Advertisement

Tridimensional virtual planning protocol for double-jaw orthognathic surgery with mandible first surgical sequence

  • Eduardo Varela Parente
  • Fernando AntoniniEmail author
  • Gustavo Zanardi
  • Rogério Miranda Pagnoncelli
Author's reply
  • 1 Downloads

Introduction

Three-dimensional virtual treatment planning has greatly enhanced the efficiency and accuracy of dentofacial deformity correction through orthognathic surgery [1]. Moreover, the advent of rigid internal fixation has allowed a change in this classical sequence. Performing mandibular surgery first presents several advantages and surgeons must consider some indications in order to achieve better results, and the ability of the surgeon to reproduce the treatment plan in the operating room is essential [2]. Most of orthognathic surgery treatment plan has been performed by traditional sequence, but the surgery itself was performed using an inverted sequence. However, repositioning the lower jaw first during three-dimensional virtual planning, as well as in actual surgery, can be really advantageous. The purpose of this paper is to suggest a protocol for double-jaw orthognathic surgery repositioning the mandible first in both three-dimensional virtual planning and surgery itself.

Notes

Acknowledgments

None. All the contributors of the manuscript are listed as the manuscript authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Ethical approval

Not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Stephen A, Schendel SA, Jacobson R, Khalessi S (2013) 3-Dimensional facial simulation in orthognathic surgery: is it accurate? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:1406–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ellis E, Perez D (2011) Sequencing bimaxillary surgery: mandible first. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:2217–2224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Epker BN, Stella JP, Fish LC (1995) Dentofacial deformities. Mosby-Year Book, St LouisGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arnett GA, Bergman RT (1993) Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 103(4):299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaipatur NR, Flores-Mir C (2009) Accuracy of computer programs in predicting orthognathic surgery soft tissue response. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:751–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, Yuan P, Chen KC, Li J, Zhang X, Tang Z, Alfi DM (2015) Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol: part 1: planning sequence. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(12):1431–1440CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang YC, Ko EW, Huang CS, Chen YR (2006) The inter-relationship between mandibular autorotation and maxillary LeFort I impaction osteotomies. J Craniofac Surg 17(5):898–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lou XT, Shen GF, Feng YM, Fang B, Wu Y, Zhu M (2014) Inter-relationship between mandibular rotation center and maxillary Le Fort I impaction osteotomies. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 23(6):704–707Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nadjmi N, Mommaerts MY, Abeloos JV, De Clercq CA (1998) Prediction of mandibular autorotation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56(11):1241–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xia J, Ip HH, Samman N et al (2000) Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D virtual osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29(1):11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu Z, Shen S, Xia JJ, Wang X (2015) A modified method of proximal segment alignment after sagittal split osteotomy for patients with mandibular asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73:2399–2407CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharifi A, Jones R, Ayoub A, Moos K, Walker F, Khambay B, McHugh S (2008) How accurate is model planning for orthognathic surgery? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37(12):1089–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Posnick JC, Ricalde P, Ng P (2006) A modified approach to “model planning” in orthognathic surgery for patients without a reliable centric relation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(2):347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Varela Parente
    • 1
  • Fernando Antonini
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Gustavo Zanardi
    • 4
  • Rogério Miranda Pagnoncelli
    • 5
  1. 1.Private PracticeFlorianópolisBrazil
  2. 2.UNESC School of DentistryCriciúmaBrazil
  3. 3.PhD Student, OMFS DepartmentPUCRS School of DentistryPorto AlegreBrazil
  4. 4.Private PracticeBalneário CamboriúBrazil
  5. 5.Assistant Professor, PUCRS School of DentistryPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations