International Journal on Digital Libraries

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 71–81

The unseen and unacceptable face of digital libraries

Regular contribution
  • 128 Downloads

Abstract

The social and organisational aspects of digital libraries (DLs) are often overlooked, but this paper reviews how they can affect users’ awareness and acceptance of DLs. An analysis of research conducted within two contrasting domains (clinical and academic) is presented which highlights issues of user interactions, work practices and organisational social structures. The combined study comprises an analysis of 98 in-depth interviews and focus groups with lecturers, librarians and hospital clinicians. The importance of current and past roles of the library, and how users interacted with it, are revealed. Web-based DLs, while alleviating most library resource and interaction problems, require a change in librarians’ and DL designers’ roles and interaction patterns if they are to be implemented acceptably and effectively. Without this role change, users will at best be unaware of these digital resources and at worst feel threatened by them. The findings of this paper highlight the importance of DL design and implementation of the social context and supporting user communication (i.e., collaboration and consultation) in information searching and usage activities.

Keywords

Digital libraries User communities Social structures Usability Grounded Theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams A, Blandford A (2001) Digital libraries in a clinical setting: friend or foe. In: Proceedings of ECDL’01, Damstadt, Germany, 4–9 September 2001. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 231–224Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams A, Blandford A (2002a) Acceptability of medical digital libraries. Health Informat J 8(2):58–66Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams A, Blandford A (2002b) Digital libraries in academia: challenges and changes. In: Proceedings of ICADL’02, Digital libraries: people, knowledge and technology, Singapore, 11–14 December 2002. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 392–403Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adams A, Sasse MA (1999) The user is not the enemy. Commun ACM Vol. 42 (12) :40–46Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bakeri A, Bakar A, Abdoulaye K (2002) Collection development for the digital age: the case of Malaysia. In: Proceedings of ICADL’02, Digital libraries: people, knowledge and technology, Singapore, 11–14 December 2002. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 366–378Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bishop AP (1999) Making digital libraries go: comparing use across genres. In: Proceedings of ACM DL’99, Berkeley, CA, 11–14 August 1999. ACM Press, New York, pp 94–103Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blandford A, Stelmaszewska H, Bryan-Kinns N (2001) Use of multiple digital libraries: a case study. In: Proceedings of JCDL’01, Roanoke, VA, 24–28 June 2001. ACM Press, New York, pp 179–188Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borgman CL (2000) From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: access to information in the networked world. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caidi N (2001) Technology and values: lessons from central and eastern Europe. In: Proceedings of JCDL’01, Roanoke, VA, 24–28 June 2001. ACM Press, New York, pp 176–177Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Choo CW (1995) Information management for the intelligent organization: the art of scanning the environment, 3rd edn. Information Today, ASIS Monograph, Medford, NJGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chowdhury GG (2002) Digital divide: How can digital libraries bridge the gap. In: Proceedings of ICADL’02, Digital libraries: people, knowledge and technology, Singapore, 11–14 December 2002. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 379–391Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cicourel AV (1990) The integration of distributed knowledge in collaborative medical diagnosis. In: Galegher J, Draut RE, Egido C (eds) Intellectual teamwork. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 221–242Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Covi L, Kling R (1997) Organisational dimensions of effective digital library use: closed rational and open natural systems model. In: Kiesler S (ed) Culture of the Internet. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 343–360Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crabtree A, Twidale M, O’Brien J, Nichols M (1997) Talking in the library: implications for the design of digital libraries. In: Proceedings of DL’97, Philadelphia, 23–26 July 1997. ACM Press, New York, pp 221–228Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cunningham SJ (2002) Building a digital library form the ground up: an examination of emergent information resources in the machine learning community. In: Proceedings of ICADL’02, Digital libraries: people, knowledge and technology, Singapore, 11–14 December 2002. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 301–302Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dunker E (2002) Cross-cultural usability of the library metaphor. In: Proceedings of JCDL’02, Portland, OR, 14–18 July 2002. ACM Press, New York, pp 223–230Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gremy F, Bonnin M (1995) Evaluation of automatic health information systems: what and how: assessment and evaluation of information technologies. In: Gennip E, Talmon JL (eds) Medicine van. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 9–20Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grudin J (1994) Groupware and social dynamics: eight challengers for developers. Commun ACM 37:73–105Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harrison GS (1991) The Winchester experience with the TDS hospital information system. Br J Urol 67(5):532–535Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heathfield H (1999) The rise and fall of expert systems in medicine. Expert Sys 16(3):183–188Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heathfield H, Pitty D, Hanka R (1998) Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges. Br Med J 316:1959–1961Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kajberg L (1997) Emerging public librarian roles and skills. Libr Career Develop 5(1):12–22Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kling R (1999) What is social informatics and why does it matter? D-lib Mag 5(1). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january99/kling/01kling.htmlGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marchionini G, Nolet V, Williams H, Ding W, Beale Jr J, Rose A, Gordon A, Enomoto E, Harbinson L (1997) Content + connectivity \(\Rightarrow\) community: Digital resources for a learning community. In: Proceedings of ACM digital libraries (DL’97), Philadelphia, 23–26 July 1997. ACM Press, New York, pp 212–220Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morgan G (1991) Images of organization. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reddy M, Dourish P (2002) A finger on the pulse: temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work. In: Proceedings of ACM CSCW’02, New Orleans, LA, 16–20 November 2002. ACM Press, New York, pp 344–353Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Richman J (1987) Medicine and health. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sackett D, Rosenberg W, Gray M, Haynes B, Richardson S (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Br Med J 312:71–72Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schein E (1990) Organizational culture. Am Psychol 45:109–119Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schiff L, Van House N, Butler M (1997) Understanding complex information environments: a social analysis of watershed planning. In: Proceedings of ACM digital libraries (DL’97), Philadelphia, 23–26 July 1997. ACM Press, New York, pp 161–168Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schneider K, Wagner I (1993) Constructing the ‘Dossier Representatif’: computer-based information sharing in French hospitals. Comput Support Cooperat Work 1:229–253Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Symon G, Long K, Ellis J (1996) The coordination of work activities: co-operation and conflict in a hospital context. Comput Support Cooperat Work 5(1):1–31Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Theng YL, Duncker E, Mohd Nasir N, Buchanan G, Thimbleby H (1999) Design guidelines and user-centred digital libraries. In: Abiteboul S, Vercoustre A (eds) Proceedings of ECDL’99, Paris, 22–24 September 1999, pp 167–183Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Theng YL (2002) Information therapy in digital libraries. In: Proceedings of ICADL’02, Digital libraries: people, knowledge and technology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 452–464Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Turner B (1987) Medical power and social knowledge. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wenger E (1999) Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    White HS (1994) Our retreat to Moscow and beyond. Libr J August:54–55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCL Interaction CentreUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations