Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 201–205 | Cite as

Conservative management of unilateral condylar hyperplasia

  • Rajkumar GC
  • Hemavathy Muralidoss
  • Shashikala Ramaiah
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to eliminate orthodontic treatment in mild to moderate cases of condylar hyperplasia in its early stages by condylectomy.

Patients and methods

A total of five patients (two females and three males) aged between 17 and 40 years were treated with unilateral condylectomy of the involved side without orthodontic treatment. All patients underwent standardized clinical and radiological examination at initial consultation, before surgery, immediately after surgery, and follow-up. Objective and subjective evaluation of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) included maximal incisal opening, lateral excursions, correction of facial asymmetry, occlusal harmony, TMJ pain, and jaw function. Results were recorded at 5-year follow-up.

Results

In all our cases, we achieved good mouth opening and near to normal occlusion. Good facial aesthetics was obtained after 3 months postoperative follow-up without secondary orthodontic treatment.

Conclusion

Thus, we conclude that treatment of mild to moderate cases of unilateral condylar hyperplasia during the inactive phase can be treated with condylectomy without orthodontic treatment, and it significantly improves long-term surgical outcomes.

Keywords

Condylar hyperplasia Hemimandibular elongation Hemifacial hypertrophy Unilateral micrognathia 

References

  1. 1.
    Bruce RA, Hayward JR (1968) Condylar hyperplasia and mandibular asymmetry. J Oral Surg 26:281–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gray RJ et al (1990) Histopathological and scintigraphic features of condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. doi:10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80196-1
  3. 3.
    Egyedi P (1969) Aetiology of condylar hyperplasia. Aust Dent J 14:12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slootweg PJ, Muller H (1986) Condylar hyperplasia. A clinic—pathological analysis of 22 cases. J Maxillofac Surg. doi:10.1016/s031-0503(86)80291-0
  5. 5.
    Gottileb OP (1951) Hyperplasia of mandibular condyle. J Oral Surg 9:118–135Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jacobsen PU, Lund K (1972) Unilateral growth and remodeling processes after fracture of mandibular condyle: a longitudinal radiographic study. Scand J Dent Res 80:68–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thoma KH (1945) Hyperostosis of mandibular condyle with report of two cases. Oral Surg 31:597–607Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gerry RG, Sangstone RE (1946) Congenital mandibular deformities in newborn infants. Am L Orthod 32:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Normann JE, Painter DM (1980) Hyperplasia of mandibular condyle: a historical review of unimportant early cases with a presentation and analysis of twelve patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 8:161Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Linder AS (1991) Early interceptive treatment of asymmetry. Proc Finn Dent Soc 87:159Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaines RE, Lee MB, Crocker DJ (1992) Osteochondroma of mandibular condyle: case report and review of literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. doi:10.1016/0278-2391(92):90287-A
  12. 12.
    Obwegeser HL, Mahek MS (1986) Hemimandibular hyperplasia: hemimandibular elongation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 14:183–208Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Slootweg PJ, Muller H (1986) Condylar hyperplasia. A clinic-pathological analysis of 22 cases. J Maxillofac Surg. doi:10.1016/s031-0503(86)80291-0
  14. 14.
    Wolford LM et al (2002) Efficacy of high condylectomy for management of condylar hyperplasia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.08.001
  15. 15.
    Tochihara S et al (2001) Osteoid osteoma in mandibular condyle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. doi:10.1054/ijom.2001.0121
  16. 16.
    Hodder SC et al (2000) SPECT bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis and management of mandibular condylar hyperplasia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. doi:10.1054/bjom.1999.0209
  17. 17.
    Gray RJ et al (1990) Histopathological and scintigraphic features of condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. doi:10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80196-1
  18. 18.
    Robinson PD, Harris K, Coghlan KC et al (1990) Bone scans and the timing of treatment of condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. doi:10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80402-3
  19. 19.
    Gray RJ et al (1990) Histopathological and scintigraphic features of condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. doi:10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80196-1
  20. 20.
    Motamedi MHK (1996) Treatment of condylar hyperplasia of the mandible using unilateral ramus osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. doi:10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90341-9
  21. 21.
    Muñoz FM et al (1999) Active condylar hyperplasia treated by high condylectomy: report of case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. doi:10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90732-2
  22. 22.
    Choung P, Nam I (1998) An intraoral approach to treatment of condylar hyperplasia or high condylar process fractures using the intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:563–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jonck LM (1981) Condylar hyperplasia. A case of early treatment. Int J Oral Surg. doi:10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80048-8
  24. 24.
    Araz B, Nitzan DW, Brin I (1991) Condylar hyperplasia: remodeling of facial structures following condylectomy Report of two cases. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 6(1):47–55PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajkumar GC
    • 1
  • Hemavathy Muralidoss
    • 1
  • Shashikala Ramaiah
    • 1
  1. 1.M R Ambedkar Dental College and HospitalBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations