cathodes operating in hydrogen–oxygen proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs)
- 101 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
A critical discussion of dioxygen reduction kinetics using the Tafel (for the irreversible cathode process) and the Butler–Volmer (anode process) rate equations has been used to evaluate the accuracy of “standard” modeling interpretations of experimental cell potential current (E–I) plots. The potential–current curve for what is believed to be an optimized Nafion™-bonded fuel cell cathode was analyzed. It appears to behave as a well-ordered diffusional system and shows high electrocatalyst utilization based on its electrocatalytic and gas diffusion characteristics. The electrode appears to perform as expected, without any anomalous characteristics showing any lower than expected electrocatalyst utilization. Any improvement in electrode performance, which is certainly desirable, seems to demand an improved diffusional structure, barring any potential (although unlikely) change in electrochemical kinetic characteristics.
Keywords
Electrocatalysis Dioxygen reduction PEMFCs Porous electrodes Electrode modelsReferences
- 1.Neyerlin KC, Gu W, Jorne J, Gasteiger HA (2007) J Electrochem Soc 154:B631. doi: 10.1149/1.2733987 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Franco AA, Schott P, Jallut C, Maschke B (2006) J Electrochem Soc 153:A1053. doi: 10.1149/1.2188353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Franco AA, Tembely M (2007) J Electrochem Soc 154:B712. doi: 10.1149/1.2731040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kuhn H, Wokaun A, Scherrer GG (2007) Electrochim Acta 52:2322. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Kim J, Lee SM, Srinivasan S, Chamberlain CE (1995) J Electrochem Soc 142:2670. doi: 10.1149/1.2050072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Squadrito G, Maggio G, Passalacqua E, Lufrano F, Patti A (1999) J Appl Electrochem 29:1449. doi: 10.1023/A:1003890219394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Chu D, Jiang R (1999) J Power Sources 142:226. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(98)00263-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Passalacqua E, Lufrano F, Squadrito G, Patti A, Giorgi L (2001) Electrochim Acta 46:799. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00679-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Bard AJ, Faulkner LR (1980) Electrochemical methods. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 10.Vogel W, Lundquist J, Ross PN, Stonehart P (1975) Electrochim Acta 20:79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Stonehart P, Ross PN (1975) Catal Rev 12:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Damjanovic A, Brusic V (1967) Electrochim Acta 12:615. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(67)85030-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Marković NM Ross PN (1999) In: Wieckowski A (ed) Interfacial electrochemistry, theory, experiment, and applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 821Google Scholar
- 14.Stamenkovic VR, Fowler B, Mun BS, Wang G, Ross PN, Lucas CA, Marković NM (2007) Science 315:493. doi: 10.1126/science.1135941 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Stamenkovic VR, Mun BS, Arenz M, Mayrhofer JJ, Lucas CA, Wang G, Ross PN, Marković NM (2007) Nature Materials 6:241. doi: 10.1038/nmat1840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Appleby AJ (1973) J Electrochem Soc 120:1205. doi: 10.1149/1.2403662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Appleby AJ (2008) Electrochim Acta (to be published)Google Scholar
- 18.Appleby AJ (1974) In: Conway BE, Bockris JOM (eds) Modern aspects of electrochemistry, vol 9. Plenum, New York, p 369Google Scholar
- 19.Antoine O, Bultel Y, Durand R (2001) J Electroanal Chem 499:85. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(00)00492-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Fischer A, Jindra J, Wendt H (1998) J Appl Electrochem 28:277. doi: 10.1023/A:1003259531775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar