, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 279–284 | Cite as

Systematic analysis of HSP gene expression and effects on cell growth and survival at high hydrostatic pressure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • Takeshi Miura
  • Hiroaki Minegishi
  • Ron Usami
  • Fumiyoshi Abe
Original Paper


We systematically investigated the role of HSP genes in the growth and survival of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under high hydrostatic pressure together with analysis of pressure-regulated gene expression. Cells of strain BY4742 were capable of growth at moderate pressure of 25 MPa. When pressure of 25 MPa was applied to the cells, the expression of HSP78, HSP104, and HSP10 was upregulated by about 3- to 4-fold, and that of HSP32, HSP42, and HSP82 was upregulated by about 2- to 2.6-fold. However, the loss of one of the six genes did not markedly affect growth at 25 MPa, while the loss of HSP31 impaired high-pressure growth. These results suggest that Hsp31 plays a role in high-pressure growth but that the six upregulated genes do not. Extremely high pressure of 125 MPa decreased the viability of the wild-type cells to 1% of the control level. Notably, the loss of HSP genes other than HSP31 enhanced the survival rate by about fivefold at 125 MPa, suggesting that the cellular defensive system against high pressure could be strengthened upon the loss of the HSP genes. In this paper, we describe the requirement for and significance of a subset of HSP genes in yeast cell growth at moderate pressure and survival at extremely high pressure.


High hydrostatic pressure Heat-shock proteins Piezoadaptation Piezotolerance Piezophysiology Saccharomyces cerevisiae 


  1. Abe F, Horikoshi K (1997) Vacuolar acidification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae induced by elevated hydrostatic pressure is transient and is mediated by vacuolar H+-ATPase. Extremophiles 1:89–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abe F, Horikoshi K (1998) Analysis of intracellular pH in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae under elevated hydrostatic pressure: a study in baro-(piezo-)physiology. Extremophiles 2:223–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Abe F, Horikoshi K (2000) Tryptophan permease gene TAT2 confers high-pressure growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 20:8093–8102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abe F, Iida H (2003) Pressure-induced differential regulation of the two tryptophan permeases Tat1 and Tat2 by ubiquitin ligase Rsp5 and its binding proteins, Bul1 and Bul2. Mol Cell Biol 23:7566–7584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abe F (2004) Piezophysiology of yeast: occurrence and significance. Cell Mol Biol 50:437–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP (2003) A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19:185–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Causton HC, Ren B, Koh SS, Harbison CT, Kanin E, Jennings EG, Lee TI, True HL, Lander ES, Young RA (2001) Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 12:323–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Craig EA, Jacobsen K (1984) Mutations of the heat inducible 70 kilodalton genes of yeast confer temperature sensitive growth. Cell 38:841–849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig EA, Gross CA (1991) Is hsp70 the cellular thermometer? Trends Biochem Sci 16:135–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. de Nobel H, Lawrie L, Brul S, Klis F, Davis M, Alloush H, Coote P (2001) Parallel and comparative analysis of the proteome and transcriptome of sorbic acid-stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 18:1413–1428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dubaquie Y, Looser R, Rospert S (1997) Significance of chaperonin 10-mediated inhibition of ATP hydrolysis by chaperonin 60. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9011–9016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Erkine AM, Magrogan SF, Sekinger EA, Gross DS (1999) Cooperative binding of heat shock factor to the yeast HSP82 promoter in vivo and in vitro. Mol Cell Biol 19:1627–1639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferguson SB, Anderson ES, Harshaw RB, Thate T, Craig NL, Nelson HC (2005) Protein kinase A regulates constitutive expression of small heat-shock genes in an Msn2/4p-independent and Hsf1p-dependent manner in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 169:1203–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandes PM, Domitrovic T, Kao CM, Kurtenbach E (2004) Genomic expression pattern in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in response to high hydrostatic pressure. FEBS Lett 556:153–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Glover JR, Lindquist S (1998) Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40: a novel chaperone system that rescues previously aggregated proteins. Cell 94:73–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gottesman S, Squires C, Pichersky E, Carrington M, Hobbs M, Mattick JS, Dalrymple B, Kuramitsu H, Shiroza T, Foster T et al. (1990) Conservation of the regulatory subunit for the Clp ATP-dependent protease in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:3513–3517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graille M, Quevillon-Cheruel S, Leulliot N, Zhou CZ, de la Sierra Gallay IL, Jacquamet L, Ferrer JL, Liger D, Poupon A, Janin J, van Tilbeurgh H (2004) Crystal structure of the YDR533c S. cerevisiae protein, a class II member of the Hsp31 family. Structure 12:839–847CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Haslbeck M, Braun N, Stromer T, Richter B, Model N, Weinkauf S, Buchner J (2004) Hsp42 is the general small heat shock protein in the cytosol of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 23:638–649CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Iwahashi H, Kaul SC, Obuchi K, Komatsu Y (1991) Induction of barotolerance by heat shock treatment in yeast. FEMS Microbiol Lett 64:325–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Iwahashi H, Obuchi K, Fujii S, Komatsu Y (1997) Effect of temperature on the role of Hsp104 and trehalose in barotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 416:1–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Iwahashi H, Shimizu H, Odani M, Komatsu Y (2003) Piezophysiology of genome wide gene expression levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Extremophiles 7:291–298. Erratum in: Extremophiles (2003) 7:433Google Scholar
  22. Iwahashi H, Odani M, Ishidou E, Kitagawa E (2005) Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high hydrostatic pressure causing growth inhibition. FEBS Lett 579:2847–2852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kohrer K, Domdey H (1991) Preparation of high molecular weight RNA. In: Guthrie C, Fink G (eds) Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology. Academic, San Diego, pp 398–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leonhardt SA, Fearson K, Danese PN, Mason TL (1993) HSP78 encodes a yeast mitochondrial heat shock protein in the Clp family of ATP-dependent proteases. Mol Cell Biol 13:6304–6313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindquist S, Craig EA (1988) The heat-shock proteins. Annu Rev Genet 22:631–677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Louvion JF, Abbas-Terki T, Picard D (1998) Hsp90 is required for pheromone signaling in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 9:3071–3083PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mager WH, De Kruijff AJ (1995) Stress-induced transcriptional activation. Microbiol Rev 59:506–531PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Malki A, Caldas T, Abdallah J, Kern R, Eckey V, Kim SJ, Cha SS, Mori H, Richarme G (2005) Peptidase activity of the Escherichia coli Hsp31 chaperone. J Biol Chem 280:14420–14426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Matsumoto R, Akama K, Rakwal R, Iwahashi H (2005) The stress response against denatured proteins in the deletion of cytosolic chaperones SSA1/2 is different from heat-shock response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 6:141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Miura T, Abe F (2004) Multiple ubiquitin-specific protease genes are involved in degradation of yeast tryptophan permease Tat2 at high pressure. FEMS Microbiol Lett 239:171–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Moriya H, Isono K (1999) Analysis of genetic interactions between DHH1, SSD1 and ELM1 indicates their involvement in cellular morphology determination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15:481–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nagayama A, Kato C, Abe F (2004) The C-terminal mutation stabilizes the yeast tryptophan permease Tat2 under high-pressure and low-temperature conditions. Extremophiles 8:143–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Piper PW (1995) The heat shock and ethanol stress responses of yeast exhibit extensive similarity and functional overlap. FEMS Microbiol Lett 134:121–127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Piper PW, Ortiz-Calderon C, Holyoak C, Coote P, Cole M (1997) Hsp30, the integral plasma membrane heat shock protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is a stress-inducible regulator of plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase. Cell Stress Chaperones 2:12–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Seymour IJ, Piper PW (1999) Stress induction of HSP30, the plasma membrane heat shock protein gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, appears not to use known stress-regulated transcription factors. Microbiology 145:231–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsuchiya E, Matsuzaki G, Kurano K, Fukuchi T, Tsukao A, Miyakawa T (1996) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SSD1 gene is involved in the tolerance to high concentration of Ca2+ with the participation of HST1/NRC1/BFR1. Gene 176:35–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Uesono Y, Fujita A, Toh-e A, Kikuchi Y (1994) The MCS1/SSD1/SRK1/SSL1 gene is involved in stable maintenance of the chromosome in yeast. Gene 143:135–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takeshi Miura
    • 1
  • Hiroaki Minegishi
    • 2
  • Ron Usami
    • 2
  • Fumiyoshi Abe
    • 1
  1. 1.Extremobiosphere Research CenterJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)Yokosuka 237-0061Japan
  2. 2.Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of EngineeringToyo UniversityKawagoe 350-0815Japan

Personalised recommendations