Advertisement

Extremophiles

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 763–768 | Cite as

Selection of a cold-adapted bacterium for bioremediation of wastewater at low temperatures

  • Emmanuelle Gratia
  • Frédéric Weekers
  • Rosa Margesin
  • Salvino D’Amico
  • Philippe Thonart
  • Georges FellerEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Amongst more than 1000 isolates collected in various cold environments, the strain Arthrobacter psychrolactophilus Sp 31.3 has been selected for its ability to grow and to produce exoenzymes at low temperatures, its inability to grow at 37°C, its non-halophilic character and its growth versatility on various media. This non-pathogenic strain displays a strong resistance to desiccation and storage at room temperature and is suitable for the production of freeze-dried bacterial starters. When grown in a synthetic wastewater at 10°C, the strain induces a complete clarification of the turbid medium and efficiently hydrolyses proteins, starch and lipids in the broth. Furthermore, this strain has a remarkable capacity to improve the biodegradability of organic compounds in wastewater as indicated by a BOD5/COD ratio of 0.7.

Keywords

Psychrophiles Bioremediation Wastewater Arthrobacter Macromolecular degradation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Région Wallonne, Belgium (First Europe contract Biorem) and by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS, Belgium (FRFC grants). The facilities offered by the Institut Polaire Français are also acknowledged. We thank S. Shivaji (Hyderabad, India) for providing the CMS strains. SD’A was a FNRS post-doctoral researcher.

References

  1. Aislabie J, Saul DJ, Foght JM (2006) Bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated polar soils. Extremophiles 10:171–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazot S, Bois P, Joyeux C, Lebeau T (2007) Mineralization of diuron [3-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea] by co-immobilized Arthrobacter sp. and Delftia acidovorans. Biotechnol Lett 29:749–754PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernfeld P (1955) Amylases, α and β. Methods Enzymol 1:149–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlone GM, Valadez MJ, Pickett MJ (1982) Methods for distinguishing gram-positive from gram-negative bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 16:1157–1159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Amico S, Collins T, Marx JC, Feller G, Gerday C (2006) Psychrophilic microorganisms: challenges for life. EMBO Rep 7:385–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daims H, Taylor MW, Wagner M (2006) Wastewater treatment: a model system for microbial ecology. Trends Biotechnol 24:483–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El Fantroussi S, Agathos SN (2005) Is bioaugmentation a feasible strategy for pollutant removal and site remediation? Curr Opin Microbiol 8:268–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feller G, Gerday C (2003) Psychrophilic enzymes: hot topics in cold adaptation. Nat Rev Microbiol 1:200–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jorgensen KS (2007) In situ bioremediation. Adv Appl Microbiol 61:285–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Margesin R, Schinner F (1998) Low-temperature bioremediation of a waste water contaminated with anionic surfactants and fuel oil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 49:482–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Margesin R, Schinner F (1999) Biotechnological applications of cold-adapted organisms. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  12. Margesin R, Schinner F (2001) Biodegradation and bioremediation of hydrocarbons in extreme environments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:650–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Margesin R, Feller G, Gerday C, Russell NJ (2002) Cold-adapted microorganisms: adaptation strategies and biotechnological potential. In: Bitton G (ed) Encyclopedia of environmental microbiology, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 871–885Google Scholar
  14. Mongodin EF, Shapir N, Daugherty SC, DeBoy RT, Emerson JB, Shvartzbeyn A, Radune D, Vamathevan J, Riggs F, Grinberg V, Khouri H, Wackett LP, Nelson KE, Sadowsky MJ (2006) Secrets of soil survival revealed by the genome sequence of Arthrobacter aurescens TC1. PLoS Genet 2:e214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schatz A, Bovell C Jr (1952) Growth and hydrogenase activity of a new bacterium, Hydrogenomonas facilis. J Bacteriol 63:87–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sharma NK, Pandey J, Gupta N, Jain RK (2007) Growth and physiological response of Arthrobacter protophormiae RKJ100 toward higher concentrations of o-nitrobenzoate and p-hydroxybenzoate. FEMS Microbiol Lett 271:65–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Singer AC, van der Gast CJ, Thompson IP (2005) Perspectives and vision for strain selection in bioaugmentation. Trends Biotechnol 23:74–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Spies JR (1957) Colorimetric procedures for amino acids. Methods Enzymol 3:467–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van Veen JA, van Overbeek LS, van Elsas JD (1997) Fate and activity of microorganisms introduced into soil. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:121–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Vogel TM (1996) Bioaugmentation as a soil bioremediation approach. Curr Opin Biotechnol 7:311–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang X, Liu X, Wang H, Dong Q (2007) Utilization and degradation of imazaquin by a naturally occurring isolate of Arthrobacter crystallopoietes. Chemosphere 67:2156–2162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuelle Gratia
    • 1
  • Frédéric Weekers
    • 2
  • Rosa Margesin
    • 3
  • Salvino D’Amico
    • 1
  • Philippe Thonart
    • 4
  • Georges Feller
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratory of BiochemistryUniversity of LiègeLiège-Sart TilmanBelgium
  2. 2.GemblouxBelgium
  3. 3.Institut für MikrobiologieUniversität InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  4. 4.Walloon Centre of Industrial BiologyUniversity of LiègeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations