Comparison of intraoperative time measurements between osseous reconstructions with free fibula flaps applying computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured and conventional techniques
We aimed to determine whether computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) techniques could save intraoperative time compared with the conventional technique, by comparing flap harvesting and ischemia times, and subsequently impact flap survival.
Twenty patients underwent concurrent osteocutaneous fibula flaps, either with (n = 10) or without (n = 10) the CAD/CAM technique. Demographic data, clinical history, complications, number of osseous segments, and times for virtual planning, flap harvesting, flap ischemia, tourniquet inflation, and total reconstruction were recorded.
There was no significant difference between CAD/CAM and conventional techniques with respect to age, number of osseous segments, complication rates, and tourniquet inflation time. Flap harvesting times were significantly shorter in the conventional group (112.1 vs. 142.2 min, p < 0.001), while flap ischemia and total ischemia times were significantly shorter in the CAD/CAM group (70.7 vs. 98.6 min, p < 0.001; 174.8 vs. 198.9 min, p = 0.002, respectively). However, while total reconstruction time did not differ between groups, overall operating time (including the amount of virtual planning time and surgical reconstruction time) was significantly longer in the CAD/CAM group (mean 256.0 vs. 210.7 min, p < 0.001).
Despite the advantages of the CAD/CAM technique, including reduced ischemia time of osteocutaneous fibula flaps, there is no impact on total reconstruction time or flap survival.
KeywordsFibula flap Reconstruction Virtual surgery CAD/CAM Ischemia time Flap survival
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 2.Mazzoni S, Marchetti C, Sgarzani R, Cipriani R, Scotti R et al (2013) Prosthetically guided maxillofacial surgery: evaluation of the accuracy of a surgical guide and custom-made bone plate in oncology patients after mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1376–1385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Hou J, Chen M, Pan CB, Tao Q, Wang JG, Wang C, Zhang B, Huang HZ (2011) Immediate reconstruction of bilateral mandible defects: management based on computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing rapid prototyping technology in combination with vascularized fibular osteomyocutaneous flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1792–1797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Hirsch DL, Garfein ES, Christensen AM, Weimer KA, Saddeh PB, Levine JP (2009) Use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to produce orthognathically ideal surgical outcomes: a paradigm shift in head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2115–2122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Schepers RH, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Lahoda LU, Van der Meer WJ, Roodenburg JL, Reintsema H, Witjes MJ (2013) Fully 3-dimensional digitally planned reconstruction of a mandible with a free vascularized fibula and immediate placement of an implant-supported prosthetic construction. Head Neck 35:E109–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Ayoub N, Ghassemi A, Rana M, Gerressen M, Riediger D, Hölzle F, Modabber A (2014) Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial. Trials 15:114PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Hayden RE (2014) Reconstruction of the composite oromandibular defect: fibular free flap. In: Genden EM (ed) Reconstructive surgery, 1st edn. Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia, pp 103–116Google Scholar
- 27.Succo G, Berrone M, Battiston B, Tos P, Goia F, Appendino P, Crosetti E (2014) Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning. Eur Arch OtorhinolaryngolGoogle Scholar