Computer-simulation-based selection of optimal monomer for imprinting of tri-O-acetyl adenosine in a polymer matrix: calculations for benzene solution

  • Ya. V. Douhaya
  • V. V. BarkalineEmail author
  • A. Tsakalof
Original Paper


Molecular imprinting is a promising way to create polymer materials that can be used as artificial receptors, and have anticipated use in synthetic imitation of natural antibodies. In case of successful imprinting, the selectivity and affinity of the imprint for the substrate molecules are comparable with those of natural counterparts. Various calculation methods can be used to estimate the effects of a large range of imprinting parameters under different conditions, and to find better ways to improve polymer characteristics. However, one difficulty is that properties such as hydrogen bonding can be modeled only by quantum methods that demand a lot of computational resources. Combined quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods allow the use of MM and QM for different parts of the modeled system. In present study this method was realized in the NWChem package to compare estimations of the stability of tri-O-acetyl adenosine–monomer pre-polymerization complexes in benzene solution with previous results under vacuum.


Molecularly imprinted polymer Pre-polymerization complex Self-consistent field Benzene solution Molecular mechanics QM/MM method NWChem package 



The work was supported by Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research, Grant Ф15ЛИT-004. The authors thanks Dr. Helena Tamuliene for fruitful discussions on the peculiarities of quantum calculations.


  1. 1.
    Lakka A, Tsakalof A (2013) Molecular imprinting of Tri-O-acetyladenosine for the synthetic imitation of an ATP-binding cleft in protein kinases. Chempluschem 78(8):808–815. doi: 10.1002/cplu.201300101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barkaline V, Douhaya Y, Tsakalof A (2013) Computer simulation based selection of optimal monomer for imprinting of tri-O-acetiladenosine in polymer matrix: vacuum calculations. J Mol Model 19:359–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Valiev M, Bylaska EJ, Govind N, Kowalski K, Straatsma TP, van Dam HJJ et al (2010) NWChem: a comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations. Comput Phys Commun 181:1477–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hobza P, Mueller-Dethlefs K (2010) Non-covalent interactions: theory and experiment. Royal Society of Chemistry Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lakka A., Tsakalof A (2010) Fabrication and characterization of tri-O-acetyladenosine imprinted polymers for screening and isolation of protein kinase inhibitors (2010) biomaterials and bionanomaterials. Heraklion, Crete, Greece: Biomaterials and bionanomaterials p 68Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lattach Y, Archirel P, Remita S (2012) Influence of the chemical functionalities of a molecularly imprinted conducting polymer on its sensing properties: electromechanical measurement and semiempirical DFT calculations. J Phys Chem B 116:1467–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu B, Wong CF (2005) Direct estimation of entropy loss due to reduced translational and rotational motions upon molecular binding. Biopolymers 79:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang CA, Chen W, Gilson MK (2007) Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1534–1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ya. V. Douhaya
    • 1
  • V. V. Barkaline
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Tsakalof
    • 2
  1. 1.Belarusian National Technical UniversityMinskBelarus
  2. 2.School of MedicineUniversity of ThessalyLarisaGreece

Personalised recommendations