Improving interoperability using vocabulary linked data

Article

Abstract

The concept of Linked Data has been an emerging theme within the computing and digital heritage areas in recent years. The growth and scale of Linked Data has underlined the need for greater commonality in concept referencing, to avoid local redefinition and duplication of reference resources. Achieving domain-wide agreement on common vocabularies would be an unreasonable expectation; however, datasets often already have local vocabulary resources defined, and so the prospects for large-scale interoperability can be substantially improved by creating alignment links from these local vocabularies out to common external reference resources. The ARIADNE project is undertaking large-scale integration of archaeology dataset metadata records, to create a cross-searchable research repository resource. Key to enabling this cross search will be the ‘subject’ metadata originating from multiple data providers, containing terms from multiple multilingual controlled vocabularies. This paper discusses various aspects of vocabulary mapping. Experience from the previous SENESCHAL project in the publication of controlled vocabularies as Linked Open Data is discussed, emphasizing the importance of unique URI identifiers for vocabulary concepts. There is a need to align legacy indexing data to the uniquely defined concepts and examples are discussed of SENESCHAL data alignment work. A case study for the ARIADNE project presents work on mapping between vocabularies, based on the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus as a central hub and employing an interactive vocabulary mapping tool developed for the project, which generates SKOS mapping relationships in JSON and other formats. The potential use of such vocabulary mappings to assist cross search over archaeological datasets from different countries is illustrated in a pilot experiment. The results demonstrate the enhanced opportunities for interoperability and cross searching that the approach offers.

Keywords

Linked Data Controlled vocabularies Thesauri  Alignment Mapping Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus SKOS LOD 

References

  1. 1.
    EUROPEANA project. http://www.europeana.eu/
  2. 2.
    Golub, K., Tudhope, D., Zeng, M., Žumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems: functionality, use, and attributes. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(9), 1901–1916 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zeng, M., Chan, L.: Trends and issues in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 55(5), 377–395 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    SENESCHAL project: semantic enrichment enabling sustainability of archaeological links. University of South Wales, Hypermedia Research Group. http://hypermedia.research.southwales.ac.uk/kos/seneschal/
  5. 5.
    ARIADNE FP7 project: advanced research infrastructure for archaeological dataset networking in Europe. http://www.ariadne-infrastructure.eu/
  6. 6.
    STAR project: semantic technologies for archaeological resources. University of South Wales: Hypermedia Research Group. http://hypermedia.research.southwales.ac.uk/kos/star/
  7. 7.
    STELLAR project: semantic technologies enhancing links and linked data for archaeological resources. University of South Wales: Hypermedia Research Group. http://hypermedia.research.southwales.ac.uk/kos/STELLAR/
  8. 8.
    ISO standard 21127:2014—the CIDOC conceptual reference model (CRM). http://www.cidoc-crm.org/
  9. 9.
    Tudhope, D., May, K., Binding, C., Vlachidis, A.: Connecting archaeological data and grey literature via semantic cross search. Internet archaeology 30 (2011). doi:10.11141/ia.30.5
  10. 10.
    Binding, C., Tudhope, D.: Terminology web services. Knowl. Organ. 37(4), 287–298 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Resource description framework (RDF). W3C. http://www.w3.org/RDF/
  12. 12.
    Archaeology Data Service: Linked Data, http://data.archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/
  13. 13.
    Binding, C., Charno, M., Jeffrey, S., May, K., Tudhope, D.: Template based semantic integration: from legacy archaeological datasets to linked data. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 11(1) (2015) (in press)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richards, J.D., Hardman, C.S.: Stepping back from the trench edge: an archaeological perspective on the development of standards for recording and publication. In: Greengrass, M. & Hughes, L. (eds.) The Virtual Representation of the Past. Ashgate, pp. 101–112 (2008). http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/7795/
  15. 15.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data—the story so far. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 5(3), 1–22 (2009). doi:10.4018/jswis.2009081901 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    HeritageData.org—documentation of web services and widget controls produced as part of the SENESCHAL project. http://www.heritagedata.org/blog/
  17. 17.
    Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). W3C. http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/
  18. 18.
    SPARQL 1.1 query language. W3C (2013). [http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/]
  19. 19.
    Forum on Information Standards in Heritage (FISH) Terminology Working Group. http://www.heritagedata.org/blog/about-heritage-data/fish/
  20. 20.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data—design issues (5 star linked data deployment scheme). http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
  21. 21.
    ISO 25964-2:2013 Information and documentation—thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies—part 2: interoperability with other vocabularies (2013). http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=53658
  22. 22.
    Ontology alignment evaluation initiative. http://oaei.ontologymatching.org
  23. 23.
    Cuenca Grau, B., Dragisic, Z., Eckert, K., Euzenat, J., Ferrara, A., Granada, R., Ivanova, V., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Kempf, A.O., Lambrix, P., Nikolov, A., Paulheim, H., Ritze, D., Scharffe, F., Shvaiko, P., Trojahn, C., Zamazal, O.: Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2013, pp. 29–31 (2013). http://disi.unitn.it/~p2p/OM-2013/oaei13_paper0.pdf
  24. 24.
    Alexander, K., Cyganiak, R., Hausenblad, M., Zhao, J.: Describing linked datasets with the voID vocabulary. W3C interest group note (2011). http://www.w3.org/TR/void/
  25. 25.
    Liang, A., Sini, M.: Mapping AGROVOC and the Chinese agricultural thesaurus: definitions, tools, procedures. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimed. 12(1), 51–62 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    References to tools and papers about link generation techniques. http://esw.w3.org/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData/EquivalenceMining
  27. 27.
    OpenRefine data cleansing and transformation tool. http://openrefine.org/
  28. 28.
    LODRefine (an extension of OpenRefine). https://github.com/sparkica/LODRefine
  29. 29.
    SAIM instance matching application. http://saim.aksw.org/
  30. 30.
    LIMES link discovery framework for metric spaces. http://aksw.org/Projects/LIMES.html
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
    ARIADNE, D12.2 infrastructure design—annex II—ACDM catalogue model, pp. 47–56 (2015). http://www.ariadne-infrastructure.eu/Resources/D12.2-Infrastructure-Design
  33. 33.
    Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT) http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab/dcat/
  34. 34.
    Getty vocabularies as linked open data. http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/lod/
  35. 35.
    SKOS mapping relationships. http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/L4138

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hypermedia Research Group, Faculty of Computing Engineering and ScienceUniversity of South WalesPontypriddUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations