Risk factors for psychological functioning in German adolescents with gender dysphoria: poor peer relations and general family functioning
- 22 Downloads
Adolescents with gender dysphoria (GD) often face various associated social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties. In such a marginalized group, it is crucial to identify factors that may impact psychological functioning to better accommodate their needs. Therefore, the present study investigated the impact of two specific risk factors, poor peer relations and general family functioning, on the development of psychological problems in adolescents with GD, and their possible interaction effect. The Youth Self-Report, a Peer Relations Scale, and a General Family Functioning scale were assessed in a sample of n = 180 clinically referred adolescents (mean age 15.5; 146 transgender boys with a female birth-assigned sex, and 34 transgender girls with a male birth-assigned sex) with a complete GD diagnosis (fulfillment of the DSM 5 criteria A and B) at their initial admission to the Hamburg Gender Identity Service. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between peer relations, family functioning, and psychological functioning outcomes. Adolescents with GD presented significantly higher Internalizing and Total Problem scores compared to the German reference norm. Externalizing problems were above the norm for transgender boys, but within the normal range for transgender girls. Multiple regression analysis revealed that, overall, adolescents with an advanced age, a female birth-assigned sex, poorer peer relations, and poorer family functioning showed more behavioral and emotional problems. Consequently, incorporating both the family and social environment in transgender care is of high importance to adequately tend to the needs of adolescents with GD.
KeywordsGender dysphoria Transgender Adolescents Mental health Psychological functioning Psychosocial functioning Family functioning Peer relations Social support
We thank all the participants who contributed to this study by providing important personal data on many levels, and the clinicians for their contribution to the data collection in the care unit, especially Saskia Fahrenkrug.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards statement
All human and animal studies have been approved by the appropriate local ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
- 2.American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric PubGoogle Scholar
- 3.Becker I, Gjergji-Lama V, Romer G, Möller B (2014) Merkmale von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Geschlechtsdysphorie in der Hamburger Spezialsprechstunde. [Characteristics of Children and Adolescents with Gender Dysphoria Referred to the Hamburg Gender Identity Clinic.] Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr 63:486–509. https://doi.org/10.13109/prkk.2014.63.6.486
- 4.de Graaf NM, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Carmichael P, et al (2017) Psychological functioning in adolescents referred to specialist gender identity clinics across Europe: a clinical comparison study between four clinics. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-1098-4
- 5.de Vries ALC, de Steensma TD, de Cohen-Kettenis PT et al (2016) Poor peer relations predict parent- and self-reported behavioral and emotional problems of adolescents with gender dysphoria: a cross-national, cross-clinic comparative analysis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 25:579–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-015-0764-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Shiffman M, VanderLaan DP, Wood H et al (2016) Behavioral and emotional problems as a function of peer relationships in adolescents with gender dysphoria: A comparison with clinical and nonclinical controls. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers 3:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Steensma TD, Zucker KJ, Kreukels BPC et al (2014) Behavioral and emotional problems on the teacher’s report form: A cross-national, cross-clinic comparative analysis of gender dysphoric children and adolescents. J Abnorm Child Psychol 42:635–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9804-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Clark BA, Veale JF, Townsend M, et al (2018) Non-binary youth: Access to gender-affirming primary health care. Int J Transgenderism 0:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2017.1394954
- 27.Masten AS, Cutuli JJ, Herbers JE, Gabrielle-Reed MJ (2009) Resilience in development. Handb Posit Psychol 117–131Google Scholar
- 30.Wille N, Bettge S, Ravens-Sieberer U, BELLA study group (2008) Risk and protective factors for children’s and adolescents’ mental health: results of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 17 Suppl 1:133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-008-1015-y
- 31.Rubin KH, Bukowski WM, Laursen B (2009) Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. Guilford Press, New York, NY, USGoogle Scholar
- 36.Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS (1983) The McMaster family assessment device. J Marital Fam Ther 9:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01497.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Winkler J, Stolzenberg H (1999) Der sozialschichtindex im bundes-gesundheits survey [Social class index in the Federal health survey]. Gesundheitswesen 61:178–183Google Scholar
- 43.Achenbach TM (1991) Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile. University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, Dept. of PsychiatryGoogle Scholar
- 44.Döpfner, M., Plück, J., Bölte, S., et al (1998) Fragebogen für Jugendliche; deutsche Bearbeitung der Youth Self-Report Form der Child Behavior Checklist (YSR). Einführung und Anleitung zur Handauswertung mit deutschen Normen: Arbeitsgruppe Deutsche Child Behavior Checklist. [Questionnaire for Adolescents; German Version of the Youth Self Report Form of the Child Behavior Checklist (YSR). Introduction and Manual for the Evaluation using German norm data: Work Group of the German Child Bheavior Checklist.] Arbeitsgruppe Kinder-, Jugend- und Familiendiagnostik (KJFD), KölnGoogle Scholar
- 45.Döpfner M, Berner W, Lehmkuhl G (1995) Reliabilität und faktorielle Validität des Youth Self-Report der Child Behavior Checklist bei einer klinischen Stichprobe. [Reliability and factorial validity of the Youth Self-Report of the Child Behavior Checklist in a clinical sample.] Diagnostica 41:221–244Google Scholar
- 47.Little RJA, Rubin DB (2014) Statistical analysis with missing data. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
- 48.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- 50.Röder M, Barkmann C, Richter-Appelt H, et al (2018) Health-related quality of life in transgender adolescents: Associations with body image and emotional and behavioral problems. Int J Transgenderism 0:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2018.1425649
- 56.Schneider C, Cerwenka S, Nieder TO et al (2016) Measuring gender dysphoria: A multicenter examination and comparison of the utrecht gender dysphoria scale and the gender identity/gender dysphoria questionnaire for adolescents and adults. Arch Sex Behav 45:551–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0702-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar