Advertisement

Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) in the Semantic Web: a multi-dimensional review

  • Marcia Lei Zeng
  • Philipp Mayr
Article

Abstract

Since the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) specification and its SKOS eXtension for Labels (SKOS-XL) became formal W3C recommendations in 2009, a significant number of conventional Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) (including thesauri, classification schemes, name authorities, and lists of codes and terms, produced before the arrival of the ontology-wave) have made their journeys to join the Semantic Web mainstream. This paper uses “LOD KOS” as an umbrella term to refer to all of the value vocabularies and lightweight ontologies within the Semantic Web framework. The paper provides an overview of what the LOD KOS movement has brought to various communities and users. These are not limited to the colonies of the value vocabulary constructors and providers, nor the catalogers and indexers who have a long history of applying the vocabularies to their products. The LOD dataset producers and LOD service providers, the information architects and interface designers, and researchers in sciences and humanities, are also direct beneficiaries of LOD KOS. The paper examines a set of the collected cases (experimental or in real applications) and aims to find the usages of LOD KOS in order to share the practices and ideas among communities and users. Through the viewpoints of a number of different user groups, the functions of LOD KOS are examined from multiple dimensions. This paper focuses on the LOD dataset producers, vocabulary producers, and researchers (as end-users of KOS).

Keywords

Linked Open Data Knowledge Organization Systems LOD KOS functions Personas 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We want to thank all reviewers for their positive and constructive comments which helped to improve this paper. In addition, we thank all our co-organizers of former NKOS workshops and all participants of NKOS-related events for their continuously input and feedback which motivated us to write this paper. Supplementary materials (e.g., high-resolution figures) of this paper are available under https://github.com/PhilippMayr/supplementary-materials/tree/master/KOS-SW-MultidisciplinaryReview.

