Advertisement

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 415–421 | Cite as

Prospective study to evaluate the influence of joint washing and the use of hyaluronic acid on 111 arthrocentesis

  • Marina A. Gavin ClaveroEmail author
  • Ma Victoria Simón Sanz
  • Andrea Mur Til
  • Julia Blasco Palacio
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Temporomandibular dysfunction is a generic term that covers a large number of clinical problems affecting not only temporomandibular joint but also the masticatory musculature and related structures. Arthrocentesis is used in patients with joint pathology in which conservative treatment has failed.

Methods

A prospective, observational, analytical cohort study has been carried out to evaluate the results of 111 arthrocentesis. We have performed an inferential statistics study between the variables: improvement of pain and improvement in the oral opening with the variables and access joint, washing joint, hyaluronic acid infiltration, and type of joint pathology.

Results

Joint washing and intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection significantly improved the pain at 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month postarthrocentesis, although this improvement was limited in time, at 6 months, joint washing and hyaluronic acid infiltration are no longer significant. Only the joint access (p = 0.014) and the type of joint pathology (p = 0.028) are significant.

Conclusions

The effectiveness of joint access in the arthrocentesis at 6 months is high, although less than at 1-month and 3-month postarthrocentesis. The type of joint pathology is another important factor. Patients with degenerative pathology worsen the most after 6-month postarthrocentesis. Arthrocentesis could avoid the evolution of acute pathology.

Keywords

Temporomandibular joint dysfunction Arthrocentesis Access temporomandibular joint Lavage temporomandibular joint Hyaluronic infiltration 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article was approved by University Hospital Miguel Servet review board of Zaragoza.

Informed consent

An informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Kaplan AS, Assael LA (1991) Temporomandibular disorders. Diagnosis and treatment, 1st edn. Saunders, Estados UnidosGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nitzan DW (2001) The process of lubrication impairment and its involvement in temporomandibular joint disc displacement: a theoretical concept. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59(1):35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Navarro Vila C (2004) Patología quirúrgica de la articulación temporomandibular: transtornos funcionales. In: Navarro Vila C, García Marín F, Ochandiano Caicoya S (eds) Tratado de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial. Arán, Madrid, pp 266–277Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet J et al (2014) Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network and orofacial pain special interest group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 1(28):6–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goizueta Adame C, Muñoz-Guerra M (2012) The posterior double pass suture in repositioning of the tempromandibular disc during arthroscopic surgery: a report of 16 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40(1):86–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chandrashekhar V, Kenchappa U, Chinnannavar S, Singh S (2015) Arthrocentesis a minimally invasive method for TMJ disc disorders - a prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res 9(10):59–62Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baker Z, Eriksson L, Englesson Sahlström L, Ekberg E (2015) Questionable effect of lavage for treatment of painful jaw movements at disc displacement without reduction: a 3-year randomised controlled follow-up. J Oral Rehabil 42(10):742–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu Y, Lin H, Zhu P, Zhou W, Han Y, Zheng Y et al (2013) A comparative study between use of arthroscopic lavage and arthrocentesis of temporomandibular joint based on computational fluid dynamics analysis. PLoS One 8(11):e78953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skármeta N, Pesce M, Espinoza-Mellado P (2016) A single-puncture arthrocentesis technique, using a peripheral intravenous catheter. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(9):1123–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yura S, Totsuka Y, Yoshikawa T, Inoue N (2003) Can arthrocentesis release intracapsular adhesions? Arthroscopic findings before and after irrigation under sufficient hydraulic pressure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61(11):1253-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu P, Lin H, Zhou Q, Lv J, Zhang Z, Xu Y (2017) Dynamic evaluation of lavage efficacy in upper compartment of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 75(2):276–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nitzan D, Dolwick M (1991) An alternative explanation for the genesis of closed-lock symptoms in the internal derangement process. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49(8):810–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manfredini D, Piccotti F, Guarda-Nardini L (2010) Hyaluronic acid in the treatment of TMJ disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Cranio. 28(3):166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alpaslan G, Alpaslan C (2001) Efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with and without injection of sodium hyaluronate in treatment of internal derangements. J OralMaxillofac Surg 59(6):613–618Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guarda-Nardini L, Rossi A, Arboretti R, Bonnini S, Stellini E (2015) Single- or multiple-session viscosupplementation protocols for temporomandibular joint degenerative disorders: a randomized clinical trial. J OralRehabil 42(7):521–528Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manfredini D, Bonnini S, Robretti R, Guarda-Nardini L (2009) Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: an open label trial of 76 patients treated with arthorcentesis plus hyaluronic acid injections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(8):827–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Triantaffilidou K, Venetis G, Bika O (2013) Efficacy of hyaluronic acid injections in patients with osteoarthritis of the temporomandibular join. A comparative study. J Craniofac Surg 24(6):2006–2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gurung T, Singh R, Mohammad S, Pal U, Mahdi A, Kumar M (2017) Efficacy of arthorcentesis versus arthorcentesis with sodium hyaluronic acid in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: a comparision. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 8(1):41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morey-Mas MA, Caubet-Biayna J, Varela-Sende L, Iriarte-Ortabe JI (2010) Sodium hyaluronate improves outcomes after arthroscopic lysis and lavage in patients with Wilkes stage III and IV disease. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68(5):1069-74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gorrela H, Prameela J, Srinivas G, Reddy B, Sudhir M, Arakeri G (2017) Efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with sodium hyaluronate in the management of temporomandibular joint disorders: a prospective randomized control trial. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 4(16):479–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhong W, Zhou G (2004) Intraarticular injection-dilatation and later lavage plus viscosupplementation of TMJ for the treatment of anterior disc displacement without reduction. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 13(1):23–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yeung R, Chow R, Samman N, Chiu K (2006) Short-term therapeutic outcome of intra-articular high molecular weight hyaluronic acid injection for nonreducing disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102(4):453–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tuncel U (2012 Diciembre) Repeated sodium hyaluronate injections following multiple arthrocenteses in the treatment of early stage reducing disc displacement of the temporomandibular join: a preliminary report. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40(8):685–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Honda K, Yasukawa Y, Fujiwara M, Abe T, Urade M (2011) Causes of persistent joint pain after arthrocentesis of temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(9):2111–2115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vos L, Huddleston Slater J, Stegenga B (2014) Arthrocentesis as initial treatment for temporomandibular joint arthropathy: a randomized controlled trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 5(42):e134–e139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hosgor H, Bas B, Celenk C (2017) A comparison of the outcomes of four minimally invasive treatment methods for anterior disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 11(43):1403–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schieffman E, Look J, Hodges J, Swift J, Decker K, Hathaway D et al (2007) Randomized effectiveness study of four therapeutic strategies for TMJ closed lock. J Dent Res 86(1):58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sahlström L, Ekberg E, List T, Petersson A, Eriksson L (2013) Lavage treatment of painful jaw movements at disc displacement without reduction. A randomized controlled trial in a short-term perspective. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(3):356–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tatli U, Benlidayi M, Ekren O, Salimov F (2017) Comparison of the effectiveness of three different treatment methods for temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(5):603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gouveia M, Barbalho J, Pereira Júnior E, Nascimento M, Vasconcelos B (2015) Effectiveness and satisfaction evaluation of patients submitted to TMJ arthrocenthesis: a case series. Braz Oral Res 29(50):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Diraçoğlu D, Saral I, Keklik B, Kurt H, Emekli U, Ozçakar L et al (2009) Arthrocentesis versus nonsurgical methods in the treatment of temporomandibular disc displacement without reduction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1(108):3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bouchard C, Goulet J, El-Ouazzani M, Turgeon A (2017) Temporomandibular lavage versus nonsurgical treatments for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 7(75):1352–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina A. Gavin Clavero
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ma Victoria Simón Sanz
    • 2
  • Andrea Mur Til
    • 2
  • Julia Blasco Palacio
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUniversity Hospital Joan XXIIITarragonaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUniversity Hospital Miguel ServetZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations