Emotional valence detection in adolescents with oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder or autism spectrum disorder
- 180 Downloads
Oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder (ODD/CD), and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) share poor empathic functioning and have been associated with impaired emotional processing. However, no previous studies directly compared similarities and differences in these processes for the two disorders. A two-choice emotional valence detection task requiring differentiation between positive, negative, and neutral IAPS pictures was administered to 52 adolescents (12–19 years) with ODD/CD, 52 with ASD and 24 typically developing individuals (TDI). Callous–unemotional (CU) traits were assessed by self- and parent reports using the Inventory of callous–unemotional traits. Main findings were that adolescents with ODD/CD or ASD both performed poorer than TDI in terms of accuracy, yet only the TDI—not both clinical groups—had relatively most difficulty in discriminating between positive versus neutral pictures compared to neutral–negative or positive–negative contrasts. Poorer performance was related to a higher level of CU traits. The results of the current study suggest youth with ODD/CD or ASD have a diminished ability to detect emotional valence which is not limited to facial expressions and is related to a higher level of CU traits. More specifically, youth with ODD/CD or ASD seem to have a reduced processing of positive stimuli and/or lack a ‘positive perception bias’ present in TDI that could either contribute to the symptoms and/or be a result of having the disorder and may contribute to the comorbidity of both disorders.
KeywordsEmotional valence detection task Conduct disorder Oppositional defiant disorder Autism spectrum disorder Callous–unemotional traits
This study was supported by Karakter Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Center. The study is further supported by the European Union 7th Framework programs AGGRESSOTYPE (602805) and MATRICS (603016) and by an NWO Brain and Cognition Grant (056-24-011). We are grateful to participating families.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
In the past 3 years, Dr. Buitelaar has been a consultant to/member of advisory board of/and/or speaker for Janssen Cilag BV, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myer Squibb, Shering Plough, UCB, Shire, Novartis, and Servier. He is not an employee of any of these companies, and not a stock shareholder of any of these companies. He has no other financial or material support, including expert testimony, patents, and royalties. Drs. Herpers, Bakker, Greven, Wiegers, Nijhof, Baanders, and Rommelse declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was approved by the Dutch Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects, protocol number NL26773.000.09 (Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek; CCMO). As such, all procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants, and their parents, included in the study.
- 8.Jayaro C, de la Vega I, Diaz-Marsa M, Montes A, Carrasco JL (2008) The use of the international affective picture system for the study of affective dysregulation in mental disorders. Actas Esp Psiquiatr 36:177–182Google Scholar
- 12.Alloy LB, Abramson LY, Walshaw PD, Cogswell A, Grandin LD, Hughes ME, Iacoviello BM, Whitehouse WG, Urosevic S, Nusslock R, Hogan ME (2008) Behavioral approach system and behavioral inhibition system sensitivities and bipolar spectrum disorders: prospective prediction of bipolar mood episodes. Bipolar Disord 10:310–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Biederman J, Faraone SV, Milberger S, Jetton JG, Chen L, Mick E, Greene RW, Russell RL (1996) Is childhood oppositional defiant disorder a precursor to adolescent conduct disorder? Findings from a four-year follow-up study of children with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 35:1193–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Burke JD, Hipwell AE, Loeber R (2010) Dimensions of oppositional defiant disorder as predictors of depression and conduct disorder in preadolescent girls. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 49:484–492Google Scholar
- 37.Association AP (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 41.Wechsler D (1991) Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—third edition (WISC-III). The Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- 42.Groth-Marnat G (1997) Handbook of psychological assessment. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 43.Wechsler D (1997) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—third edition (WAIS-III). Administration and scoring manual. The Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- 44.Brand N, Von Borries K, Bulten E (2010) Progress with MINDS, a testmanager for psychological assessment, research and education: applications in the forensic psychiatric domain. In: Spink AJ, Grieco F, Krips OE, Loyens LWS, Noldus PJJ, Zimmerman PH (eds) Proceedings of Measuring Behavior 2010. Eindhoven, p 396–398Google Scholar
- 45.Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (1997) International affective picture system (IAPS). NIMH Center for Emotion and Attention, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 46.Brand N, Groot P (2007) Test manager mental information processing and neuropsychological diagnostic system (MINDS). In: Klinische and Gezondheids Psychologie van de Faculteit Sociale Wetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht., UtrechtGoogle Scholar
- 50.Rutter M, Bailey A, Lord C (2003) Social communication questionnaire (SCQ). Western Psychological Services, TorranceGoogle Scholar
- 76.Pishyareh E, Tehrani-Doost M, Mahmoodi-Gharaie J, Khorrami A, Rahmdar SR (2015) A comparative study of sustained attentional bias on emotional processing in ADHD children to pictures with eye-tracking. Iran J Child Neurol 9:64–70Google Scholar