References

  1. 1.
    Baker, T., Caracciolo, C., Doroszenko, A., Finch, L., Suominen, O., Suri, S.: The Global Agricultural Concept Scheme and Agrisemantics. In: International Conference on Dublin Core & Metadata Applications, October 13–16, 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark (2016). http://dcevents.dublincore.org/IntConf/dc-2016/schedConf/presentations
  2. 2.
    Baker, T., Caracciolo, C., Doroszenko, A., Suominen, O.: GACS core: creation of a global agricultural concept scheme. In: Metadata and Semantics Research, 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22–25, 2016, Proceedings pp. 311–316 . Springer International Publishing, Berlin (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bensmann, F., Zapilko, B., Mayr, P.: Interlinking large-scale library data with authority records. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 4 (March). https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2017.00005 (2017)
  4. 4.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data–design issues. Last updated 2009-06-18. https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html (2006)
  5. 5.
    Binding, C., Tudhope, D.: Improving interoperability using vocabulary Linked Data. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 17(1), 5–21 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borge, S., Guarino, N., Masolo, C.: A pointless theory of space based on strong connection and congruence. In: Proceedings of Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR96), pp. 220–229 (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, Dan M.: Communication Design: Developing Website Documentation for Design and Planning, 2nd edn. New Riders, Berkeley, CA (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buley, L.: The User Experience Team of One: A Research and Design Survival Guide. Rosenfeld Media, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN): CHIN Guide to Museum Standards. Last updated 2016-09-22. http://canada.pch.gc.ca/eng/1443536694304
  10. 10.
    D’Amore, S.: Boost empathy quickly with proto-personas. Blog (2016). http://blog.mural.co/2016/05/06/boost-empathy-quickly-with-proto-personas
  11. 11.
    Garnier, E., Stahl, U., Laporte, M.-A., Kattge, J., Mougenot, I., Kühn, I., Laporte, B., et al.: Towards a thesaurus of plant characteristics: an ecological contribution. J. Ecol. 105(2), 298–309 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garcia, G., Zeng, M.L., Ward, J.: Linked open data (LOD) vocabularies: querying, dumping, re-using, and serving. In: MW17: Museums and the Web Conference, April 19–22, 2017 Cleveland, Ohio, USA (2017). http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/training.html
  13. 13.
    Gothelf, J.: Using proto-personas for executive alignment. UX Magazine. May 1, 2012 Article No :821 (2012). https://uxmag.com/articles/using-proto-personas-for-executive-alignment
  14. 14.
    Isaac, A., Waites, W., Young, J., Zeng, M.: Linked Data Incubator Group: datasets, value vocabularies, and metadata element sets. In: W3C Incubator Group Report (2011). http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/XGR-lld-vocabdataset-20111025/
  15. 15.
    ISO 25964-1:2011 Information and documentation–Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies – Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval. ISO TC 46/SC 9 Working Group on ISO 25964. Leader: Stella Dextre Clarke. Approved and published by ISO 2011-08Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ISO 25964-2:2013 Information and documentation–Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies–Part 2. Interoperability with other vocabularies. ISO TC 46/SC 9 Working Group on ISO 25964. Leader: Stella Dextre Clarke. Approved and published by ISO 2013-03Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krøger, E., Guribye, F., Gjøsæter, T.: Logging and visualizing affective interaction for mental health therapy. Norsk konferanse for organisasjoners bruk at IT (NOKOBIT), [S.l.], v. 23(1) ISSN 1894-7719. http://ojs.bibsys.no/index.php/Nokobit/article/view/272
  18. 18.
    Mayr, P., Tudhope, D., Clarke, S.D., Zeng, M.L., Lin, X.: Recent applications of knowledge organization systems: introduction to a special issue. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 17(1), 1–4 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Menzel, C.: Reference ontologies-application ontologies: either/or or both/and? In: KI Workshop on Reference Ontologies and Application Ontologies (2003). http://bioontology.stanford.edu/wiki/images/d/d9/MenzelOntology.pdf
  20. 20.
    O’Neill, E., Mixter, J.: (1) The case for faceting (2) FAST Linked Data mechanics. In: 76th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T), Montreal, Canada, Nov. 2-6, 2013. http://nkos.slis.kent.edu/ASIST2013/ONeill-Mixter.pptx
  21. 21.
    Pattuelli, M.C.: Personal name vocabularies as Linked Open Data. A case study of jazz artist names. J. Inf. Sci. 38(6), 558–565 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pattuelli, M.C., Provo, A., Thorsen, H.: Ontology building for Linked Open Data: a pragmatic perspective. J. Libr. Metadata 15(3–4), 265–294 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pruitt, J., Adlin, T.: Persona conception and gestation. In: Wilson, C. (ed.) User experience re-mastered: Your guide to getting the right design, pp. 155–219. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sibille-de Grimoüard, C.: The Thesaurus for French Local Archives and the Semantic Web. Proced.-Soc. Behav. Sci. 147, 206–212 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sonvilla-Weiss, S.: ed. Mashup Cultures. Springer, Berlin, ISBN 978-3709100950 (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tudhope, D., Koch, T.: New applications of knowledge organization systems: introduction to a special issue. J. Dig. Inf 4(4) (2004). https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/109/108
  27. 27.
    Tuominen, J., Laurenne, N., Hyvönen, E.: Biological names and taxonomies on the Semantic Web-managing the change in scientific conception. In: The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, 8th Extended Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2011, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29–June 2, 2011, Proceedings, Part II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6644, pp. 255–269 (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Volkan, Ç., Stubkjær, E.: A SKOS vocabulary for linked land administration: cadastre and land administration thesaurus. Land Use Policy 49(2015), 668–679 (2015)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Voss, J.: Radically open cultural heritage data on the web. US National Archives YouTube, Jan 24, 2013. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2pyJ3e_Q0M 1:13:17
  30. 30.
    W3C: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference. W3C Recommendation 18 August 2009. https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/
  31. 31.
    Wallis, R.: Linked data: from library entities to the web of data. In: American Library Association Conference in Las Vegas–June 2014. http://www.slideshare.net/rjw/linked-data-from-library-entities-to-the-web-of-data
  32. 32.
    Zapilko, B., Schaible, J., Mayr, P., Mathiak, B.: TheSoz: a SKOS representation of the thesaurus for the social sciences. Semant. Web J (SWJ) 4(3), 257–63 (2013)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zeng, M.L.: Create microthesauri and other datasets from the Getty LOD vocabularies. In: MW17: Museums and the Web Conference, April 19–22, 2017 Cleveland, Ohio, USA. http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/zeng_microthesauri_getty_lod.pdf
  34. 34.
    Zeng, M.L., Hu, T.: Extending exhibitions to historical journeys through data [in the Semantic Web]. In: MW17: Museums and the Web Conference, April 19–22, 2017 Cleveland, Ohio, USA. http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/zeng_silk_road_tgn.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of InformationKent State UniversityOhioUSA
  2. 2.GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social SciencesCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations