Advertisement

International Journal on Digital Libraries

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 225–238 | Cite as

Understanding user requirements and preferences for a digital library Web portal

  • Maristella Agosti
  • Franco Crivellari
  • Giorgio Maria Di NunzioEmail author
  • Silvia Gabrielli
Article

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a user study conducted in the context of the TELplus project to gain insights about user needs and preferences for the digital library services offered by The European Library Web portal. The user requirements collection for the Web portal was designed by adopting a comprehensive survey approach. This combined explicit user feedback with implicit usage data so as to provide a more in-depth analysis of user experience with the portal. The analysis conducted shed light on likely motivations for both participant usage and reluctance to use the services provided, leading to more informed decisions on how to refine, improve, and present Web portal services to their future users. The lessons learnt from this case study also contributed to the development of an integrated methodological framework which provided insights for the future design and evaluation of digital library Web portals and services.

Keywords

User requirements for digital library Web portals Preferences for Web portals User survey Log data User interaction with digital contents 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agosti, M.: Log data in digital libraries. In: Agosti, M., Esposito, F., Thanos, C. (eds.) Post-proc. of the 4th Italian Research Conf. on Digital Library Systems, IRCDL 2008, Padua, pp. 115–122. DELOS, Delos (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agosti, M., Di Nunzio, G.M.: Gathering and mining information from web log files. In: Thanos, C., Borri, F., Candela, L. (eds.) DELOS Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4877, pp. 104–113. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agosti, M., Di Nunzio, G.M.: Web log mining: a study of user sessions. In: 10th DELOS Thematic Workshop on Personalized Access, Profile Management, and Context Awareness in Digital Libraries. http://www.dblab.ntua.gr/persdl2007/papers/72.pdf (2007). Last accessed 27 Sept 2011
  4. 4.
    Agosti, M., Angelaki, G., Coppotelli, T., Di Nunzio, G.M.: Analysing HTTP logs of a European DL initiative to maximize usage and usability. In: Goh, D.H.L., Cao, T.H., Sølvberg, I., Rasmussen, E.M. (eds.) 10th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, ICADL 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4822, pp. 35–44. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agosti, M., Di Nunzio, G.M., Niero, A.: From Web log analysis to Web user profiling. In: Thanos, C., Borri, F. (eds.) DELOS Conference 2007. Working Notes, pp. 121–132. Pisa, Italy (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agosti, M., Crivellari, F., Di Nunzio, G.M.: Digital library services using complementary logs. In: Workshop on Understanding the User, Logging and Interpreting User Interactions Search and Retrieval. Held in Conjunction with the 32nd ACM SIGIR Conference, Boston, MA (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agosti, M., Crivellari, F., Di Nunzio, G.M.: A method for combining and analyzing implicit interaction data and explicit preferences of users. In: Workshop on Contextual Information Access, Seeking and Retrieval Evaluation. Held in Conjunction with the 31st European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2009), Toulouse (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Agosti, M., Crivellari, F., Di Nunzio, G.M., Ioannidis, Y., Stamatogiannakis, E., Triantafyllidi, M.L., Vayanou, M.: Searching and browsing digital library catalogues: a combined log analysis for the European library. In: Post-proceedings of the Fifth Italian Research Conference on Digital Library Systems, IRCDL 2009, Padua, 29–30 Jan 2008. DELOS: an Association for Digital Libraries, Delos (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anick, P.G.: Using terminological feedback for web search refinement: a log-based study. In: Proc. of the 26th Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 28 July–1 Aug 2003, Toronto, pp. 88–95. ACM, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Assadi, H., Beauvisage, T., Lupovici, C., Cloarec, T.: Users and uses of online digital libraries in France. In: Koch, T., Sølvberg, I. (eds.) Proc. of the 7th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2003), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2769, pp. 1–12. Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bollen, J., Luce, R.: Evaluation of digital library impact and user communities by analysis of usage patterns. D-Lib. Mag. 8(6) (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borgman C.L.: From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Di Nunzio, G.M., Leveling, J., Mandl, T.: Multilingual log analysis: LogCLEF. In: Proceedings of the 33rd European Conference on Advances in Information Retrieval, ECIR 2011, pp. 675–678. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fuhr N., Tsakonas G., Aalberg T., Agosti M., Hansen P., Kapidakis S., Klas C.P., Kovács L., Landoni M., Micsik A., Papatheodorou C., Peters C., Sølvberg S.: Evaluation of digital libraries. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 8(1), 21–38 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grimes, C., Tang, D., Russell, D.M.: Query logs alone are not enough. In: Amitay, E., Teevan, C.G.M.J. (eds.) Query Log Analysis: Social and Technological Challenges. A Workshop at the 16th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2007), Banff (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hill, L., Dolin, R., Frew, J., Kemp, R.B., Larsgaard, M., Montello, D.R., Rae, M.A., Simpson, J.: User evaluation: summary of the methodologies and results for the Alexandria digital library. In: Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, vol. 34, pp. 225–243. University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ingwersen P., Järvelin K.: The Turn. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jameson, A., Gabrielli, S., Kristensson, P., Reinecke, K., Cena, F., Gena, C., Vernero, F.: How can we support users’ preferential choice? CHI Extended Abstracts, pp. 409–418 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kelly D., Harper D.J., Landau B.: Questionnaire mode effects in interactive information retrieval experiments. Inf. Process. Manag. 44(1), 122–141 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koch, T., Ardö, A., Golub, K.: Browsing and searching behavior in the Renardus web service: a study based on log analysis. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL ’04, pp. 378–378. ACM, New York (2004). doi: 10.1145/996350.996444
  21. 21.
    Mahoui, M., Cunningham, S.J.: A comparative transaction log analysis of two computing collections. In: Borbinha, J.L., Baker, T. (eds.) ECDL, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1923, pp. 418–423. Springer, Berlin (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nicholas D., Huntington P., Watkinson A.: Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis. J. Documentation 61(2), 248–280 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nielsen J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Boston (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Norlin E.: Reference evaluation: a three-step approach-surveys, unobtrusive observations, and focus groups. Coll. Res. Libr. 61(6), 546–553 (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Norlin E., Winters C.: Usability testing for library websites: a hands-on guide. American Library Association, Chicago (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Papatheodorou, C., Tsakonas, G. (eds): Evaluation of digital libraries: an insight into useful applications and methods. Chandos Publishing, Oxford (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pharo N., Järvelin K.: The SST method: a tool for analysing Web information search processes. Inf. Process. Manag. 40(4), 633–654 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Satchell, C., Dourish, P.: Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI. In: Foth, M., Kjeldskov, J., Paay, J. (eds.) OZCHI, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 411, pp. 9–16. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Teevan, J., Adar, E., Jones, R., Potts, M.A.S.: Information re-retrieval: repeat queries in yahoo’s logs. In: Kraaij, W., de Vries, A.P., Clarke, C.L.A., Fuhr, N., Kando, N. (eds.) SIGIR, pp. 151–158. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van Velsen, L., König, F., Paramythis, A.: Assessing the effectiveness and usability of personalized internet search through a longitudinal evaluation. In: UCDEAS-2009: 6th Workshop on User-Centred Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Systems, Trento. http://doc.utwente.nl/68858/ (2009). Last accessed 27 Sept 2011
  31. 31.
    Wilkinson L.: Revising the Pareto chart. Am. Stat. 60(4), 332–334 (2006). doi: 10.1198/000313006X152243 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maristella Agosti
    • 1
  • Franco Crivellari
    • 1
  • Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio
    • 1
    Email author
  • Silvia Gabrielli
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information EngineeringUniversity of PaduaPadovaItaly
  2. 2.Ubiquitous Interaction Group, CREATE-NETTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations