Genetic background of enhanced radioresistance in an anhydrobiotic insect: transcriptional response to ionizing radiations and desiccation
- 894 Downloads
It is assumed that resistance to ionizing radiation, as well as cross-resistance to other abiotic stresses, is a side effect of the evolutionary-based adaptation of anhydrobiotic animals to dehydration stress. Larvae of Polypedilum vanderplanki can withstand prolonged desiccation as well as high doses of ionizing radiation exposure. For a further understanding of the mechanisms of cross-tolerance to both types of stress exposure, we profiled genome-wide mRNA expression patterns using microarray techniques on the chironomid larvae collected at different stages of desiccation and after exposure to two types of ionizing radiation—70 Gy of high-linear energy transfer (LET) ions (4He) and the same dose of low-LET radiation (gamma rays). In expression profiles, a wide transcriptional response to desiccation stress that much exceeded the amount of up-regulated transcripts to irradiation exposure was observed. An extensive group of coincidently up-regulated overlapped transcripts in response to desiccation and ionizing radiation was found. Among this, overlapped set of transcripts was indicated anhydrobiosis-related genes: antioxidants, late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, and heat-shock proteins. The most overexpressed group was that of protein-L-isoaspartate/D-aspartate O-methyltransferase (PIMT), while probes, corresponding to LEA proteins, were the most represented. Performed functional analysis showed strongly enriched gene ontology terms associated with protein methylation. In addition, active processes of DNA repair were detected. We assume that the cross-tolerance of the sleeping chironomid to both desiccation and irradiation exposure comes from a complex mechanism of adaptation to anhydrobiosis.
KeywordsBioinformatics and evolutionary relationship of enzymes Molecular biology Radiation tolerance Anhydrobiosis
This work was supported in part by the Grants-in-Aid from MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number 16K07308, 25252060, 16K15073, and 15H05622) and a part of this study is also the result of the project “Characterization of the Mechanisms Underlying the Radiation Resistance Associated with Cryptobiosis” carried out under the Grant “Strategic Promotion Program for Basic Nuclear Research” by MEXT. Bioinformatics analysis was supported by Russian Science Foundation Grant for international groups (No. 14-44-00022).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Cornette R, Kanamori Y, Watanabe M, Nakahara Y, Gusev O, Mitsumasu K, Kadono-Okuda K, Shimomura M, Mita K, Kikawada T, Okuda T (2010) Identification of anhydrobiosis-related genes from an expressed sequence tag database in the cryptobiotic midge Polypedilum vanderplanki (Diptera; Chironomidae). J Biol Chem 285(46):35889–35899. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.150623 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Gusev O, Nakahara Y, Vanyagina V, Malutina L, Cornette R, Sakashita T, Hamada N, Kikawada T, Kobayashi Y, Okuda T (2010) Anhydrobiosis-associated nuclear DNA damage and repair in the sleeping chironomid: linkage with radioresistance. PLoS One 5(11):e14008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Gusev O, Suetsugu Y, Cornette R, Kawashima T, Logacheva MD, Kondrashov AS, Penin AA, Hatanaka R, Kikuta S, Shimura S, Kanamori H, Katayose Y, Matsumoto T, Shagimardanova E, Alexeev D, Govorun V, Wisecaver J, Mikheyev A, Koyanagi R, Fujie M, Nishiyama T, Shigenobu S, Shibata TF, Golygina V, Hasebe M, Okuda T, Satoh N, Kikawada T (2014) Comparative genome sequencing reveals genomic signature of extreme desiccation tolerance in the anhydrobiotic midge. Nat Commun 5:4784. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5784 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ (2006) Radiobiology for the radiologist, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins p 546Google Scholar
- Han W, Yu PKN (2010) Ionizing radiation, DNA double strand break and mutation. Chapter 7. In: Advances in genetics research, Vol. 4. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
- McGill LM, Shannon AJ, Pisani D, Félix MA, Ramløv H, Dix I, Wharton DA, Burnell AM (2015) Anhydrobiosis and freezing-tolerance: adaptations that facilitate the establishment of Panagrolaimus nematodes in polar habitats. PLoS One 10(3):e0116084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116084 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Moskalev A, Zhikrivetskaya S, Krasnov G, Shaposhnikov M, Proshkina E, Borisoglebsky D, Danilov A, Peregudova D, Sharapova I, Dobrovolskaya E, Solovev I, Zemskaya N, Shilova L, Snezhkina A, Kudryavtseva A (2015) A comparison of the transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster in response to entomopathogenic fungus, ionizing radiation, starvation and cold shock. BMC Genom 16(Suppl 13):S8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-16-S13-S8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Musilova M, Wright G, Ward JM, Dartnell LR (2015) Isolation of radiation-resistant bacteria from Mars analog Antarctic dry valleys by preselection, and the correlation between radiation and desiccation resistance. Astrobiology 15(12):1076–1090. doi: 10.1089/ast.2014.1278 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rebecchi L, Altiero T, Guidetti R (2007) Anhydrobiosis: the extreme limit of desiccation tolerance. ISJ 4:65–81Google Scholar
- Schmitt FJ, Renger G, Friedrich T, Kreslavski VD, Zharmukhamedov SK, Los DA, Kuznetsov VV, Allakhverdiev SI (2014) Reactive oxygen species: re-evaluation of generation, monitoring and role in stress-signaling in phototrophic organisms. Biochim Biophys Acta 1837(6):835–848. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.02.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Somme L (1996) Anhydrobiosis and cold tolerance in tardigrades. Eur J Entomol 93(3):349–357Google Scholar
- Tanaka M, Earl AM, Howell HA, Park MJ, Eisen JA, Peterson SN, Battista JR (2004) Analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans’s transcriptional response to ionizing radiation and desiccation reveals novel proteins that contribute to extreme radioresistance. Genetics 168:21–33. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.029249 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar