Journal of Molecular Modeling

, Volume 19, Issue 11, pp 4723–4730 | Cite as

Effect of the aminoacid composition of model α-helical peptides on the physical properties of lipid bilayers and peptide conformation: a molecular dynamics simulation

  • Milan Melicherčík
  • Alžbeta Holúbeková
  • Tibor Hianik
  • Ján Urban
Original Paper

Abstract

The interaction of a model Lys flanked α-helical peptides K2-X24-K2, (X = A,I,L,L+A,V) with lipid bilayers composed of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) both, in a gel and in a liquid-crystalline state, has been studied by molecular dynamics simulations. It has been shown that these peptides cause disordering of the lipid bilayer in the gel state but only small changes have been monitored in a liquid-crystalline state. The peptides affect ordering of the surrounding lipids depending on the helix stability which is determined by amino acid side chains – their volume, shape, etc. We have shown that the helix does not keep the linear shape in all simulations but often bends or breaks. During some simulations with a very small difference between hydrophobic length of peptide and membrane thickness the peptide exhibits negligible tilt. At the same time changes in peptide conformations during simulations resulted in appearance of superhelix.

Keywords

Bilayer lipid membranes Helical peptides Molecular dynamics simulations Phase transitions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This publication is the result of the project implementation: “The development of the center of excellence for utilization of information on bio-macromolecules in disease prevention and in improvement of quality of life” (ITMS 26240120027) supported by the Research and Development Operational Programme funded by the European Regional Development Fund. The access to the METACentrum computing facilities provided under the research intent MSM6383917201 is highly appreciated. This work was also supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (Project No. APVV – 0410-10 and LPP-0341-09).

References

  1. 1.
    Bordag N, Keller S (2010) Alpha-helical transmembrane peptides: a “divide and conquer” approach to membrane proteins. Chem Phys Lipids 163:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khandelia H, Ipsen JH, Mouritsen OG (2008) The impact of peptides on lipid membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1778:1528–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Planque MRR, Killian JA (2003) Protein-lipid interactions studied with designed transmembrane peptides: role of hydrophobic matching and interfacial anchoring. Mol Membr Biol 20:271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang Y-P, Lewis RNAH, Hodges RS, McElhaney RN (1992) Interaction of a peptide model of a hydrophobic transmembrane α-helical segment of a membrane protein with phosphatidylcholine bilayers: differential scanning calorimetric and FTIR spectroscopic studies. Biochemistry 31:11579–11588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paré C, Lafleur M, Liu F, Lewis RNAH, McElhaney RN (2001) Differential scanning calorimetry and 2H-nuclear magnetic resonance and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy studies of the effects of transmembrane α-helical peptides on the organization of phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1511:60–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Planque MRR, Greathous DV, Koeppe RE II, Schäfer H, Marsh D, Killian JA (1998) Influence of lipid/peptide hydrophobic mismatch on the thickness of diacylphosphatidylcholine bilayers. A 2H NMR and ESR study using designed transmembrane alpha-helical peptides and gramicidin A. Biochemistry 37:9333–9345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rybar P, Krivanek R, Samuely T, Lewis RNAH, McElhaney RN, Hianik T (2007) Study of the interaction of an α-helical transmembrane peptide with phosphatidylcholine bilayer membranes by means of densimetry and ultrasound velocimetry. Biochim Biophys Acta 1768:1466–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lewis RNAH, Liu F, Krivanek R, Rybar P, Flach CR, Mendelsohn R, Chen Y, Mant CT, Hodges RS, McElhaney RN (2007) Studies of the minimum hydrophobicity of α-helical peptides required to maintain a stable transmembrane association with phospholipid bilayer membranes. Biochemistry 46:1042–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feller S (2001) Molecular dynamics simulation of phospholipid bilayers. In: Katsaras J, Gutgerlet T (eds) Lipid bilayers. Structure and interactions. Springer, Berlin, pp 89–107Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petrache HI, Zuckerman DM, Sachs JN, Killian JA, Koeppe REH II, Woolf TB (2002) Hydrophobic matching mechanism investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. Langmuir 18:1340–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tieleman PD, Forest LR, Samsom MSP, Berendsen HJC (1998) Lipid properties and the orientation of aromatic residues in OmpF, influenza M2, and alamethicin systems: molecular dynamics simulations. Biochemistry 37:17554–17561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li L (2000) Relating helix tilt in a bilayer to lipid disorder: a mean-field theory. Biophys Chem 86:79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weiss TM, van der Wer PCA, Killian JA, Koeppe RE II, Huang HW (2003) Hydrophobic mismatch between helices and lipid bilayers. Biophys J 84:379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harzer U, Bechinger B (2000) Alignment of lysine-anchored membrane peptides under conditions of hydrophobic mismatch: a CD, 15N and 31P solid-state NMR spectroscopy investigation. Biochemistry 39:13106–13114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D (2001) GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 7:306–317Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJC (1987) Gromos-87 manual. Biomos BV, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands, pp 331–342Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Buuren AR, Marrink SJ, Berendsen HJC (1993) A molecular dynamics study of the decane/water interface. J Phys Chem 97:9206–9212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mark AE, van Helden SP, Smith PE, Janssen LHM, van Gunsteren WF (1994) Convergence properties of free energy calculations: α-cyclodextrin complexes as a case study. J Am Chem Soc 116:6293–6302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hypercube, Inc (2007) HyperChem(TM) Professional 7.51, Hypercube, Inc., 1115 NW 4th Street, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tieleman DP, Marrink SJ, Berendsen HJC (1997) A computer perspective of membranes: molecular dynamics studies of lipid bilayer systems. Biochim Biophys Acta 1331:235–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nagle JF, Tristram-Nagle S (2000) Structure of lipid bilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1469:159–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Berger O, Edholm O, Jahnnig F (1997) Molecular dynamics simulations of a fluid bilayer of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine at full hydration, constant pressure, and constant temperature. Biophys J 72:2002–2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pace CN, Scholtz JM (1998) A helix propensity scale based on experimental studies of peptides and proteins. Biophys J 75:422–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Killian JA (2003) Synthetic peptides as models for intrinsic membrane proteins. FEBS Lett 555:134–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sargent DF (1975) Voltage jump/capacitance relaxation studies of bilayer structure and dynamics studies on oxidized cholesterol membranes. J Membr Biol 23:227–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hianik T, Krivánek R, Sargent DF, Sokolíková L, Vinceová K (1996) A study of the interaction of adrenocorticotropin-(1-24)-tetracosapeptide with BLM and liposomes. Progr Colloid Polym Sci 100:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milan Melicherčík
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alžbeta Holúbeková
    • 1
  • Tibor Hianik
    • 1
  • Ján Urban
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Nuclear Physics and BiophysicsComenius UniversityBratislavaSlovak Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Nanobiology and Structural Biology of GCRCAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicNové HradyCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations