Towards predictive docking at aminergic G-protein coupled receptors
- 417 Downloads
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are hard to crystallize. However, attempts to predict their structure have boomed as a result of advancements in crystallographic techniques. This trend has allowed computer-aided molecular modeling of GPCRs. We analyzed the performance of four molecular modeling programs in pose evaluation of re-docked antagonists / inverse agonists to 11 original crystal structures of aminergic GPCRs using an induced fit-docking procedure. AutoDock and Glide were used for docking. AutoDock binding energy function, GlideXP, Prime MM-GB/SA, and YASARA binding function were used for pose scoring. Root mean square deviation (RMSD) of the best pose ranged from 0.09 to 1.58 Å, and median RMSD of the top 60 poses ranged from 1.47 to 3.83 Å. However, RMSD of the top pose ranged from 0.13 to 7.33 Å and ranking of the best pose ranged from the 1st to 60th out of 60 poses. Moreover, analysis of ligand–receptor interactions of top poses revealed substantial differences from interactions found in crystallographic structures. Bad ranking of top poses and discrepancies between top docked poses and crystal structures render current simple docking methods unsuitable for predictive modeling of receptor–ligand interactions. Prime MM-GB/SA optimized for 3NY9 by multiple linear regression did not work well at 3NY8 and 3NYA, structures of the same receptor with different ligands. However, 9 of 11 trajectories of molecular dynamics simulations by Desmond of top poses converged with trajectories of crystal structures. Key interactions were properly detected for all structures. This procedure also worked well for cross-docking of tested β2-adrenergic antagonists. Thus, this procedure represents a possible way to predict interactions of antagonists with aminergic GPCRs.
KeywordsInduced-fit docking Pose scoring Molecular dynamics Ligand-receptor interaction
This work was supported by the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic project [AV0Z 50110509] and support [RVO:67985823], the Czech Science Foundation grants [305/09/0681], [P304/12/G069] and [14-05696S]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
- 3.Ellis J, Seidenberg M, Brann MR (1993) Use of chimeric muscarinic receptors to investigate epitopes involved in allosteric interactions. Mol Pharmacol 44:583–588Google Scholar
- 4.Fraser CM, Wang CD, Robinson DA, Gocayne JD, Venter JC (1989) Site-directed mutagenesis of m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: conserved aspartic acids play important roles in receptor function. Mol Pharmacol 36:840–847Google Scholar
- 8.Yang J, Zhang Y (2015) GPCRS-EXP: a database for experimentally solved GPCR structures. http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/GPCR-EXP/
- 28.Prime (2013) Schrödinger, LLC, New York. http://www.schrodinger.com
- 31.Yuriev E, Holien J, Ramsland PA (2015) Improvements, trends, and new ideas in molecular docking: 2012–2013 in review. J Mol Recognit 28:581–604. doi: 10.1002/jmr.2471
- 38.Maestro (2013) Schrödinger, LLC, New York. http://www.schrodinger.com
- 40.LigPrep (2013) Schrödinger, LLC, New York. http://www.schrodinger.com.
- 41.R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2014) R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
- 42.Bowers KJ, Chow E, Xu H, Dror RO, Eastwood MP et al (2006) Scalable algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations on commodity clusters. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC06). ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 43.Grace Development Team Grace: A plotting tool (2014) Grace Development Team, http://hplasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Grace/
- 44.Segura-Cabrera A, García-Pérez C, Ciprés-Flores F, Cuevas-Hernández R, Trujillo-Ferrara J, Correa-Basurto J, Soriano-Ursúa M (2014) Molecular dynamics simulations to explore the active/inactive conformers of guinea pig β2 adrenoceptor for the selective design of agonists or antagonists. Mol Simul 40:1244–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.The binding database: a public database of measured binding affinities (2014) Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, La Jolla. http://www.bindingdb.org
- 56.Jakubik J, Bacakova L, el-Fakahany EE, Tucek S (1995) Subtype selectivity of the positive allosteric action of alcuronium at cloned M1-M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 274:1077–1083Google Scholar
- 57.Ballesteros J, Weinstein H (1995) In: Sealfon S, Conn P (Eds) Methods in neurosciences. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar