Digital field scholarship and the liberal arts: results from a 2012–13 sandbox

  • James D. ProctorEmail author
  • Kristen Eshleman
  • Tim Chartier
  • Lora Taub-Pervizpour
  • Kristin Bott
  • Juliane L. Fry
  • Chris Koski
  • Tony Moreno


We summarize a recent multi-institutional collaboration in digital field scholarship involving four liberal arts colleges: Davidson College, Lewis & Clark College, Muhlenberg College, and Reed College. Digital field scholarship (DFS) can be defined as scholarship in the arts and sciences for which field-based research and concepts are significant, and digital tools support data collection, analysis, and communication; DFS thus gathers together and extends a wide range of existing scholarship, offering new possibilities for appreciating the connections that define liberal education. Our collaboration occurred as a sandbox, a collective online experiment using a modified WordPress platform (including mapping and other advanced capabilities) built and supported by Lewis & Clark College, with sponsorship provided by the National Institute for Technology in Liberal Education. Institutions selected course-based DFS projects for fall 2012 and/or spring 2013. Projects ranged from documentary photojournalism to home energy efficiency assessment. One key feature was the use of readily available mobile devices and apps for field-based reconnaissance and data collection; another was our public digital scholarship approach, in which student participants shared the process and products of their work via public posts on the DFS website. Descriptive and factor analysis results from anonymous assessment data suggest strong participant response and likely future potential of digital field scholarship across class level and gender. When set into the context of the four institutions that supported the 2012–2013 sandbox, we see further opportunities for digital field scholarship on our and other campuses, provided that an optimal balance is struck between challenges and rewards along technical, pedagogical, and practical axes. Ultimately, digital field scholarship will be judged for its scholarship and for extending the experimental, open-ended inquiry that characterizes liberal education.


Digital Field Scholarship Liberal arts Mapping Mobile device 



We acknowledge student, staff, and faculty participants from our four institutions, who played a key role in ensuring a successful and worthwhile DFS sandbox. The staff at Lewis & Clark Watzek Digital Initiatives assisted with website development and maintenance. Ultimately, the support of The Andrew Mellon Foundation, via a grant to Lewis & Clark’s Environmental Studies Program, afforded us the opportunity to pursue this pilot initiative, for which we are grateful.


  1. 1.
    Ayers, E.: Does digital scholarship have a future? EDUCAUSE Review. Accessed 24 Aug 2014 (2013)
  2. 2.
    Coles, R.: Doing Documentary Work, p. 6. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cronon, W.: Only connect. Am. Sch. 67, 73–80 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davidson, C.N.: Now you See it: How Technology and Brain Science will Transform Schools and Business for the 21st Century. Penguin, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davidson, C.N., Goldberg, D.T.: The Future of Learning Institutions in a Digital Age. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Finkelstein, A.B., Winer, L.R., Buddle, C., Ernst, C.: Tablets in the forest: mobile technology for inquiry-based learning. EDUCAUSE Review. Accessed 23 Nov 2013 (2013)
  7. 7.
    Jameson, F.: Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Duke University Press, Durham (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roth, M.: Beyond the University: Why Liberal Education Matters, p. 18. Yale University Press, New Haven (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor, M.C.: Crisis on Campus: A Bold Plan for Reforming Our Colleges and Universities. Alfred A. Knopf Inc., New York (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Warf, B., Arias, S.: The Spatial Turn. Routledge, London (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • James D. Proctor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kristen Eshleman
    • 2
  • Tim Chartier
    • 3
  • Lora Taub-Pervizpour
    • 4
  • Kristin Bott
    • 5
  • Juliane L. Fry
    • 6
  • Chris Koski
    • 7
  • Tony Moreno
    • 8
  1. 1.Environmental Studies Program—MSC 62Lewis & Clark CollegePortlandUSA
  2. 2.Information Technology ServicesDavidson CollegeDavidsonUSA
  3. 3.Mathematics, Davidson CollegeDavidsonUSA
  4. 4.Media & CommunicationMuhlenberg CollegeAllentownUSA
  5. 5.Computing & Information ServicesReed CollegePortlandUSA
  6. 6.Chemistry and Environmental StudiesReed CollegePortlandUSA
  7. 7.Political Science and Environmental Studies, Reed CollegePortlandUSA
  8. 8.Computing & Information Services, Reed CollegePortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations