Twenty four years of oral and maxillofacial surgery malpractice claims in Spain: patient safety lessons to learn
- 43 Downloads
Oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) malpractice risk is of special interest due to both the aesthetic component of some procedures and the complexity of the pathologies involved. This study aims to identify relevant factors involved in OMS professional liability (PL) claims to help achive better management of risks and improve patient safety.
We performed a retrospective analysis of 315 OMS claims opened between 1990 and 2014 from the database of the PL Department of the Catalonian Council of Medical Colleges, and identified their clinical, economical and juridical characteristics.
OMS showed a high rate of compensation (33.8%). Dental implant surgery, third molar surgery and rhinoplasty presented the greatest exposure to claims, and in these cases, lack of osteointegration of dental implants, neurologic injury of inferior dentoalveolar/lingual nerves and a poor aesthetic result were the most frequently compensated sequelae. Statistically, significant association was found between this perioperative complications group and the presence of PL. Poorly documented patient information (informed consent document) was also significantly related with PL outcome.
OMS is a specialty of medium risk for claims, especially oral surgery cases. Surgical complications, such as neurologic damage after oral/head and neck procedures and poor aesthetic results, do occur and deserve special attention to improve patient safety, as well as patient-information procedure.
KeywordsMalpractice Claims analysis Professional liability Patient safety
The Professional Liability Department of the Council of Physicians Colleges of Catalonia had the financial support by the Spanish Ministry of Health (FIS10/00598).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The research was carried out by the Professional Liability Department of the Council of Physicians Colleges of Catalonia.
The Professional Liability Department of the Council of Physicians Colleges of Catalonia has the ethical approval to analyse records of claims by the Ethics Committee of the Barcelona’s College of Physicians.
There was no a priori informed consent for the use of data, regarding this record review. Any identifying information from the data set was removed before analysis and treated confidentially.
- 2.World Health Organization (WHO) (2002) Quality of care: patient safety. Resolution WHA55.18. WHO, Geneva Available at: http://apps.who.int/gb/archive/pdf_files/WHA55/ewha5518.pdf. Accessed July 2018Google Scholar
- 9.Arimany-Manso J (2007) La medicina defensiva: un peligroso boomerang. Humanitas, Humanidades Médicas 12:8–26Google Scholar
- 10.Wilson N, Strunk AL (2006) Survey on professional liability. ACOG Clin Rev 12:13–16Google Scholar
- 25.Arimany-Manso J, Aragonés Rodríguez L, Benet-Travé J, Martin-Fumadó C, Bruguera Villagrasa R, Fuz F, Gómez-Durán EL (2018) Reclamaciones por cirugía en sitio erróneo (1986-2017). An Sist Sanit Navar 41. https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0309
- 26.Saigí-Ullastre U, Gómez-Durán EL, Arimany-Manso J (2013) Quantification of the loss of opportunity in professional medical responsibility. Rev Esp Med Legal 39(4):157–161Google Scholar