Why are dimethyl sulfoxide and dimethyl sulfone such good solvents?
- 1.2k Downloads
We have carried out B3PW91 and MP2-FC computational studies of dimethyl sulfoxide, (CH3)2SO, and dimethyl sulfone, (CH3)2SO2. The objective was to establish quantitatively the basis for their high polarities and boiling points, and their strong solvent powers for a variety of solutes. Natural bond order analyses show that the sulfur–oxygen linkages are not double bonds, as widely believed, but rather are coordinate covalent single S+→O− bonds. The calculated electrostatic potentials on the molecular surfaces reveal several strongly positive and negative sites (the former including σ-holes on the sulfurs) through which a variety of simultaneous intermolecular electrostatic interactions can occur. A series of examples is given. In terms of these features the striking properties of dimethyl sulfoxide and dimethyl sulfone, their large dipole moments and dielectric constants, their high boiling points and why they are such good solvents, can readily be understood.
KeywordsDimethyl sulfoxide Dimethyl sulfone Electrostatic potentials σ-Hole bonding Noncovalent interactions
This work was supported in part by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft as part of SFB583 Redox-active Metal Complexes: Control of Reactivity via Molecular Architecture.
- 1.Lide DR (ed) (2006) Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 87th edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
- 2.Gaylord Chemical Corp., Research and Technology Center, Bogalusa, LAGoogle Scholar
- 3.Johnson III RD (ed) (2005) NIST Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database, NIST Standard Reference Database No. 101, Release 12, http://srdata.nist.gov/cccbdb
- 4.Windholz M (ed) (1983) The Merck Index, 10th edn, Merck, Rahway, NJGoogle Scholar
- 6.Politzer P, Truhlar DG (eds) (1981) Chemical Applications of Atomic and Molecular Electrostatic Potentials. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 10.Politzer P, Murray JS (1999) Trends Chem Phys 7:157–165Google Scholar
- 13.Arndt F, Eistert B (1941) Ber Dtsch Chem Ges 74:451–459Google Scholar
- 14.Phillips GM, Hunter JS, Sutton LE (1945) J Chem Soc 146–162Google Scholar
- 16.Cruickshank DW (1961) J Chem Soc 5486–5504Google Scholar