Advertisement

Atomistic analysis of the thermomechanical properties of Sn–Ag–Cu solder materials at the nanoscale with the MEAM potential

  • M. Motalab
  • R. Paul
  • S. SahaEmail author
  • S. Mojumder
  • T. Ahmed
  • J. C. Suhling
Original Paper
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Sn–Ag–Cu, commonly known as SAC, is considered to be among the most promising of all lead-free solder alloys. Research aimed at making electronic components smaller has pointed to the possible use of nanosized solder joints in the future. In this study, for the first time, molecular dynamics simulations were used to analyze the thermomechanical properties of SAC solder materials at the nanoscale. The modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) potential was utilized in the simulations of the SAC solder materials. The dimensions of the structures considered were 55 × 55 × 59 Å. Four different SAC solders were studied, with Ag percentages ranging from 1% to 4% (SAC105, SAC205, SAC305, and SAC405). Thus, the effects of the Ag percentage on the thermomechanical properties of the solder at the nanoscale were identified. The impacts of the temperature on the uniaxial tensile properties and coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) values of the SAC solder materials were investigated by performing simulations of the materials at different temperatures. Results suggest that as the Ag percentage increases, the uniaxial tensile strength and CTE of the solder increase whereas the failure strain and thermal conductivity decrease. The results presented should prove useful in the electronic packaging industry.

