Segmental analysis of molecular surface electrostatic potentials: application to enzyme inhibition
Abstract
We have recently shown that the anti-HIV activities of reverse transcriptase inhibitors can be related quantitatively to properties of the electrostatic potentials on their molecular surfaces. We now introduce the technique of using only segments of the drug molecules in developing such expressions. If an improved correlation is obtained for a given family of compounds, it would suggest that the segment being used plays a key role in the interaction. We demonstrate the procedure for three groups of drugs, two acting on reverse transcriptase and one on HIV protease. Segmental analysis is found to be definitely beneficial in one case, less markedly so in another, and to have a negative effect in the third. The last result indicates that major portions of the molecular surfaces are involved in the interactions and that the entire molecules need to be considered, in contrast to the first two examples, in which certain segments appear to be of primary importance. This initial exploratory study shows that segmental analysis can provide insight into the nature of the process being investigated, as well as possibly enhancing the predictive capability.
Keywords
Molecular surface electrostatic potentials Segmental analysis Enzyme inhibitionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Scrocco E, Tomasi J (1973) Top Curr Chem 42:95Google Scholar
- 2.Scrocco E, Tomasi J (1978) Adv Quantum Chem 11:115–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Politzer P, Daiker KC (1981) In: Deb BM (ed) The force concept in chemistry. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, chapter 6Google Scholar
- 4.Politzer P, Truhlar DG (eds) (1981) Chemical applications of atomic and molecular electrostatic potentials. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 5.Politzer P, Laurence PR, Jayasuriya K (1985) Env Health Persp 61:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Politzer P, Murray JS (1991) In: Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB (eds) Reviews in computational chemistry, vol 2. VCH, New York, chapter 7Google Scholar
- 7.Naray-Szabo G, Ferenczy GG (1995) Chem Rev 95:829–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Murray JS, Sen K (eds) (1996) Molecular electrostatic potentials: concepts and applications. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 9.Murray JS, Politzer P (1998) In: Sapse A-M (ed) Molecular orbital calculations for biological systems. Oxford University Press, New York, chapter 3Google Scholar
- 10.Murray JS, Politzer P (2002) In: Carloni P, Alber F (eds) Medicinal quantum chemistry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, in pressGoogle Scholar
- 11.Brinck T, Murray JS, Politzer P (1993) Int J Quantum Chem 48:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Murray JS, Politzer P (1998) In: Parkanyi C (ed) Theoretical organic chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, ch 7Google Scholar
- 13.Politzer P, Murray JS, Concha MC (2002) Int J Quantum Chem 88:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Du Q, Arteca GA (1996) J Comput Chem 17:1258–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Brickmann J, Exner T, Keil M, Marhofer R, Moeckel G (1998) In: Schleyer PvR (ed) Encyclopedia of computational chemistry, vol 3. Wiley, New York, p 1678Google Scholar
- 16.Connolly ML (1998) In: Schleyer PvR (ed) Encyclopedia of computational chemistry, vol 3. Wiley, New York, p 1698Google Scholar
- 17.Bader RFW, Carroll MT, Cheeseman JR, Chang C (1987) J Am Chem Soc 109:7968–7979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Murray JS, Politzer P (1992) J Chem Res, Synop 110–111Google Scholar
- 19.Taft RW, Murray JS (1994) In: Politzer P, Murray JS (eds) Quantitative treatments of solute/solvent interactions. Elsevier, Amsterdam, chapter 3Google Scholar
- 20.Hagelin H, Murray JS, Brinck T, Berthelot M, Politzer P (1995) Can J Chem 73:483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Murray JS, Politzer P (1994) In: Murray JS, Politzer P (eds) Quantitative treatments of solute/solvent interactions. Elsevier, Amsterdam, chapter 8Google Scholar
- 22.Murray JS, Brinck T, Lane P, Paulsen K, Politzer P (1994) J Mol Struct (Theochem) 307:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Murray JS, Politzer P (1998) J Mol Struct (Theochem) 425:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Politzer P, Murray JS (1999) Trends Chem Phys 7:157–168Google Scholar
- 25.Politzer P, Murray JS (2001) Fluid Phase Equil 185:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.SAS, SAS Institute, Cary, NC 27511, USAGoogle Scholar
- 27.Fauci AS (1988) Science 239:617–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Garg R, Gupta SP, Gao H, Babu MS, Debnath AK, Hansch C (1999) Chem Rev 99:3525–3601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Kohl NE, Emini EA, Schleif WA, Davis LJ, Heimbach JC, Dixon RAF, Skolnick EM, Sigal IS (1988) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4686–4690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Peng C, Ho BK, Chang TW, Chang NT (1989) J Virol 63:2550–2556Google Scholar
- 31.Gonzalez OG, Murray JS, Peralta-Inga Z, Politzer P (2001) Int J Quantum Chem 83:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Politzer P, Murray JS, Peralta-Inga Z (2001) Int J Quantum Chem 85:676–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Murray JS, Brinck T, Grice ME, Politzer P (1992) J Mol Struct (Theochem) 256:29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Zakrzewski VG, Montgomery JA, Stratman RE, Burant JC, Dapprich S, Millam JM, Daniels AD, Kudin KN, Strain MC, Farkas O, Tomasi J, Barone V, Cossi M, Cammi R, Mennucci B, Pomelli C, Adamo C, Clifford S, Ochterski J, Petersson GA, Ayala PY, Cui Q, Morokuma K, Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Cioslowski J, Ortiz JV, Baboul AG, Stefanov BB, Liu C, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi, I, Gomperts R, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Gonzalez C, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson BG, Chen W, Wong MW, Andres JL, Gonzales C, Head-Gordon M, Replogle ES, Pople JA (1998) Gaussian 98. Gaussian, Pittsburgh Pa.Google Scholar
- 35.Francl MM, Hout RF, Hehre WJ (1984) J Am Chem Soc 106:563–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Arteca GA, Grant ND (1999) J Comput-Aided Mol Des 13:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar