Advertisement

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 275–280 | Cite as

Comparison of intravenous tramadol versus ketorolac in the management of postoperative pain after oral and maxillofacial surgery

  • Saikrishna DegalaEmail author
  • Asad Nehal
Original Article
  • 133 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the better postoperative analgesic, tramadol, and ketorolac, in patients with maxillofacial trauma and who had undergone maxillofacial surgery, i.e., open reduction internal fixation, under general anesthesia.

Materials and methods

After taking ethical approval from the institution and informed consent, 46 ASA grade I–II patients were block randomized (ABAB) based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and equally divided into two groups in which one group of patients was given intravenous tramadol 100 mg and another group of patients was given intravenous ketorolac 30 mg at the time of closure of skin and was repeated after 8 and 16 h following surgery. Pain using VAS at the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th, and 24th postoperative was assessed, and association of results was compared using Cramer’s V test SPSS (Version 22). Vital signs and side effects were recorded.

Results

Although both drugs resulted in significant decrease in pain intensity from the 2nd to 24th postoperative hour, intravenous tramadol always resulted in better pain control than intravenous ketorolac at every postoperative hour (p value < 0.05) except at 2nd hour where changes are non-significant (p value > 0.05).

Conclusion

Apart from first 2 h where the changes are non-significant, this study clearly demonstrates the advantage of the intravenous tramadol in the management of postoperative pain and ease of administration in postoperative patient through IV cannula. The side effects of both the drugs were insignificant and did not have any effect on the result.

Keywords

ASA grades Analgesics Intramuscular Intravenous Ketorolac ORIF Tramadol Visual analogue scale 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was performed on human subjects, and prior ethical clearance was received from the institution ethical committee.

Informed consent

Informed consent about procedure, possible complications, and expected outcomes was explained and taken from each subject.

References

  1. 1.
    Chaturvedi S, Chaturvedi A (2007) Postoperative pain and its management. Indian J Crit Care Med 11(4):204–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colletti V, Carner M, Vincenzi A, Dallari S, Mira E, Benazzo M, Cosentino G, Bellussi L, Passali D (1998) Intramuscular tramadol versus ketorolac in the treatment of pain following nasal surgery: a controlled multicenter trial. Curr Ther Res 59(9):608–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guilllen AP, Rider RM, Banuelos PA, Urizar JP (2007) Pre-emptive analgesic effect of tramadol after mandibular third molar extraction: a pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1315–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prathibha Gopalraju, R M Lalitha, Kavitha Prasad, Krishnappa Ranganath; Comparative study of intravenous tramadol versus ketorolac for preventing postoperative pain after third molar surgery, J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42 (2014) 629–633Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McMohan SB, Kaltzenburg M. Wall and Melzack’s textbook of pain. 5th edi. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 292Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lehmann KA (1994) Tramadol for the management of acute pain. Drugs 47(Suppl 1):19–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shankariah M, Mishra M, Kamath RAD (July–Sept 2012) Tramadol versus ketorolac in the treatment of postoperative pain following maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 11(3):264–270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strom BL, Berlin JA, Kinman JL (1996) Parenteral ketorolac and risk of gastrointestinal and operative site bleeding: a postmarketing surveillance study. JAMA 275:376–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, J.S.S. Dental College & Hospital (Constituent College)Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara UniversityMysuruIndia

Personalised recommendations