Extremophiles

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 665–676 | Cite as

Bacterial diversity of extremely alkaline bauxite residue site of alumina industrial plant using culturable bacteria and residue 16S rRNA gene clones

  • Pankaj Krishna
  • A. Giridhar Babu
  • M. Sudhakara Reddy
Original Paper

Abstract

Bauxite residue (red mud), generated during the extraction of alumina from bauxite ore is characterized by high pH, high concentrations of soluble ions with low or virtually no organic matter. These extreme conditions along with numerous nutrient deficiencies, limit the microbial growth and vegetation establishment. In the present study, diversity of both cultivable and non-cultivable bacteria present in the red mud was investigated by 16S rDNA sequence analyses. The cultivable bacteria were identified as Agromyces indicus, Bacillus litoralis, B. anthracis, Chungangia koreensis, Kokuria flava, K. polaris, Microbacterium hominis, Planococcus plakortidis, Pseudomonas alcaliphila and Salinococcus roseus based on their 16S rDNA sequence analysis. These isolates were alkali tolerant, positive for one or more of the enzyme activities tested, able to produce organic acids and oxidize wide range of carbon substrates. For non-cultivable diversity of bacteria, DNA was extracted from the bauxite residue samples and 16S rDNA clone library was constructed. The 16S rDNA clones of this study showed affiliation to three major phyla predominant being betaproteobacteria (41.1 %) followed by gammaproteobacteria (37.5 %) and bacteroidetes (21.4 %). We are reporting for the first time about the bacterial diversity of this unique and extreme environment.

Keywords

Red mud Clone library 16S rRNA Planococcus Pseudomonas Bacillus 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Department of Biotechnology (DBT), GoI, for their financial support to this project (BT/PR-4697/BCE/08/327/2004). The authors are thankful to Mr. S. K. Patnaik, NALCO, Damjodi for his help while collecting the samples and also to TIFAC-CORE, Thapar University, Patiala for providing lab facilities.

References

  1. Achal V, Pan X, Zhang D (2011) Remediation of copper-contaminated soil by Kocuria flava CR1, based on microbially induced calcite precipitation. Ecol Eng 37:1601–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aichberger K, Eibelhuber A, Hofer G (1986) In: Gomez et al (eds) Sampling problems for the chemical analysis of sludge, soils and plants. Elsevier Science, New York, pp 38–44Google Scholar
  3. Amoozegar MA, Ashengropha M, Malekzadeha F, Razavib MR, Naddafb S, Kabiria M (2008) Isolation and initial characterization of the tellurite reducing moderately halophilic bacterium, Salinicoccus sp. strain QW6. Microbiol Res 163:456–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babu GA, Reddy MS (2011) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and nutrient status of bermudagrass grown in alkaline bauxite processing residue. Environ Pollut 159:25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey P, Markovic O, Mislovicova D (1985) Sensitive detection of endo-1,4-β-glucanases and endo-1,4-β-xylanases in gels. Anal Biochem 144:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banning NC, Phillips IR, Jones DL, Murphy DV (2010) Development of microbial diversity and functional potential in bauxite residue sand under rehabilitation. Restor Ecol 17:350–358Google Scholar
  7. Barrow GI, Feltham RKA (1993) Cowan and steel’s manual for the identification of medical bacteria, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dastager SG, Damare S (2013) Marine actinobacteria showing phosphate-solubilizing efficiency in Chorao Island, Goa, India. Curr Microbiol 66:421–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duckworth AW, Grant WD, Jones BE, Steenbergen RV (1996) Phylogenetic diversity of soda lake alkaliphiles. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 19:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friesl W, Horak O, Wenze W (2004) Immobilization of heavy metals in soil by the application of bauxite residues: pot experiments under field conditions. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 167:54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gadd GM, Griffiths AJ (1977) Microorganisms and heavy metal toxicity. Microb Ecol 4:303–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Good IJ (1953) The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 40:237–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graefe M, Klauber C (2011) Bauxite residue issues: IV. Old obstacles and new pathways for in situ residue bioremediation. Hydrometallurgy 108:46–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamdy MK, Williams FS (2001) Bacterial amelioration of bauxite residue waste of industrial alumina plants. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 27:228–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris J (2009) Soil microbial communities and restoration ecology: facilitators or followers? Science 325:573–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill TCJ, Walsh K, Harris JA, Moffett BF (2003) Using ecological diversity measures with bacterial communities. FEMS Microbial Ecol 43:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holland SM (2003) Analytical rarefaction 1.3 program. University of Georgia, Athens. http://www.uga.edu/*strata/software/
  18. Horikoshi K (1999) Akaliphiles: some applications of their products for biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:735–750PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones BEH, Haynes RJ (2011) Bauxite processing residue: a critical review of its formation, properties, storage, and revegetation. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41:271–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joshi AA, Kanekar PP, Kelkar AS, Shouche YS, Vani AA, Borgave SB, Sarnaik SS (2008) Cultivable bacterial diversity of alkaline Lonar Lake, India. Microb Ecol 55:163–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaur I, Das AP, Acharya M, Sree A, Mayliraj S (2012) Planococcus plakortidis sp. nov., isolated from the marine sponge Plakortis simplex (Schulze). Int J Sys Evol Microbiol 62:883–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH (2012a) Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Micr 62:716–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim W, Traiwan J, Park MH, Jung MY, Oh SJ, Yoon JH, Sukhoom A (2012b) Chungangia koreensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Int J Sys Evol Microbiol 62:1914–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krishna P, Arora A, Reddy MS (2008) An alkaliphilic and xylanolytic strain of actinomycetes Kocuria sp. RM1 isolated from extremely alkaline bauxite residue sites. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:3079–3085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lepere C, Demura M, Kawachi M, Romac S, Probert I, Vaulot D (2011) Whole-genome amplification (WGA) of marine photosynthetic eukaryote populations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 76:513–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mau MK (1997) 16S rDNA-sequenzanalyse und sondendesign zur charakterisierung der bakterienpopulation im sediment eines hochbelasteten gewässers. Doctoral Thesis, Technische Universität BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  27. McGarity JW, Myers MG (1967) A survey of urease activity in soils of northern New South Wales. Plant Soil 27:217–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nies DH (2000) Heavy metal resistant bacteria as extremophiles: molecular physiology and biotechnological use of Ralstonia sp. CH34. Extremophiles 4:77–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Snars K, Hughes JC, Gilkes RJ (2004) The effects of addition of bauxite red mud to soil on P uptake by plants. Aust J Agri Res 55:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stackebrandt E, Liesack W, Goebel BM (1993) Bacterial diversity in a soil sample from a subtropical Australian environment as determined by SSU rDNA analysis. FASEB J 7:232–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tabatabai MA (1982) Soil enzymes. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, microbiological and biological properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 903–947Google Scholar
  33. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-Nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tiago I, Chun AP, Verissimo A (2004) Bacterial diversity in a nonsaline alkaline environment: heterotrophic aerobic populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:7378–7387PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wehr JB, Fulton I, Menzies NW (2006) Revegetation strategies for bauxite refinery residue: a case study of Alcan Gove in Northern Territory, Australia. Environ Manag 37:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang C, Niu Y, Su H, Wang Z, Tao F, Wang X, Tang H, Ma C, Xu P (2010) A novel microbial habitat of alkaline black liquor with very high pollution load: microbial diversity and the key members in application potentials. Bioresource Technol 101:1737–1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yoon JH, Oh TK (2005) Bacillus litoralis sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat of the Yellow Sea in Korea. Int J Sys Evol Microbiol 55:1945–1948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yumoto I, Yamazaki K, Hishinuma M, Nodasaka Y, Suemori A, Nakajima K, Inoue N, Kawasaki K (2001) Pseudomonas alcaliphila sp. nov., a novel facultatively psychrophilic alkaliphile isolated from seawater. Int J Sys Evol Microbiol 51:349–355Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pankaj Krishna
    • 1
  • A. Giridhar Babu
    • 1
  • M. Sudhakara Reddy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations