Advertisement

Investigation of the encapsulation of metal cations (Cu2+, Zn2+, Ca2+ and Ba2+) by the dipeptide Phe–Phe using natural bond orbital theory and molecular dynamics simulation

  • Snehasis Bhunia
  • Ajeet Singh
  • Animesh K. OjhaEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Complexes of the dipeptide phenylalanine–phenylalanine (Phe–Phe) with divalent metal cations (Cu2+, Zn2+, Ca2+ and Ba2+) were studied at the B3LYP and MP2 levels of theory with the basis sets 6-311++G(d,p) and 6-31 + G(d) in the gas phase. The relative energies of these complexes indicated that cation–π bidentate/tridentate conformations are more favourable than other conformations with uncoordinated rings. These findings were confirmed by the calculated values of thermodynamic parameters such as the Gibbs free energy. Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis was carried out to explore the metal–ligand coordination in Phe–Phe–Cu2+/Zn2+ complexes. Possible orbital transitions, types of orbitals and their occupancies were determined for a range of Phe–Phe–Cu2+/Zn2+ complexes. The charge transfer involved in various orbital transitions was explored by considering the second-order perturbation energy. NBO analysis revealed that the change transfer is stronger when the metal cation uses both the 4s + 4p subshells rather than just its 4p subshell. We also performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to check the stability and consistency of the most favourable binding motifs of Cu2+, Zn2+, Ca2+ and Ba2+ with Phe–Phe over time. The structures of the Phe–Phe–Cu2+/Zn2+/Ca2+/Ba2+ complexes obtained using MD simulation were found to be in good agreement with those obtained in the DFT-based calculations.

Graphical Abstract

Conformational search on encapsulation of divalent metal cations (Ca2+, Zn2+, Ca2+, Ba2+) by the Phe-Phe dipeptide

Keywords

Dipeptide Phe–Phe DFT MD NBO 

Notes

Acknowledgements

SB and AKO are grateful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for providing financial support through project grant number no. 03(1179)/10/EMR-II. AS thanks DST, New Delhi (fast track: SB/FT/CS-127/2014) for financial support.

Supplementary material

894_2017_3248_MOESM1_ESM.doc (460 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 459 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Prasad AS (1995) Zinc: an overview. Nutrition 11:93Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sorenson JRJ (1995) In: Berthon G (ed) Handbook on metal–ligand interactions in biological fluids. Bioinorganic medicine, vol 2. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1128–1139Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huq F (2001) Molecular modeling analysis of the ease in oxidation of planar nickel–peptide complexes. J Mol Model 7:433–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Okur HI, Kherb J, Cremer PS (2013) Hofmeister ion interactions with model amide compounds. J Am Chem Soc 135:5062–5067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao YQ (2012) Simple theory for salt effects on the solubility of amide. J Phys Chem B 116:9934–9943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baldauf C, Pagel K, Warnke S, Helden GV, Koksch B, Blum V, Scheffler M (2013) How cations change peptide structure. Chem Eur J 19:11224–11234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jungwirth P, Cremer PS (2014) Beyond Hofmeister. Nat Chem 6:261–263Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhunia S, Hassanein R, Materny A, Ojha AK (2015) ​Raman fingerprint of the interaction of K+ with the COO− group of zwitterionic alanine. ​Journal of Raman Spectroscopy ​46:1191–1199 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim H, Lee H, Lee G, Kim H, Cho M (2012) Hofmeister anionic effects on hydration electric fields around water and peptide. J Chem Phys 136:124501–124510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dunbar RC, Oomens J, Berden G, Lau JKC, Verkerk UH, Hopkinson AC, Siu KWM (2013) Metal ion complexes with HisGly: comparison with PhePhe and PheGly. J Phys Chem A117:5335–5343Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dunbar RC, Steill JD, Oomens J (2011) Encapsulation of metal cations by the PhePhe ligand: a cation–π ion cage. J Am Chem Soc 133:9376–9386Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jellinger KA (2013) The relevance of metals in the pathophysiology of neurodegeneration, pathological considerations. Int Rev Neurobiol 110:1–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ward RJ, Dexter DT, Crichton RR (2012) Chelating agents for neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Med Chem 19:2760–2772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stelmashook EV, Isaev NK, Genrikhs EE, Amelkina GA, Khaspekov LG, Skrebitsky VG (2014) Role of zinc and copper ions in the pathogenetic mechanisms of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Biochem 79:391–396Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cherny RA, Atwood CS, Xilinas ME, Gray DN, Jones WD, McLean CA, Barnham KJ, Volitakis FW, Fraser Y, Kim X, Huang LE, Goldstein RD, Moir JT, Lim K, Beyreuther I, Zheng H, Tanzi RE, Masters CL, Bush AI (2001) Treatment with a copper–zinc chelator markedly and rapidly inhibits beta-amyloid accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice. Neuron 30:665–676Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gaggelli E, Kozlowski H, Valensin D, Valensin G (2006) Copper homeostasis and neurodegenerative disorders (Alzheimer’s, prion, and Parkinson’s diseases and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). Chem Rev 106:1995–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jankowska TK, Ruta M, Wisniewska K, Lankiewicz LJ (2003) Coordination abilities of the 1–16 and 1–28 fragments of beta-amyloid peptide towards copper(II) ions: a combined potentiometric and spectroscopic study. Inorg Biochem 95:270–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gokel GW, Barbour LJ, Ferdani RHJ (2002) Lariat ether receptor systems show experimental evidence for alkali metal cation–pi interactions. J Account Chem Res 35:878–886Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gokel GW, Barbour LJ, De Wall SL, Meadows ES (2001) Macrocyclic polyethers as probes to assess and understand alkali metal cation–pi interactions. Chem Rev 222:127–154Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gokel GW, Barbour LJ, Ferdani R, Hu J (2002) Lariat ether receptor systems show experimental evidence for alkali metal cation–pi interactions. Acc Chem Res 35:878–886Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ruan CH, Rodgers MT (2004) Cation–π interactions: structures and energetics of complexation of Na+ and K+ with the aromatic amino acids, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan. J Am Chem Soc 126:14600–14610Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ryzhov V, Dunbar RC, Cerda B, Wesdemiotis C (2000) Cation–π effects in the complexation of Na+ and K+ with Phe, Tyr, and Trp in the gas phase. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 11:1037–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dunbar RC, Steill JD, Oomens J (2010) Cationized phenylalanine conformations characterized by IRMPD and computation for singly and doubly charged ions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:13383–13393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dunbar RC, Steill JD, Polfer NC, Oomens J (2009) Dimeric complexes of tryptophan with M2+ metal ions. J Phys Chem A113:845–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Polfer NC, Oomens J, Moore DT, Helden GV, Meijer G, Dunbar RC (2006) Infrared spectroscopy of phenylalanine Ag(I) and Zn(II) complexes in the gas phase. J Am Chem Soc 128:517–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Polfer NC, Oomens J, Dunbar RC (2008) Alkali metal complexes of the dipeptides PheAla and AlaPhe: IRMPD spectroscopy. Chem Phys Chem 9:579–589Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dunbar RC, Steill JD, Oomens J (2010) Conformations and vibrational spectroscopy of metal-ion/polylalanine complexes. Int J Mass Spectrom 297:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stearns JA, Guidi M, Boyarkin OV, Rizzo TR (2007) Conformation-specific infrared and ultraviolet spectroscopy of tyrosine-based protonated dipeptides. J Chem Phys 127:154322–154328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Benzakour M, McHarfi M, Cartier A, Daoudi A (2004) Interactions of peptides with metallic cations. I. Complexes glycylglycine–M+ (M=Li, Na) J. Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 710:169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Prell JS, Flick TG, Oomens J, Berden G, Williams ER (2010) Coordination of trivalent metal cations to peptides: results from IRMPD spectroscopy and theory. J Phys Chem A 114:854–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kapota C, Ohanessian G (2005) The low energy tautomers and conformers of the dipeptides HisGly and GlyHis and of their sodium ion complexes in the gas phase. Phys Chem Chem Phys 7:3744–3755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dunbar RC, Steill JD, Polfer NC, Berden G, Oomens J (2012) Peptide bond tautomerization induced by divalent metal ions: characterization of the iminol configuration. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:4591–4593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Becke AD (1988) Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys Rev B Condens Matter A38:3098–3010Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Becke AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry 3. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Montgomery JA Jr, Vreven T, Kudin KN, Burant JC, Millam JM, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Barone V, Mennucci B, Cossi M, Scalmani G, Rega N, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Klene M, Li X, Knox JE, Hratchian HP, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Ayala PY, Morokuma K, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Zakrzewski VG, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Strain MC, Farkas O, Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cui Q, Baboul AG, Clifford S, Cioslowski J, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Gonzalez C, Pople JA (2004) Gaussian 03, revision D.01. Gaussian Inc., WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lendvay GL (1989) Bond orders from ab initio calculations and a test of the principle of bond order conservation. J Phys Chem 93:4422–4429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reed AE, Curtiss LA, Weinhold F (1988) Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor–acceptor viewpoint. Chem Rev 88:899–926Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chocholousova J, Spirko VV, Hobza P (2004) First local minimum of the formic acid dimer exhibits simultaneously red-shifted O–H⋯O and improper blue-shifted C–H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Phys Chem Chem Phys 6:37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Accelrys (2009) Discovery Studio Client v3.5. Accelrys, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Halgren TA (1996) Merck Molecular Force Field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94. J Comput Chem 17:490–519Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tsuzuli S, Yoshia M, Uchimaru T, Mikami M (2001) The origin of the cation/π interaction: the significant Importance of the induction in Li+ and Na+ complexes. J Phys Chem A105:769–773Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ardakani RB, Ardakani FP, Taghdiri M, Kotena ZM (2016) DFT-B3LYP study of interactions between host biphenyl-1-aza-18-crown-6 ether derivatives and guest Cd2+: NBO, NEDA, and QTAIM analyses. J Mol Model 22:149–159Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Snehasis Bhunia
    • 1
  • Ajeet Singh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Animesh K. Ojha
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsMotilal Nehru National Institute of Technology AllahabadAllahabadIndia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of AllahabadAllahabadIndia

Personalised recommendations