Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry

, Volume 11, Issue 8, pp 1071–1076 | Cite as

Lithium-ion conduction in elastomeric binder in Li-ion batteries

  • Mayumi Kaneko
  • Masanobu Nakayama
  • Masataka WakiharaEmail author
Original Paper


This paper describes two kinds of elastomeric binders which are styrene–butadiene (ST–BD) copolymer and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate–acrylonitrile (2EHA–AN) copolymer for electrode materials of rechargeable Li-ion batteries. These elastomeric binders were swollen by electrolyte solution (EC/DEC=1/2, 1 M LiPF6), and 2EHA–AN copolymer retained larger amount of electrolyte solution than ST–BD copolymer. The Li-ionic conduction behavior was investigated for both copolymer films swollen by electrolyte solution. The Li-ion conductivity of ST–BD copolymer was 9.45 × 10−8 S·cm−1 and that of 2EHA–AN copolymer was 1.25 × 10−5 S·cm−1 at room temperature, and the corresponding amounts of activation energy were 0.31 and 0.26 eV, respectively. Because the observed activation energy in elastomeric binder was different from that in the bulk of electrolyte solution (0.09 eV), Li-ion conduction of the bulk of elastomeric binder swollen by electrolyte was affected by the polymer structure of binders. Electrochemical performance of cathode material, LiCoO2, was investigated with three kinds of binders: ST–BD copolymer, 2EHA–AN copolymer, and poly(vinylidene fluoride). The initial charge–discharge capacity of the LiCoO2 electrode with 2EHA–AN copolymer showed highest capacity, suggesting that Li+-ion conduction inside of the elastomeric binder contributes to the enhancement of charging and discharging capacity. This result indicates that elastomeric binder with sufficient Li-ionic conductivity can be an attractive candidate for improving cathode of lithium-ion battery.


Ionic Conductivity Electrolyte Solution Polymer Electrolyte Discharge Capacity Electrochemical Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Du Pasquier A, Disma F, Bowmer T, Gozdz AS, Amatucci G, Tarascon JM (1998) J Electrochem Soc 145:472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maleki H, Deng G, Anani A, Howard J (1999) J Electrochem Soc 146:3224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roth EP et al (2004) J Power Sources 134:222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee JH et al (2005) J Electrochem Soc 152:A1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buqa H et al (2006) J Power Sources 161(1):617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaneko M, Guerfi A, Charest P, Mori M, Zaghi K (2004) 206th meeting of the ECS; extended abstract 412, Honolulu, Hawaii, 7 October 2004Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guerfi A, Kaneko M, Charest P, Mori M, Zaghib K (2006) J Power Sources (in press)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akashi H, Tanaka K, Sekai K (1998) J Electrochem Soc 145:881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meyer WH (1998) Adv Mater 10:439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Song JY, Wang YY, Wan CC (1999) J Power Sources 77:183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Osaka T, Liu X, Nojima M, Momma T (1999) J Electrochem Soc 146:1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matsuda Y, Morita M, Tsutsumi H (1993) J Power Sources 43/44:439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reich S, Michaeli I (1975) J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 13:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watanabe M, Kanda M, Nagaoka K, Shinohara I (1983) J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 21:939CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mayumi Kaneko
    • 1
    • 2
  • Masanobu Nakayama
    • 2
  • Masataka Wakihara
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Zeon Corporation, R&D CenterKawasaki, KanagawaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Applied ChemistryTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations