Advertisement

Journal of Molecular Modeling

, 23:361 | Cite as

Learning the deformation mechanism of poly(vinylidine fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene): an insight into strain-induced microstructure evolution via molecular dynamics

  • Linyuan Wang
  • Jie Ma
  • Xudong He
  • Hao Ke
  • Jian Liu
  • Chaoyang Zhang
Original Paper
  • 123 Downloads

Abstract

Learning the micro-mechanisms of fluorinated polymers during mechanical response is more difficult than that of common polymers due to the unique intrinsic characteristics of the fluorine element. In this paper, we applied molecular dynamics simulations to study deformation mechanisms of poly(vinylidine fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene) during uniaxial tension. We analyzed the variations of individual energy components and structural distribution curves versus strain in addition to the commonly used stress-strain curves and microstructure evolutions during stretching. The elastic limit is ɛ = 0.02, ɛ = 0.06 is the yield point, ɛ = 0.24 is the termination of the softening, necking occurs at 0.24 < ɛ < 0.5, strain hardening occurs at 0.5 < ɛ < 2.6, and ɛ = 2.6 is the damage or brake point. The elastic behavior of the material does not rely on strain rate, the obvious effect of strain rate can be seen at the yield region and strain softening region, and the stress values are not influenced by strain rates at the softening and hardening stages. Overall, total potential energy is mainly correlated with non-bonded energy, and the proportion of ΔEcoul overwhelms all the others. The energy components are ordered: ΔEcoul > ΔEvdwl > > ΔEangle > ΔEdihed > ΔEbond. The chain conformation at yield point is almost unchanged compared with the pre-stretching conformation. The chain conformations at the end of strain softening changes more obviously than that at yield point. The molecular chains maintain random coil structure before strain hardening, and switch into a stretch chain conformation gradually during strain hardening. The maximum change in bond angle during the stretching process is F-C-H, the largest change in bond length is the C-Cl bond, and the largest change in dihedral angle is H-C-C-H. The change of non-bonded interaction in the poly(VDF-co-CTFE) system is much larger than the bonding interaction, and the main factor affecting bonding interaction is the change of angles.

Graphical abstract

Poly(vinylidine fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene) during tension

Keywords

Fluorinated polymer Molecular dynamics Microstructure evolution Deformation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are greatly grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11572296) and Science & Technology Inovation Foundation of ICM (KJCX-201403).

References

  1. 1.
    Hickner MA, Ghassemi H, Kim YS, Einsla BR, McGrath JE (2004) Alternative polymer systems for proton exchange membranes(PEMs). Chem Rev 104:4587–4611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li K, Liang SW, Lu YY, Wang Q (2007) Synthesis of telechelic fluoropolymers with well-defined functional end groups for cross-linked networks and nanocomposites. Macromolecules 40:4121–4123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Souzy R, Ameduri B, Boutevin B (2004) Synthesis and (co)polymerization of monofluoro, difluoro, trifluorostyrene and ((trifluorovinyl)oxy) benzene. Prog Polym Sci 29:75–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sousa RE, Kundu M, Gören A, Silva MM, Liu LF, Costa CM, Lanceros-Mendeza S (2015) Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene) (PVDF-CTFE) lithium-ion battery separator membranes prepared by phase inversion. RSC Adv 5:90428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ameduri B, Boutevin B (2004) Well architectured fluoropolymers: synthesis, properties and applications. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Logothetis AL (1989) Chemistry of fluorocarbon elastomers. Prog Polym Sci 14:251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Long Y, Chen J (2017) Theoretical study of the interfacial force-field, thermodynamic property, and heat stress for plastic bonded explosives. J Phys Chem C 121:2778–2788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yan QL, Zeman S, Elbeih A (2012) Recent advances in thermal analysis and stability evaluation of insensitive plastic bonded explosives (PBXs). Thermochim Acta 537:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qiu L, Xiao HM (2009) Molecular dynamics study of binding energies, mechanical properties, and detonation performances of bicycle-HMX-based PBXs. J Hazard Mater 164:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gan YC, Yin J, Jiang XS (2014) Self-wrinkling induced by the photopolymerization and self-assembly of fluorinated polymer at air/liquid interface. J Mater Chem A 2:18574–18582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yao X, Dunn SS, Kim P, Duffy M, Alvarenga J, Aizenberg J (2014) Fluorogel elastomers with tunable transparency, elasticity, shape-memory, and antifouling properties. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:4418–4422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu J, Wong DHC, Byrne JD, Chen K, Bowerman C, DeSimone JM (2013) Future of the particle replication in nonwetting templates (PRINT) technology. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:6580–6589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prakash GKS, Smart MC, Wang QJ, Atti A, Pleynet V, Yang B, McGrath K, Olah GA, Narayanan SR, Chun W, Valdez T, Surampudi S (2004) High efficiency direct methanol fuel cell based on poly(styrenesulfonic) acid (PSSA)-poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) composite membranes. J Fluor Chem 125:1217–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li ZM, Wang YH, Cheng ZY (2006) Electromechanical properties of poly(vinylidene-fluoride-chlorotrifluoroethylene) copolymer. Appl Phys Lett 88:062904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu HS, Cheng ZY, Olson D, Mai T, Zhang QM, Kavamos G (2001) Ferroelectric and electromechanical properties of poly(vinylidenefluoride-trifluoroethylene-chlorotrifluoroethylene) terpolymer. Appl Phys Lett 78:2360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Claude J, Lu YY, Wang Q (2007) Effect of molecular weight on the dielectric breakdown strength of ferroelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride-chlorotrifluoroethylene)s. Appl Phys Lett 91:212904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boschet F, Ameduri B (2014) (co)polymers of chlorotrifluoroethylene: synthesis, properties, and applications. Chem Rev 114:927–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ameduri B (2009) From vinylidene fluoride (VDF) to the applications of VDF-containing polymers and copolymers: recent developments and future trends. Chem Rev 109:6632–6686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vitale A, Bongiovanni R, Ameduri B (2015) Fluorinated oligomers and polymers in photopolymerization. Chem Rev 115:8835–8866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bouvard JL, Francis DK, Tschopp MA, Marin EB, Bammann DJ, Horstemeyer MF (2013) An internal state variable material model for predicting the time, thermomechanical, and stress state dependence of amorphous glassy polymers under large deformation. Int J Plast 42:168–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barrat LJ, Baschnagel J, Lyulin A (2010) Molecular dynamics simulations of glassy polymers. Soft Matter 6:3430–3446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Capaldi FM, Boyce MC, Rutledge GC (2004) Molecular response of a glassy polymer to active deformation. Polymer 45:1391–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pacheco AA, Batra RC (2013) Analysis of structural changes during plastic deformations of amorphous polyethylene. Polymer 54:819–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koo B, Subramanian N, Chattopadhyay A (2016) Molecular dynamics study of brittle fracture in epoxy-based thermoset polymer. Compos Part B 95:433–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roberge M, Prud’homme RE, Brisson J (2004) Molecular modelling of the uniaxial deformation of amorphous polyethylene terephthalate. Polymer 45:1401–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yin CQ, Miranda DF, Zhang SH, Zhang QH, Runt J (2016) Microstructure evolution of poly[tetrafluoroethylene-co-(perfluoropropylvinylether)] films under uniaxial deformation. Polymer 99:480–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Defebvin J, Barrau S, Stoclet G, Rochas C, Lefebvre JM (2016) In situ SAXS/WAXS investigation of the structural evolution of poly(vinylidene fluoride) upon uniaxial stretching. Polymer 84:148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miranda DF, Yin CQ, Zhang SH, Runt J (2016) Fluoropolymer microstructure and dynamics: influence of molecular orientation induced by uniaxial drawing. Polymer 91:211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu J, Zeng Q, Zhang YL, Zhang CY (2016) Limited-sample coarse-grained strategy and its applications to molecular crystals: elastic property prediction and nanoindentation simulations of 1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-triazinane. J Phys Chem C 120:15198–15208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maple JA, Hwang MJ, Stockfisch TP, Dinur U, Waldman M, Ewig CS, Hagler AT (1994) Derivation of class II force fields. I. Methodology and quantum force field for the alkyl functional group and alkane molecules. J Comput Chem 15:162–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hwang MJ, Stockfisch TP, Hagler AT (1994) Derivation of class II force fields. 2. Derivation and characterization of a class II force field, CFF93, for the alkyl functional group and alkane molecules. J Am Chem Soc 116:2515–2525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sun H, Mumby SJ, Maple JR, Hagler AT (1994) An ab initio CFF93 all-atom force field for polycarbonates. J Am Chem Soc 116:2978–2987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sun H (1998) COMPASS: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications-overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. J Phys Chem B 102:7338–7364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baskes MI (1999) Many-body effects in fcc metals: a lennard-Jones embedded-atom potential. Phys Rev Lett 83:2592–2595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sun H (1994) Force field for computation of conformational energies, structures, and vibrational frequencies of aromatic polyesters. J Comput Chem 15:752–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lin TJ, Heinz H (2016) Accurate force field parameters and pH resolved surface models for hydroxyapatite to understand structure, mechanics, hydration, and biological interfaces. J Phys Chem C 120:4975–4992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xiong QL, Meguid SA, Wang Y, Weng GJ (2015) Molecular dynamics and atomistic based continuum studies of the interfacial behavior of nanoreinforced epoxy. Mech Mater 85:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chen XP, Yuan CA, Wong CKY, Koh SW, Zhang GQ (2011) Validation of forcefields in predicting the physical and thermophysical properties of emeraldine base polyaniline. Mol Simul 37:990–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Min SH, Kwak SK, Kim BS (2015) Atomistic simulation for coil-to-globule transition of poly(2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate). Soft Matter 11:2423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li C, Strachan A (2011) Molecular dynamics predictions of thermal and mechanical properties of thermoset polymer EPON862/DETDA. Polymer 52:2920–2928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li C, Jaramillo E, Strachan A (2013) Molecular dynamics simulations on cyclic deformation of an epoxy thermoset. Polymer 54:881–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Valavala P, Odegard G, Aifantis EC (2009) Influence of representative volume element size on predicted elastic properties of polymer materials. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 17:045004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bandyopadhyay A, Valavala PK, Clancy TC (2011) Molecular modeling of crosslinked epoxy polymers: the effect of crosslink density on thermomechanical properties. Polymer 52:2445–2452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nose SA (1984) Molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol Phys 52:255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stukowski A (2010) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the open visualization tool. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:015012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Capaldi FM, Boyce MC, Rutledge GC (2002) Enhanced mobility accompanies the active deformation of a glassy amorphous polymer. Phys Rev Lett 89:175505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Keitel H, Zhao J, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T (2014) Stochastic predictions of bulk properties of amorphous polyethylene based on molecular dynamics simulations. Mech Mater 68:70–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hossain D, Tschopp MA, Ward DK, Bouvard JL, Wang P, Horstemeyer MF (2010) Molecular dynamics simulations of deformation mechanisms of amorphous polyethylene. Polymer 51:6071–6083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Volkenstein MV (1963) Configuration statistics of polymeric chains. Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Institute of Chemical MaterialsChina Academy of Engineering Physics (CAEP)MianyangChina

Personalised recommendations