Extremophiles

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 211–216 | Cite as

Life at low temperatures: is disorder the driving force?

Review

Abstract

The thermodynamic characterization of various biological systems from psychrophiles points to a larger entropic contribution when compared to the corresponding mesophilic or (hyper) thermophilic counterparts, either at the level of the macromolecules (thermodynamic and kinetic stabilities) or of their function (ligand binding, catalytic activity). It is suggested here that in an environment characterized by a low heat content (enthalpy) and at temperatures that strongly slowdown molecular motions, the cold-adapted biological systems rely on a larger disorder to maintain macromolecular dynamics and function. Such pre-eminent involvement of entropy is observed in the experimental results and, from a macroscopic point of view, is also reflected for instance by the steric hindrances introduced by cis-unsaturated and branched lipids to maintain membrane fluidity, by the loose conformation of psychrophilic proteins or by the local destabilization of tRNA by dihydrouridine in psychrophilic bacteria.

Keywords

Psychrophiles Proteins Stability Ligand binding Entropy 

References

  1. Becktel WJ, Schellman JA (1987) Protein stability curves. Biopolymers 26:1859–1877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collins T, Meuwis MA, Gerday C, Feller G (2003) Activity, stability and flexibility in glycosidases adapted to extreme thermal environments. J Mol Biol 328:419–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dalluge JJ, Hamamoto T, Horikoshi K, Morita RY, Stetter KO, McCloskey JA (1997) Posttranscriptional modification of tRNA in psychrophilic bacteria. J Bacteriol 179:1918–1923PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. D’Amico S, Gerday C, Feller G (2001) Structural determinants of cold adaptation and stability in a large protein. J Biol Chem 276:25791–25796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Amico S, Marx JC, Gerday C, Feller G (2003) Activity–stability relationships in extremophilic enzymes. J Biol Chem 278:7891–7896PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Amico S, Sohier JS, Feller G (2006a) Kinetics and energetics of ligand binding determined by microcalorimetry: insights into active site mobility in a psychrophilic alpha-amylase. J Mol Biol 358:1296–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Amico S, Collins T, Marx JC, Feller G, Gerday C (2006b) Psychrophilic microorganisms: challenges for life. EMBO Rep 7:385–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feller G, Gerday C (2003a) Catalysis and low temperatures: molecular adaptations. In: Gerday C, Glansdorff N (eds) Extremophiles (Life under extreme environmental Condition), Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO. Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK. http://www.eolss.net
  9. Feller G, Gerday C (2003b) Psychrophilic enzymes: hot topics in cold adaptation. Nat Rev Microbiol 1:200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feller G, d’Amico D, Gerday C (1999) Thermodynamic stability of a cold-active α-amylase from the Antarctic bacterium Alteromonas haloplanctis. Biochemistry 38:4613–4619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fields PA, Somero GN (1998) Hot spots in cold adaptation: localized increases in conformational flexibility in lactate dehydrogenase A(4) orthologs of Antarctic notothenioid fishes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:11476–11481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galtier N, Lobry JR (1997) Relationships between genomic G + C content, RNA secondary structures, and optimal growth temperature in prokaryotes. J Mol Evol 44:632–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Georlette D, Damien B, Blaise V, Depiereux E, Uversky VN, Gerday C, Feller G (2003) Structural and functional adaptations to extreme temperatures in psychrophilic, mesophilic, and thermophilic DNA ligases. J Biol Chem 278:37015–37023PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khachane AN, Timmis KN, dos Santos VA (2005) Uracil content of 16S rRNA of thermophilic and psychrophilic prokaryotes correlates inversely with their optimal growth temperatures. Nucleic Acids Res 33:4016–4022PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kohen A, Cannio R, Bartolucci S, Klinman JP (1999) Enzyme dynamics and hydrogen tunnelling in a thermophilic alcohol dehydrogenase. Nature 399:496–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar S, Nussinov R (2004) Experiment-guided thermodynamic simulations on reversible two-state proteins: implications for protein thermostability. Biophys Chem 111:235–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar S, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R (2001) Thermodynamic differences among homologous thermophilic and mesophilic proteins. Biochemistry 40:14152–14165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar S, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R (2002) Maximal stabilities of reversible two-state proteins. Biochemistry 41:5359–5374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar S, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R (2003) Temperature range of thermodynamic stability for the native state of reversible two-state proteins. Biochemistry 42:4864–4873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lonhienne T, Gerday C, Feller G (2000) Psychrophilic enzymes: revisiting the thermodynamic parameters of activation may explain local flexibility. Biochim Biophys Acta 1543:1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Makhatadze GI, Privalov PL (1995) Energetics of protein structure. Adv Protein Chem 47:307–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Margesin R, Feller G, Gerday C, Russell NJ (2002) Cold-adapted microorganisms: adaptation strategies and biotechnological potential. In: Bitton G (eds) Encyclopedia of Environmental Microbiology (2). Wiley, New York, pp 871–885Google Scholar
  23. Privalov PL (1979) Stability of proteins: small globular proteins. Adv Protein Chem 33:167–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Privalov PL (1990) Cold denaturation of proteins. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 25:281–305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Russell NJ (1997) Psychrophilic bacteria: molecular adaptations of membrane lipids. Comp Biochem Physiol A 118:489–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Russell NJ (2003) Psychrophily and resistance to low temperature. In: Gerday C, Glansdorff N (eds) Extremophiles (Life under extreme environmental Condition), Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO. Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK. http://www.eolss.net
  27. Russell NJ, Hamamoto T (1998) Psychrophiles. In: Horikoshi K, Grant D (eds) Extremophiles: microbial life in extreme environments. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 25–45Google Scholar
  28. Shlyk-Kerner O, Samish I, Kaftan D, Holland N, Maruthi Sai PS, Kless H, Scherz A (2006) Protein flexibility acclimatizes photosynthetic energy conversion to the ambient temperature. Nature 442:827–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Siddiqui KS, Cavicchioli R (2006) Cold-adapted enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem 75:403–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smalås AO, Leiros HK, Os V, Willassen NP (2000) Cold adapted enzymes. Biotechnol Annu Rev 6:1–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tehei M, Franzetti B, Madern D, Ginzburg M, Ginzburg BZ, Giudici-Orticoni MT, Bruschi M, Zaccai G (2004) Adaptation to extreme environments: macromolecular dynamics in bacteria compared in vivo by neutron scattering. EMBO Rep 5:66–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zavodszky P, Kardos J, Svingor, Petsko GA (1998) Adjustment of conformational flexibility is a key event in the thermal adaptation of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:7406–7411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of BiochemistryUniversity of Liège, Institute of Chemistry B6aTilmanBelgium

Personalised recommendations