Lessons learned from the design and evaluation of visual information-seeking systems

  • Jens Gerken
  • Mathias Heilig
  • Hans-Christian Jetter
  • Sebastian Rexhausen
  • Mischa Demarmels
  • Werner A. König
  • Harald ReitererEmail author
Regular Paper


Designing information-seeking systems has become an increasingly complex task as today’s information spaces are rapidly growing in quantity, heterogeneity, and dimensionality. The challenge is to provide user interfaces that have a satisfying usability and user experience even for novice users. Although information visualization and interaction design offer solutions, many information-seeking systems such as online catalogs for libraries or web search engines continue to use outdated user-interface concepts developed decades ago. In this paper, we will present four principles that we identified as crucial for the successful design of a modern visual information-seeking system. These are (1) to support various ways of formulating an information need, (2) to integrate analytical and browsing-oriented ways of exploration, (3) to provide views on different dimensions of the information space, and (4) to make search a pleasurable experience. These design principles are based on our experience over a long period in the user-centered design and evaluation of visual information-seeking systems. Accordingly, we will showcase individual designs from our own work of the past 10 years to illustrate each principle and hence narrow the gap between the scientific discussion and the designing practitioner that has often hindered research ideas from becoming reality. However, most of the times search is only one part of a higher level user activity (e.g. writing a paper). Thus future research should focus on the challenges when regarding search in such a broader context. We will use the final two chapters to point out some of these challenges and outline our vision of an integrated and consistent digital work environment named Zoomable Object-oriented Information Landscape.


Human-computer interaction Information visualization Visual information-seeking Interaction design Search Design principles Semantic zooming Digital libraries 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ahlberg, C., Shneiderman, B.: Visual information seeking using the filmfinder. In: Plaisant, C. (ed.) CHI Conference Companion, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 433–434. ACM, Boston (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates M.J.: The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Rev. 13(5), 407–424 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bederson B.B., Clamage A., Czerwinski M.P., Robertson G.G.: Datelens: a fisheye calendar interface for pdas. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 11(1), 90–119 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bier, E., Popat, K., Good, L., Newberger, A.: Zoomable user interface for in-depth reading. In: JCDL ’04: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, pp. 424–424. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borgman C.L.: Why are online catalogs hard to use? lessons learned from information-retrieval studies. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 37(6), 387–400 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borgman C.L.: Why are online catalogs still hard to use. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci 47(7), 493–503 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borgman C.L.: Designing digital libraries for usability. In: Buttenfield , B.P., Van House N. (eds) Digital library use: social practice in design and evaluation, pp. 85–118. ACM, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buering Thorsten, Gerken Jens, Reiterer Harald: Usability of overview-supported zooming on small screens with regard to individual differences in spatial ability. In: AVI’ 2006: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. ACM Press, May (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buering T., Gerken J., Reiterer H.: User interaction with scatterplots on small screens—a comparative evaluation of geometric-semantic zoom and fisheye distortion. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. (Proceedings Visualization/Information Visualization 12, 829–836 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collins D.: Designing Object-Oriented User Interfaces. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cutter C.A.: Rules for a Dictionary Catalog. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1876)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Demarmels, M.: Konzeption und Entwicklung einer Visualisierung für mehrdimensionale Daten. Bachelor-thesis, University of Konstanz (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fowler, R.H., Wilson, B.A., Fowler, W.A.L.: Information navigator: An information system using associative networks for display and retrieval. Technical report (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fruchterman T.M.J., Reingold E.M.: Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw. Pract. Exper. 21(11), 1129–1164 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Furnas G.W.: Generalized fisheye views. SIGCHI Bull. 17(4), 16–23 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gerken, J.: Evaluation eines Metadatenbrowsers—Liste versus Leveltable. Bachelor-thesis, University of Konstanz (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gerken, J., Demarmels, M., Dierdorf, S., Reiterer, H.: Hyperscatter—modellierungs—und zoomtechniken fr punktdiagramme. In: to appear in Mensch & Computer 2008: Viel mehr Interaktion, vol. 8. Konferenz fr interaktive und kooperative Medien, Oldenbourg Verlag (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Good, L., Popat, A.C., Janssen, W.C., Bier, E.: A fluid interface for personal digital libraries. In: ECDL ’05: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pp. 162–173. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gruen, C., Gerken, J., Jetter, H.-C., König, W., Reiterer, H.: Mediovis—a user-centred library metadata browser. In: ECDL 2005: Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Digital Libraries. Springer, Heidleberg (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hasan, M.Z., Golovchinsky, G., Noik, E.G., Charoenkitkarn, N., Chignell, M., Mendelzon, A.O., Modjeska, D.: Browsing local and global information. In: CASCON ’95: Proceedings of the 1995 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research, p. 27. IBM Press (1995)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., Lehner, K.: Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software’s appeal. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 201–208. ACM Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hearst M., Elliott A., English J., Sinha R., Swearingen K., Yee K.-P.: Finding the flow in web site search. Commun. ACM 45(9), 42–49 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marti, A.H.: Tilebars visualization of term distribution information in full text information access. In: CHI ’95: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 59–66. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jetter, H.-C.: Informationsarchitektur und Informationsvisualisierung für die Post-WIMP Ära. Master-thesis, University of Konstanz (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jetter, H.-C., Gerken, J., König, W.A., Christian, G., Reiterer, H.: Hypergrid—accessing complex information spaces. In: HCI UK 2005: People and Computers XIX—The Bigger Picture, Proceedings of the 19th British HCI Group Annual Conference. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jones S.: Vquery: a graphical user interface for boolean query specification and dynamic result preview. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 2, 207–223 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kahlbach, J.: Designing for information foragers: a behavioral model for information seeking on the world wide web. internetworking, December (2000)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kaptelinin V., Czerwinski M.: Beyond the Desktop Metaphor: Designing Integrated Digital Work Environments. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Karger D.R., Jones W.: Data unification in personal information management. Commun. ACM 49(1), 77–82 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Klein, P., Reiterer, H.: The circlesegmentview—a visualization for query preview and visual filtering. In: SPIE 2005: Visualization and Data Analysis, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5669, pp. 327–338. IS&T/SPIE (2005)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kohonen T., Kaski S., Lagus K., Salojarvi J., Paatero V., Saarela A.: Self organization of a massive document collection. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11, 574–585 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kuhlthau C.C.: Seeking Meaning: a Process Approach to Library and Information Services, vol. 2nd edn. Libraries Unlimited, Englewood (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Limbach, T., Reiterer, H., Klein, P., Müller, F.V.: A visual metadata browser. In: Interact 2003: Proceedings of the Ninth IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 993–996. IOS Press (2003)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Makri S., Blandford A., Cox A.L.: Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of academic lawyers: From ellis’s model to design. Inf. Process. Manage. 44(2), 613–634 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mann, T.: Visualization of Search Results from the World Wide Web. phdthesis, University of Konstanz (2001)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marchionini G.: Information Seeking in Electronic Environments (Cambridge Series on Human-Computer Interaction). Cambridge University Press, London (1997)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Müller-Prove, M., Ludolph, F.: Dueling interaction models of personal-computing and web-computing. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Methodic and Didactic Challenges of the History of Informatics (MEDICHI). Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft (2007)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mußler, G.: Retrieving Business Information from the WWW. phdthesis, University of Konstanz (2002)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nikolai, R., Kramerand, R., Steinhaus, M., Felluga, B., Plini, P.: Genthes: a general thesaurus browser for web-based catalogue systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE Meta-Data’99 (1999)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    North C., Shneiderman B.: Snap-together visualization: can users construct and operate coordinated visualizations?. Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 53(5), 715–739 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Perlin, K., Fox, D.: Pad: an alternative approach to the computer interface. In: SIGGRAPH ’93: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pp. 57–64. ACM, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Perugini, S., McDevitt, K., Richardson, R., Pérez-Quinones, M.A., Shen, R., Ramakrishnan, N., Williams, C., Fox, E.A.: Enhancing usability in citidel: multimodal, multilingual, and interactive visualization interfaces. In: JCDL ’04: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, pp. 315–324. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Raskin J.: The Humane Interface: New Directions for Designing Interactive Systems (ACM Press). Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2000)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Reiterer H., Tullius G., Mann T.M.: Insyder a content-based visual-information-seeking system for the web. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 5(1), 25–41 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rexhausen, S., Demarmels, M., Jetter, H.-C., Heilig, M., Gerken, J., Reiterer, H.: Blockbuster—a visual explorer for motion picture data. In: INFOVIS ’07: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (INFOVIS’07). IEEE Computer Society, Nov (2007). [Summary of contest entry for InfoVis Contest 2007. Awarded with 3rd place]Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rüger, M., Preim, B., Ritter, A.: Zoom navigation exploring large information and application spaces. In: AVI ’96: Proceedings of the workshop on Advanced visual interfaces, pp. 40–48. ACM, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schaefer, A., Jordan, M., Klas, C.-P., Fuhr, N.: Active support for query formulation in virtual digital libraries: a case study with daffodil. In: ECDL ’05: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pp. 414–425. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Shneiderman B.: Designing the User Interface, 3rd edn., vol. 7. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shneiderman B.: Leonardo’s Laptop: Human Needs and the New Computing Technologies. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Spoerri, A.: Infocrystal: a visual tool for information retrieval. PhD thesis, Cambridge, MA (1995)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Trumble K., Marshall R.M.: The Library of Alexandria. Clarion Books, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wang, J., Agrawal, A., Bazaza, A., Angle, S., Fox, E.A., North, C.: Enhancing the envision interface for digital libraries. In: JCDL ’02: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, pp. 275–276. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Williamson, C., Shneiderman, B.: The dynamic homefinder: evaluating dynamic queries in a real-estate information exploration system. In: SIGIR ’92: Proceedings of the 15th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp. 338–346. ACM Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jens Gerken
    • 1
  • Mathias Heilig
    • 1
  • Hans-Christian Jetter
    • 1
  • Sebastian Rexhausen
    • 1
  • Mischa Demarmels
    • 1
  • Werner A. König
    • 1
  • Harald Reiterer
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.University of Konstanz, Human-Computer Interaction GroupKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations