Assessing the dispersive and electrostatic components of the selenium–aromatic interaction energy by DFT
- 182 Downloads
Selenium has been increasingly recognized as an important element in biological systems, which participates in numerous biochemical processes in organisms, notably in enzyme reactions. Selenium can substitute sulfur of cysteine and methionine to form their selenium analogues, selenocysteine (Sec) and selenomethionine (SeM). The nature of amino acid pockets in proteins is dependent on their composition and thus different non-covalent forces determine the interactions between selenium of Sec or SeM and other functional groups, resulting in specific biophysical behavior. The discrimination of selenium toward sulfur has been reported. In order to elucidate the difference between the nature of S-π and Se-π interactions, we performed extensive DFT calculations of dispersive and electrostatic contributions of Se-π interactions in substituted benzenes/hydrogen selenide (H2Se) complexes. The results are compared with our earlier reported S-π calculations, as well as with available experimental data. Our results show a larger contribution of dispersive interactions in Se-π systems than in S-π ones, which mainly originate from the attraction between Se and substituent groups. We found that selenium exhibits a strong interaction with aromatic systems and may thus play a significant role in stabilizing protein folds and protein–inhibitor complexes. Our findings can also provide molecular insights for understanding enzymatic specificity discrimination between single selenium versus a sulfur atom, notwithstanding their very similar chemical properties.
KeywordsDFT calculations Electrostatic and dispersive interactions calculations Se-aromatic interactions TD-DFT calculations
This work was financially supported by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Contracts No 173001 and 172035, and COST Action CM1405, Molecules in Motion (MOLIM). The authors would like to thank Prof. Ljiljana Došen-Mićović for help with this project, and the anonymous referee for valuable suggestions that improved the clarity of the manuscript. Graphs were rendered in Origin 8, figures were made using Discovery Studio 2016.
- 1.Hatfield DL, Schweizer U, Tsuji PA, Gladyshev VN (2016) Selenium— its molecular biology and role in human health. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 2.Brigelius-Flohe R, Sies H (2016) Diversity of selenium functions in health and disease, oxidative stress and disease, no. 38. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- 7.Waters ML (2004) Aromatic interactions in peptides: impact on structure and function. Biopolymers 76:435–445. doi: 10.1002/bip.20144
- 9.Saberinasab M, Salehzadeh S, Maghsoud Y, Bayat M (2016) The significant effect of electron donating and electron withdrawing substituents on nature and strength of an intermolecular Se∙∙∙∙πinteraction. A theoretical study. Comp Theor Chem 1078:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.comptc.2015.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Caracelli I, Haiduc I, Zukerman-Schpector J, Tiekink ERT (2014) Supramolecular architectures based on M(lone pair)···π(arene) interactions for M=Se and Te. In: Patai S, Rappoport Z (eds) Chemistry of organic selenium and tellurium compounds, 4th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 973–988Google Scholar
- 15.Caracelli I, Haiduc I, Zukerman-Schpector J, Tiekink ERT (2016) A new non-covalent bonding mode in supramolecular chemistry: main group element lone-pair···π(arene) interactions. In: Johnson DW, Hof F (eds) Aromatic interactions: frontiers in knowledge and application, monographs in supramolecular chemistry, no. 20. The Royal Society of Chemistry, UK, pp 89–124Google Scholar
- 27.Mander L, Liu HW (2010) Comprehensive natural products II: chemistry and biology, vol. 1. Newnes, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 31.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery Jr JA, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas O, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2009) Gaussian 09, revision E.01. Gaussian Inc., WallingfordGoogle Scholar
- 35.Dunning Jr TH, Hay PJ (1977) Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations. In: Schaefer HF (ed) Modern theoretical chemistry, vol 3. Plenum, New York, pp 1–28Google Scholar
- 39.PARADOX cluster at the Scientific Computing Laboratory of the Institute of Physics Belgrade, supported in part by the Serbian Ministry of Education and Science under project No. ON171017, and by the European Commission under FP7 projects HP-SEE, PRACE-1IP, PRACE-2IP, EGI-InSPIREGoogle Scholar