Keywords

SAC solder Molecular dynamics simulation MEAM potential 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Bradley E (2003) Lead-free solder assembly: impact and opportunity. In: 53rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Plantation, FL, USA, 27–30 May 2003, pp 41–46Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi S, Lee JG, Subramanian KN et al (2002) Microstructural characterization of damage in thermomechanically fatigued Sn-Ag based solder joints. J Electron Mater 31:292–297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-002-0146-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim KS, Huh SH, Suganuma K (2003) Effects of fourth alloying additive on microstructures and tensile properties of Sn-Ag-Cu alloy and joints with Cu. Microelectron Reliab 43:259–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2714(02)00239-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vianco PT, Rejent JA, Kilgo AC (2003) Time-independent mechanical and physical properties of the ternary 95.5Sn-3.9Ag-0.6Cu solder. J Electron Mater 32:142–151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-003-0185-0
  5. 5.
    Chang SY, Huang YC, Lin YM (2010) Mechanical property and fracture behavior characterizations of 96.5Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder joints. J Alloys Compd 490:508–514.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.071
  6. 6.
    Gao F, Nishikawa H, Takemoto T, Qu J (2009) Mechanical properties versus temperature relation of individual phases in Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu lead-free solder alloy. Microelectron Reliab 49:296–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2008.10.010
  7. 7.
    Harrison MR, Vincent JH, Steen HAH (2013) Lead-free reflow soldering for electronics assembly. Solder Surf Mt Tech 13:21–38Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kariya Y, Otsuka M (1998) Mechanical fatigue characteristics of Sn-3.5Ag-X (X = Bi, Cu, Zn and In) solder alloys. J Electron Mater 27:1229–1235.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-998-0074-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Motalab M, Cai Z, Suhling JC, et al (2012) Improved predictions of lead free solder joint reliability that include aging effects. In: 2012 IEEE 62nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 29 May–1 June 2012, pp 513–531Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Basit MM, Motalab M, Roberts JC, et al (2014) The effects of silver content and solidification profile on the Anand constitutive model for SAC lead free solders. In: Fourteenth Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm), Orlando, FL, USA, 27–30 May 2014, pp 488–502Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Motalab M, Cai Z, Suhling JC, Lall P (2012) Determination of Anand constants for SAC solders using stress-strain or creep data. In: 13th InterSociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems. San Diego, CA, USA, 30 May–1 June 2012, pp 910–922Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng F, Gao F, Zhang J et al (2011) Tensile properties and wettability of SAC0307 and SAC105 low Ag lead-free solder alloys. J Mater Sci 46:3424–3429.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5231-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Plumbridge WJ, Gagg CR (1999) Effects of strain rate and temperature on the stress–strain response of solder alloys. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 10:461–468.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008930430875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abtew M, Selvaduray G (2000) Lead-free solders in microelectronics. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 27:95–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-796X(00)00010-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ma H, Suhling JC (2009) A review of mechanical properties of lead-free solders for electronic packaging. J Mater Sci 44:1141–1158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3125-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hasnine M, Mustafa M, Suhling JC, et al (2013) Characterization of aging effects in lead free solder joints using nanoindentation. In: IEEE 63rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 28–31 May 2013, pp 166–178Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saleh G, Xu C, Sanvito S (2018) Ab initio surface properties of Ag–Sn alloys: implications for lead-free soldering. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:4277–4286.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP07551K CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang J, Yang J, Liang L et al (2018) A molecular dynamics investigation of the micro-mechanism for vacancy formation between Ag3Sn and βSn under electromigration. Mol Phys 116:99–106.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2017.1367855
  19. 19.
    Di Maio D, Hunt C (2011) On the absence of the β to α Sn allotropic transformation in solder joints made from paste and metal powder. Microelectron Eng 88:117–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2010.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zeng G, Mcdonald SD, Sweatman K, Nogita K (2014) Tin pest in lead-free solders? Fundamental studies on the effect of impurities on phase transformation kinetics. In: 2014 International Conference on Electronics Packaging (ICEP), Toyama, Japan, 23–25 April 2014, pp 135–139Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kariya Y, Williams N, Gagg C, Plumbridge W (2001) Tin pest in Sn-0.5 wt.% Cu lead-free solder. J Miner Met Mater Soc 53:39–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-001-0101-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang W, Messler RW, Felton LE (1994) Microstructure evolution of eutectic Sn-Ag solder joints. J Electron Mater 23:765–772.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tu PL, Chan YC, Lai JKL (1997) Effect of intermetallic compounds on the thermal fatigue of surface mount solder joints. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Manuf Technol B 20:87–93Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baskes MI (1992) Modified embedded-atom potentials for cubic materials and impurities. Phys Rev B 46:2727–2742.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.2727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dong H, Fan L, Moon K et al (2005) MEAM molecular dynamics study of lead free solder for electronic packaging applications. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 13:1279–1290.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/13/8/006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aguilar JF, Ravelo R, Baskes MI (2000) Morphology and dynamics of 2D Sn-Cu alloys on (100) and (111)Cu surfaces. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 8:335–344.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/8/3/313
  28. 28.
    Lee B-J, Shim J-H, Baskes MI (2003) Semiempirical atomic potentials for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, Al, and Pb based on first and second nearest-neighbor modified embedded atom method. Phys Rev B 68:144112.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.144112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Paul R, Tasnim T, Saha S, Motalab M (2018) Atomistic analysis to characterize the impact of temperature and defects on the mechanical properties of germanene sheet. Mater Res Express 5:015062.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.74.13.6223-6226.2000
  30. 30.
    Rohith P, Sainath G, Choudhary BK (2017) Molecular dynamics simulation studies on the influence of the aspect ratio on tensile deformation and failure behaviour of 〈1 0 0〉 copper nanowires. Comput Mater Sci 138:34–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.06.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Khan AI, Paul R, Subrina S (2017) Characterization of thermal and mechanical properties of stanene nanoribbons: a molecular dynamics study. RSC Adv 7:50485–50495.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra09209a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Paul R, Tasnim T, Dhar R, et al (2017) Study of uniaxial tensile properties of hexagonal boron nitride nanoribbons. In: TENCON 2017—2017 IEEE Region 10 Conference, Penang, Malaysia, 5–8 Nov 2017, pp 2783–2788.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2017.8228335
  33. 33.
    Celik FA, Yildiz AK (2015) Molecular dynamics simulation of crystallization kinetics and homogenous nucleation of Pt-Rh alloy. J Non-Cryst Solids 415:36–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bian X, Wang W (2000) Thermal-rate treatment and structure transformation of Al-13 wt.% Si alloy melt. Mater Lett 44:54–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(00)00011-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Luedtke WD, Landman U (1988) Preparation and melting of amorphous silicon by molecular-dynamics simulations. Phys Rev B 37:4656–4663.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.4656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    George E, Das D, Osterman M, Pecht M (2011) Thermal cycling reliability of lead-free solders (SAC305 and Sn3.5Ag) for high-temperature applications. IEEE Trans Device Mater Reliab 11:328–338.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TDMR.2011.2134100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kehoe L, Crean GM (1998) Thermal conductivity and specific heat determinations of a set of lead-free solder alloys. In: Proc 4th Int Symp on Advanced Packaging Materials Processes, Properties and Interfaces, Braselton, GA, USA, 18 March 1998, pp 203–208Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hünenberger PH (2005) Thermostat algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations. Adv Polym Sci 173:105–149.  https://doi.org/10.1007/b99427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nguyen TT, Yu D, Park SB (2011) Characterizing the mechanical properties of actual SAC105 , SAC305, and SAC405 solder joints by digital image correlation. J Electron Mater 40:1409–1415.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-011-1534-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mojumder S, Al Amin A, Islam MM (2015) Mechanical properties of stanene under uniaxial and biaxial loading: a molecular dynamics study. J Appl Phys 118:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4931572 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Islam MM, Ostadhossein A, Borodin O et al (2015) ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulations on lithiated sulfur cathode materials. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:3383–3393.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP04532G CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Molnár A, Kardos I, Molnár I, Gácsi Z (2014) Effect of silver content on the properties of lead-free solders. Mater Sci Eng 39:51–58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-015-3866-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lall P, Shantaram S, Suhling J, Locker D (2015) Stress–strain behavior of SAC305 at high strain rates. J Electron Packag 137:011010.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringBangladesh University of Engineering and TechnologyDhakaBangladesh
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations