Journal of Molecular Modeling

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 217–224 | Cite as

Construction of a toroidal model for the magainin pore

Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Magainins are natural peptides that selectively kill bacteria at concentrations that are harmless to animal cells. Due to a positive charge and distinct hydrophobic moment, magainins in the α-helical conformation interact favorably with bacterial membrane lipids. These interactions lead to the formation of large openings in the membrane and to the cell's death. The openings (toroidal pores) are supramolecular structures consisting of lipid and peptide molecules. A computer model of the pore in a bacterial membrane was constructed (see Figure) for the study of the molecular basis for magainin selectivity and specificity. Details of the construction and the preliminary equilibration of the pore model are given in this paper.

Figure Stages of PORE construction. a A side view and b the top view of E6 cluster (see text for details). The coloring scheme of lipid molecules is described in the caption to Fig. 5. c The top view of the magainin pore built of five M2a molecules (in purple and gold), five EG4E clusters, and five E6 clusters. d The top view of the lamellar part of PORE. The size of the hole in the bilayer center matches the size of the supramolecular complex shown in c. e The pore (c) is now placed in the central part of the bilayer (d)

Keywords

Antibacterial peptide Magainin Toroidal pore Phosphatidylglycerol Phosphatidylethanolamine Lipid membrane 

Abbreviations

M2a

magainin-2 amide

POPE

1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-phosphatidylethanoloamine

POPG

1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-phosphatidylglycerol

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants 6 P04A 041 16, 6 P04A 031 21 and KBN/SGI ORIGIN 2000/UJ/048/1999 from the State Committee for Scientific Research and by European Union (contract no. BIER ICA1-CT-2000-70012). KM holds a fellowship award from the Polish Foundation for Science.

References

  1. 1.
    Zasloff M (1987) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:5449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gesell J, Zasloff M, Opella SJ (1997) J Biomol NMR 9:127–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matsuzaki K, Sugishita K, Fujii N, Miyajima M (1995) Biochemistry 34:3423–3429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matsuzaki K (1999) Biochim Biophys Acta 1462:1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tytler EM, Anantharamaiah GM, Walker DE, Mishra VK, Palgunachari MN, Segrest JP (1995) Biochemistry 34:4393–4401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wieprecht T, Dathe M, Epand RM, Beyermann M., Krause E, Maloy WL, MacDonald DL, Bienert M (1997) Biochemistry 36:12869–12880CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maloy WL, Kari UP (1995) Biopolymers 37:105–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ludtke SJ, He K, Heller WT, Harroun TA, Yang L, Huang HW (1996) Biochemistry 35:13723–13728PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsuzaki K, Murase O, Fujii N, Miyajima M (1996) Biochemistry 35:11361–11368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herrmann A, Zachowski A, Devaux PF (1990) Biochemistry 29:2023–2027Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mollay C, Kreil G, Berger H (1976) Biochim Biophys Acta 426:317–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singer SJ, Nicolson GL (1972) Science 175:720–731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cullis PR, de Kruijff B (1978) Biochim Biophys Acta 513:31–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Kruijff B (1997) Curr Opin Chem Biol 1:564–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pasenkiewicz-Gierula M, Takaoka Y, Miyagawa H, Kitamura K, Kusumi A (1997) J Phys Chem 101:3677–3691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murzyn K, Pasenkiewicz-Gierula M (1999) Acta Biochim Pol 46:631–639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cascales JJL, delaTorre JG, Marrink SJ, Berendsen HJC (1996) J Chem Phys 104:2713–2720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lins RD, Straatsma TP (2001) Biophys J 81:1037–1046PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ludtke SJ, He K, Wu Y, Huang H (1994) Biochim Biophys Acta 1190:181–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Case DA, Pearlman DA, Caldwell JW, Cheatham III TE, Ross WS, Simmerling CL, Darden TA, Merz KM, Stanton RV, Cheng AL, Vincent JJ, Crowley M, Ferguson DM, Radmer RJ, Seibel GL, Singh UC, Weiner PK and Kollman PA (1997) AMBER 5. University of California, San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Insight II User Guide (1995) Biosym/MSI, San Diego, Calif.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Biopolymers 22:2577–2637PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sayle R, Milner-White EJ (1995) Trends Biochem Sci 20:374–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kraulis PJ (1991) J Appl Crystallogr 24:946–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Merritt EA, Bacon DJ (1997) Methods Enzymol 277:505–524Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jorgensen WL, Madura JD, Swenson CJ (1984) J Am Chem Soc 106:6638–6646Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jorgensen WL, Swenson CJ (1985) J Am Chem Soc 107:569–578Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pasenkiewicz-Gierula M, Takaoka Y, Miyagawa H, Kitamura K, Kusumi A (1999) Biophys J 76:1228–1240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Murzyn K, Róg T, Jezierski G, Takaoka Y, Pasenkiewicz-Gierula M (2001) Biophys J 81:170–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aqvist J (1990) J Phys Chem 94:8021–8024Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) J Chem Phys 79:926–935Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hinsen K (2000) J Comput Chem 21:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sundaralingam M (1972) Ann NY Acad Sci USA 195:324–355Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Molecular Biology and BiotechnologyJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations