, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 119–132 | Cite as

Biogeography of thermophiles and predominance of Thermus scotoductus in domestic water heaters

  • Regina L. Wilpiszeski
  • Zhidan Zhang
  • Christopher H. HouseEmail author
Original Paper


Built systems such as water heaters can harbor extremophiles similar to those residing in natural hot springs, but the extent of colonization is not well understood. To address this, we conducted a survey of thermophilic microorganisms in household water heaters across the United States. Filter samples and inoculated cultures were collected by citizen-scientists from 101 homes. Draft genomes were assembled from cultured isolates and 16S rRNA genes were sequenced from filter samples. 28% of households harbored communities with unambiguous DNA signatures of thermophilic organisms, 36% of households provided viable inocula, and 21% of households had both. All of the recovered cultures as well as the community sequencing results revealed Thermus scotoductus to be the dominant thermophile in domestic water heaters, with a minority of water heaters also containing Meiothermus species and a few containing Aquificae. Sequence distance comparisons show that allopatric speciation does not appear to be a strong control on T. scotoductus distribution. Our results demonstrate that thermophilic organisms are widespread in hot tap water, and that Thermus scotoductus preferentially colonizes water heaters at the expense of local environmental Thermus strains.


Thermophiles Biogeography Microbial ecology Citizen science Built environment 



This work was supported by NASA Astrobiology Institute cooperative agreement #NNA09DA76A. The citizen-science outreach was conducted by Pennsylvania Space Grant with assistance from the National Space Grant Consortium. We thank Heather Nelson, who helped facilitate the citizen science project. The work was funded by the NASA Astrobiology Institute (via the Penn State Astrobiology Research Center) and NASA's National Space Grant College and Fellowship Program (via the Pennsylvania Space Grant Consortium).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Supplementary material

792_2018_1066_MOESM1_ESM.docx (12.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12910 kb)


  1. Andrews S (2010) FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Accessed Oct 2013
  2. Bagh LK, Albrechtsen H-J, Arvin E, Ovesen K (2004) Distribution of bacteria in a domestic hot water system in a Danish apartment building. Water Res 38:225–235. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balkwill DL, Kieft TL, Tsukuda T et al (2004) Identification of iron-reducing Thermus strains as Thermus scotoductus. Extremophiles 8:37–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D et al (2012) SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beffa T, Blanc M, Lyon PF et al (1996) Isolation of Thermus strains from hot composts (60–80 °C). Appl Environ Microbiol 62:1723–1727Google Scholar
  6. Brock TD, Boylen KL (1973) Presence of thermophilic bacteria in laundry and domestic hot-water heaters. Appl Microbiol 25:72–76Google Scholar
  7. Brock TD, Freeze H (1969) Thermus aquaticus gen. n. and sp. n., a nonsporulating extreme thermophile. J Bacteriol 98:289–297Google Scholar
  8. Brown BP, Brown SR, Senko JM (2012) Microbial communities associated with wet flue gas desulfurization systems. Front Microbiol 30:412. Google Scholar
  9. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V et al (2009) BLAST + : architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA et al (2012) Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6:1621–1624. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Case RJ, Boucher Y, Dahllof I et al (2006) Use of 16S rRNA and rpoB Genes as molecular markers for microbial ecology studies. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:278–288. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Debelius JW, Vázquez-Baeza Y, McDonald D et al (2016) Turning participatory microbiome research into usable data: lessons from the American Gut Project. J Microbiol Biol Educ 17:46–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC et al (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C et al (2015) Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ 3:e1319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fierer N, Jackson RB (2006) The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:626–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flores GE, Bates ST, Knights D et al (2011) Microbial biogeography of public restroom surfaces. PLoS One 6:e28132. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flores GE, Bates ST, Caporaso JG et al (2012) Diversity, distribution and sources of bacteria in residential kitchens. Environ Microbiol 15:588–596. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galtier N, Lobry JR (1997) Relationships between genomic G + C content, RNA secondary structures, and optimal growth temperature in prokaryotes. J Mol Evol 44:632–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilbert JA, Jansson JK, Knight R (2014) The Earth Microbiome project: successes and aspirations. BMC Biol 12:156. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gounder K, Brzuszkiewicz E, Liesegang H et al (2011) Sequence of the hyperplastic genome of the naturally competent Thermus scotoductus SA-01. BMC Genomics 12:577. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta RS, Lali R (2013) Molecular signatures for the phylum Aquificae and its different clades: proposal for division of the phylum Aquificae into the emended order Aquificales, containing the families Aquificaceae and Hydrogenothermaceae, and a new order desulfurobacteriales ord. nov., containing the family Desulfurobacteriaceae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 104:349–368. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G (2013) QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hedlund BP, Staley JT (2004) Microbial Endemism and Biogeography. In: Bull AT (ed) Microbial diversity and bioprospecting. ASM Press, New York, pp 225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hreggvidsson GO, Skirnisdottir S, Smit B et al (2006) Polyphasic analysis of Thermus isolates from geothermal areas in Iceland. Extremophiles 10:563–575. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hudson JA, Morgan HW, Daniel RM (1986) A numerical classification of some Thermus Isolates. Microbiology 132:531–540. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huson DH, Beier S, Flade I et al (2016) MEGAN community edition—interactive exploration and analysis of large-scale microbiome sequencing data. PLoS Comput Biol 12:e1004957. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ji P, Rhoads WJ, Edwards MA, Pruden A (2017) Impact of water heater temperature setting and water use frequency on the building plumbing microbiome. ISME J 11:1318–1330. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kawasumi T, Igarashi Y (1984) Hydrogenobacter thermophilus gen. nov., sp. nov., an extremely thermophilic, aerobic, hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 34:370. Google Scholar
  30. Kelley ST, Gilbert JA (2013) Studying the microbiology of the indoor environment. Genome Biol 14:202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kieft TL, Fredrickson JK, Onstott TC et al (1999) Dissimilatory reduction of Fe(III) and other electron acceptors by a Thermus isolate. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1214–1221Google Scholar
  32. King CE (2013) Diversity and activity of aerobic thermophilic carbon monoxide-oxidizing bacteria on Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. Dissertation, Louisiana State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  33. Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR (2001) The national human activity pattern survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 11:231–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT et al (2013) Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5112–5120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kristjánsson JK, Hjörleifsdóttir S, Marteinsson VT, Alfredsson GA (1994) Thermus scotoductus, sp. nov., a pigment producing thermophilic bacterium from hot tap water in Iceland and including Thermus sp. X-1. Syst Appl Microbiol 17:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lévesque B, Lavoie M, Joly J (2004) Residential water heater temperature: 49 or 60°C? Can J Infect Dis 15:11–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li H (2013) Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA–MEM. arXiv:1303.3997v2[q-bio.GN]
  39. Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A et al (2017) Cluster: cluster analysis basics and extensions. R Package Version 2:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martiny AC, Albrechtsen HJ, Arvin E, Molin S (2005) Identification of bacteria in biofilm and bulk water samples from a nonchlorinated model drinking water distribution system: detection of a large nitrite-oxidizing population associated with Nitrospira spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8611–8617. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martiny JBH, Bohannan BJM, Brown JH et al (2006) Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nat Rev Micro 4:102–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Masurat P, Fru EC, Pedersen K (2005) Identification of Meiothermus as the dominant genus in a storage system for spent nuclear fuel. J Appl Microbiol 98:727–740. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2013) Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nobre MF, Da Costa MS (2001) The genus Meiothermus. Bergey’s Man Syst Bacteriol 1:414–420Google Scholar
  45. O’Malley MA (2008) “Everything is everywhere: but the environment selects”: ubiquitous distribution and ecological determinism in microbial biogeography. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 39:314–325. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2017) Vegan: community ecology. R package verison 2.4-2.
  47. O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR et al (2016) Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D733–D745. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT et al (2015) CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pask-Hughes R, Williams RA (1975) Extremely thermophilic gram-negative bacteria from hot tap water. J Gen Microbiol 88:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Popescu A-A, Huber KT, Paradis E (2012) ape 3.0: new tools for distance-based phylogenetics and evolutionary analysis in R. Bioinformatics 28:1536–1537. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reno ML, Held NL, Fields CJ et al (2009) Biogeography of the Sulfolobus islandicus pan-genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:8605–8610. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rhoads WJ, Ji P, Pruden A, Edwards MA (2015) Water heater temperature set point and water use patterns influence Legionella pneumophila and associated microorganisms at the tap. Microbiome 3:67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rhodes ME, Oren A, House CH (2012) Dynamics and persistence of dead sea microbial populations as shown by high-throughput sequencing of rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:2489–2492. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saghatelyan A, Poghosyan L, Panosyan H, Birkeland NK (2015) Draft genome sequence of Thermus scotoductus strain K1, isolated from a geothermal Spring in Karvachar, Nagorno Karabakh. Genome Announc 3:e01346–15–e01346–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Santos MA, Williams RAD, Da Costa MS (1989) Numerical taxonomic study of Thermus isolates from hot springs in Portugal. Syst Appl Microbiol 12:310–315. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Savage AM, Hills J, Driscoll K et al (2016) Microbial diversity of extreme habitats in human homes. PeerJ 4:e2376. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T et al (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmeisser C, Stockigt C, Raasch C et al (2003) Metagenome survey of biofilms in drinking-water networks. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:7298–7309. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shen W, Le S, Li Y, Hu F (2016) SeqKit: a cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS One 11:e0163962. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang H, Edwards M, Falkinham JO, Pruden A (2012) Molecular survey of the occurrence of Legionella spp., Mycobacterium spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Amoeba hosts in two chloraminated drinking water distribution systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:6285–6294. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whitaker RJ (2003) Geographic barriers isolate endemic populations of hyperthermophilic Archaea. Science 301:976–978. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Whitaker RJ, Banfield JF (2006) Population genomics in natural microbial communities. Trends Ecol Evol 21:508–516. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitman WB, Rainey FA, Kampfer P et al (eds) (2015) Bergey’s manual of systematics of archaea and bacteria. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  64. Wickham H (2010) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Regina L. Wilpiszeski
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhidan Zhang
    • 1
  • Christopher H. House
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Biosciences DivisionOak Ridge National LabOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations