International Journal on Digital Libraries

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 82–92

From physical to digital: a case study of computer scientists’ behaviour in physical libraries

Regular contribution


There has been substantial research on various aspects of people’s usage of physical libraries but relatively little on their interaction with individual library artefacts; that is: books, journals, and papers. We have studied people’s behaviour when working in physical libraries, focusing particularly on how they interact with these artefacts, how they evaluate them, and how they interact with librarians. This study provides a better understanding of how people interact with paper information, from which we can draw implications for some requirements of the design of digital libraries, while recognising that the term ‘library’ is a metaphor when applied to electronic document collections. In particular, improved communication with other library users and with librarians could facilitate more rapid access to relevant information and support services, and structuring information presentation so that users can make rapid assessments of its relevance would improve the efficiency of many information searches.


HCI Digital libraries User requirements Physical libraries  


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adams A, Blandford A (2002) Digital libraries in academia: challenges and changes. In: Lim E-P, Foo S, Khoo C, Chen H, Fox E, Urs S, Costantino T (eds) Digital libraries: people, knowledge and technology. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2555. Springer, Berlin, pp 392–403Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson JR (1990) Cognitive psychology and its implications. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bishop AP (1998) Digital libraries and knowledge disaggregation: the use of journal article components. In: Proceedings of ACM DL’98, pp 29–39Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blandford A, Stelmaszewska H, Bryan-Kinns N (2001) Use of multiple digital libraries: a case study. In: Proceedings of JCDL 2001. ACM Press, Roanoke, Virginia, USA, pp 179–188Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borgman CL (2000) From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: access to information in the networked world. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Covi L, Kling R (1997) Organisational dimensions of effective digital library use: closed rational and open natural system model. In: Kiesler S (ed) Culture of the Internet. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp 343–360Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crabtree A, Twidale M, O’Brien J, Nichols M (1997) Talking in the library: implications for the design of digital libraries. In: Proceedings of DL’97. ACM Press, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp 221–228Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dillon A, McKnight C, Richardson J (1993) Space – the final chapter or why physical representations are not semantic intentions. In: McKnight C, Dillon A, Richardson J (eds) Hypertext: a psychological perspective. Horwood, New York, pp 169–191Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dillon A (1992) Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics 35(10):1297–1326Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dix A, Finlay J, Abowd G, Beale R (1998) Human computer interaction, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duff WM, Johnson CA (2002) Accidentally found on purpose: information-seeking behavior of historians in archives. Libr Q 72:472–496Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dumas C, Plenacoste P (2002) Libraries: comparisons between the real and the virtual in 3D, 2D zoomable and 2D arborescent. In: Blandford A, Buchanan G (eds) Proceedings of the JCDL workshop on usability, pp 11–14Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duncker E (2002) Cross-cultural usability of the library metaphor. In: Proceedings of the ACM–IEEE joint conference on digital libraries. ACM, New York, pp 223–230Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ellis D (1989) A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. J Doc 45(3):171–212Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ellis D, Cox D, Hall K (1993) A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. J Doc 49(4):356–369Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ellis D, Haugan M (1997) Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. J Doc 53(4):384–403Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ford N (1999) Information retrieval and creativity: towards support for the original thinker. J Doc 55(5):528–542Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Galliers JR (1991) Cooperative interaction as strategic belief revision. In: Deen SM (ed) Cooperating knowledge based systems. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jones S, McInnes S, Staveley M (1999) A graphical user interface for Boolean query specification. Int J Digital Libr 2(2–3):207–223Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuhlthau C (1988) Longitudinal case studies of the information search process of users in libraries. Libr Inf Sci Res 10(3):257–304Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marchionini G, Shneiderman B (1988) Finding facts versus browsing knowledge in hypertext systems. IEEE Comput 70–79Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marchionini G (1995) Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marshall CC, Golovchinsky G, Price MN (2001) Digital libraries and mobility. Commun ACM 44(5):55–56Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Muter P, Maurutto P (1991) Reading and skimming from computer screens: the paperless office revisited. Behav Inf Technol 10(4):257–266Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muter P, Latermouille AS, Treunit WC, Beam P (1982) Extended reading of continuous text on television screens. Hum Factors 24:501–508Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nichols DM, Twidale MB, Paice CD (1997) Recommendation and usage in the digital library. URL: Scholar
  27. 27.
    O’Hara K, Sellen A (1997) A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In: Proceedings of CHI’97. ACM Press, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp 335–342Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roberts RM (1989) Serendipity: accidental discoveries in science. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ross CS (1999) Finding without seeking: the information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure. Inf Process Manage 3:783–799Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stelmaszewska H, Blandford A (2002) Patterns of interactions: user behaviour in response to search results. In: Blandford A, Buchanan G (eds) Proceedings of the JCDL workshop on usability, pp 29–32Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stone S (1982) Humanities scholars – information needs and uses. J Doc 38(4):292–313Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Toms EG (2000) Understanding and facilitating the browsing of electronic text. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52:423–452Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Theng YL, Mohd-Nasir N, Thimbleby H (2000) Purpose and usability of digital libraries. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on digital libraries, pp 238–239Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Theng YL (2002) Information therapy in digital libraries. In: Lim E-P, Foo S, Khoo C, Chen H, Fox E, Urs S, Costantino T (eds) Digital libraries: people, knowledge and technology. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2555. Springer, Berlin, pp 452–464Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Twidale MB, Nichols DM (1998) Using studies of collaborative activity in physical environments to inform the design of digital libraries. Presented at the CSCW’98 workshop on collaborative and co-operative information seeking in digital information environments. (Also as Tech Rep CSEG/11/98, Computing Department, Lancaster University)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vakkari P, Hakala N (2000) Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance. J Doc 56(5):540–562Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Warwick C, Carty C (2001) Only connect, a study of the problems caused by platform specificity and researcher isolation in humanities computing. In: Hubler A, Linde P, Smith JWT (eds) Electronic publishing ’01: 2001 in the digital publishing odyssey. Proceedings of the 5th international ICCC/IFIP conference on electronic publishing, pp 36–47Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Watson-Boone R (1994) The information needs and habits of humanities scholars. Ref Q 34(2):203–216Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Witten IH, Nevill-Manning CG, McNab R, Cunningham SJ (1998) A public digital library based on full-text retrieval: collections and experience. Commun ACM 41(4):71–75Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interaction Design CentreMiddlesex UniversityUK
  2. 2.UCL Interaction CentreUniversity College LondonUK

Personalised recommendations