Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 25–37 | Cite as

Most cited publications in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a bibliometric analysis

  • Nawaf Aslam-PervezEmail author
  • Joshua E. Lubek
Original Article



Citation is one of the most important forms of acknowledgment and recognition received by our peers in academia. This study identifies and characterizes the current topmost highly cited publications in journals specifically dedicated to the specialty. The purpose of this study is to identify, using the citation count, works that have made key contributions in the field and to provide insight into the direction the specialty has taken in the last 30 years.


Four journals that were dedicated to the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) were selected. The SCOPUS database was utilized to perform a citation analysis on the top 200 publications in the month of May, 2017. Each publication was individually reviewed for the number of citations, the source journal of the manuscript, its year of publications, the article type, the country of origin, the study type, and the level of evidence. We categorized every manuscript within a subspecialty.


The number of citations ranged from 2824 to 118 over the last four decades. The majority of the manuscripts were published in the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (60.5%) followed by the International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (25%). Only 3% of these publications were of level I evidence. The most frequent field of publication was benign pathology (18.5%) followed by dental implantology (19%) and then craniomaxillofacial trauma (12%) and craniomaxillofacial deformities (12%). The majority of the publications were articles, of which 59.5% were case-control, case series, or cohort studies. Nine of the top 20 most cited articles and 12.5% of all the most cited papers were related to osteoradionecrosis, osteochemonecrosis, and bisphosphonates. The majority of these publications originated in the USA (44%), followed by Sweden (9.20%), the Netherlands and UK (7.76%), and Germany (5.82%).


Despite considerable advances in the quality of both clinical and laboratory research, only six level I studies were identified. Osteonecrosis/bisphosphonates and platelet-rich plasma were frequent topics indicating the recent interests in these fields. The USA has continued to play a major role in the research; however, there needs to be more international, multi-institutional cooperative collaborations.


Oral surgery Maxillofacial surgery Bibliometrics Citation Pathology Malignant pathology Osteonecrosis MRONJ ORN Osteoradionecrosis Trauma TMJ Temporomandibular joint surgery Craniofacial deformities Implants Dentoalveolar surgery Bone graft 


Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval was not required. Informed consent was not required for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Garfield E (1977) Introducing citation classics: the human side of scientific reports. Curr Contents 3:5–6Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang W-J et al (2012) Classic citations in main plastic and reconstructive surgery journals. Ann Plast Surg 71:1Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heldwein FL, Rhoden EL, Morgentaler A (2010) Classics of urology: a half century history of the most frequently cited articles (1955–2009). Urology 75:1261–1268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lefaivre KA, Shadgan B, O’Brien PJ (2011) 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1487–1497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L (2002) One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg 26:1099–1105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ponce FA, Lozano AM (2010) Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part I: the 100 top-cited papers in neurosurgical journals. J Neurosurg 112:223–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahmad SS, Ahmad SS, Kohl S, Ahmad S, Ahmed A R (2015) The hundred most cited articles in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 25:900–909.
  8. 8.
    Fenton JE, Roy D, Hughes JP Jones AS (2002) A century of citation classics in otolaryngology-head and neck Surgery journals. J Laryngol Otol 116:494–498 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Obwegeser H (1964) The indications for surgical correction of mandibular deformity by the sagittal splitting technique. Br. J Oral Surg 1:157–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Oral-Head and Neck Surgery/Microvascular SurgeryUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations