International Journal on Digital Libraries

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 105–117 | Cite as

Developing a video game metadata schema for the Seattle Interactive Media Museum

  • Jin Ha Lee
  • Joseph T. Tennis
  • Rachel Ivy Clarke
  • Michael Carpenter
Article

Abstract

As interest in video games increases, so does the need for intelligent access to them. However, traditional organizational systems and standards fall short. To fill this gap, we are collaborating with the Seattle Interactive Media Museum to develop a formal metadata schema for video games. In the paper, we describe how the schema was established from a user-centered design approach and introduce the core elements from our schema. We also discuss the challenges we encountered as we were conducting a domain analysis and cataloging real-world examples of video games. Inconsistent, vague, and subjective sources of information for title, genre, release date, feature, region, language, developer and publisher information confirm the importance of developing a standardized description model for video games.

Keywords

Video games Metadata schema Multimedia Interactive media Cultural artifacts Seattle Interactive Media Museum 

Abbreviations

SIMM

Seattle Interactive Media Museum

FRBR

Functional requirements for bibliographic records

OCLC

Online computer library center

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, D., Delve, J., Pinchbeck, D.: Toward a workable emulation-based preservation strategy: rationale and technical metadata. New Rev Inf Netw 15(2), 110–131 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baca, M.: Visual Resources Association Cataloging Cultural Objects: A Guide to Describing Cultural Works and Their Images. American Library Association, Chicago (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bagnall, P., Dewsbury, G., Sommerville, I.: The limits of Personas. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual DIRC Research Conference, pp. 39–40 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Canadian Library Association: Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (Great Britain), Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA, American Library Association: RDA toolkit: resource description & access. American Library Association, Chicago (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chapman, C.N., Milham, R.: The personas’ new clothes: methodological and practical arguments against a popular method. In: Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 634–636 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cook, T.: The concept of the archival fonds in the post-custodial era: theory, problems and solutions. Archivaria 35, 24–37 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooper, A.: The Inmates are Running the Asylum. Sams, Indianapolis (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dublin Core: Dublin Core metadata element set, version 1.1. http://www.dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Accessed 20 March 2012 (2003)
  9. 9.
    Gee, J.P.: What Video Games Have to Teach us About Learning and Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Global Industry Analysts: Video Games–a Global Strategic Business Report. http://www.strategyr.com/Video_Games_Market_Report.asp. Accessed 20 May 2012 (2009)
  11. 11.
    Grudin, J., Pruitt, J.: Personas, participatory design and product development: an infrastructure for engagement. In: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, pp. 144–161 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hagler, R.: Nonbook materials: chapters 7–11. In: Clack, D.H. (ed.) The Making of a Code: The Issues Underlying AACR2. American Library Association, Chicago (1980)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hanlon, A., Copeland, A.: Using the Dublin Core to document digital art. J. Internet Cat. 4(1–2), 149–161 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hjørland, B.: Domain analysis in information science. Eleven approaches–traditional as well as innovative. J. Documentation 58(4), 422–462 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huth, K.: Probleme and Lösungsansätze zur archivierung von computer programmen–am beispeil der software des ATARI VCS 2600 und des C64. Unpublished master’s thesis, Humboldt Universitat (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    IFLA Study Group on the FRBR: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, Section on Cataloging, Standing Committee: Functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report. K.G. Saur, München (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kruth, M.: An interview with Barbara B. Tillett. Cat. Classif. Q. 32(3), 3–24 (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee, J.H.: Analysis of user need and information features in natural language queries seeking music information. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61(5), 1025–1045 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leigh, A.: Lucy is “Enceinte”: the power of an action in defining a work. Cat. Classif. Q. 33, 3–4 (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McDonough, J., Kirschenbaum, M., Reside, D., Fraistat, N., Jerz, D.: Twisty little passages almost all alike: applying the FRBR model to a classic computer game. Digit. Humanit. Q. 4(2) (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McDonough, J., Olendorf, R., Kirschenbaum, M., Kraus, K., Reside, D., Donahue, R., Phelps, A., Egert, C., Lowood, H., Rojo, S.: Preserving Virtual Worlds Final Report. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/17097. Accessed 17 January 2012 (2010)
  22. 22.
    Millar, L.: The death of the fonds and the resurrection of provenance: archival context in space and time. Archivaria 53, 1–15 (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    OCLC: Digital Archive Metadata Elements. Online Computer Library Center, Dublin (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rinehart, R.: The Media Art Notation System: documenting and preserving digital/media art. Leonardo 40(2), 181–187 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spiteri, L.F.: The use of facet analysis in information retrieval thesauri: an examination of selected guidelines for thesaurus construction. Cat. Classif. Q. 25(1), 21–37 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Svenonius, E.: The intellectual foundation of information organization. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    The Entertainment Software Association: Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. http://www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/ESA_EF_2011.pdf. Accessed 30 March 2012 (2011)
  28. 28.
    Tillett, B.B.: What is FRBR? A conceptual model for the bibliographic universe. http://www.loc.gov/cds/FRBR.html. Accessed 2 October 2011 (2004)
  29. 29.
    Winget, M., Murray, C.: State of the archive: a review of video game archives within the United States. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. ASIS &T, Columbus (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Winget, M.A.: Videogame preservation and massively multiplayer online role-playing games: a review of the literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62(10), 1869–1883 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jin Ha Lee
    • 1
  • Joseph T. Tennis
    • 1
  • Rachel Ivy Clarke
    • 1
  • Michael Carpenter
    • 1
  1. 1.Information School, Mary Gates HallUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations