Risk and protective factors for mental health at a youth mass gathering
Mass gatherings are well-documented for their public health risks; however, little research has examined their impact on mental health or focused on young people specifically. This study explores risk and protective factors for mental health at mass gatherings, with a particular focus on characterising attendees with high levels of psychological distress and risk taking.
Data collection was conducted in situ at “Schoolies”, an annual informal week-long mass gathering of approximately 30,000 Australian school leavers. Participants were 812 attendees of Schoolies on the Gold Coast in 2015 or 2016 (74% aged 17 years old).
In both years, attendee mental health was found to be significantly better than population norms for their age peers. Identification with the mass gathering predicted better mental health, and this relationship became stronger across the course of the mass gathering. Attendees with high levels of psychological distress were more likely to be male, socially isolated, impulsive, and in a friendship group where risk taking was normative.
Mass gatherings may have a net benefit for attendee mental health, especially for those attendees who are subjectively committed to the event. However, a vulnerable subgroup of attendees requires targeted mental health support.
KeywordsSocial identity Well-being Mass gathering medicine Special events Health risk behaviour
This Project was funded by the Australian Research Council (DE160100592) and the Safer Schoolies Initiative, Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services, Queensland Government. We wish to thank Melissa Chang, Tom Curro, Joanne Rathbone, Harrison Lee, Andrew Morgan, Alicia Federico, Anna Rogash, Jenna Laroque, Josh Santin, Nick Wheeler, Petra Harman-Schufft, Sienna Hinton, Taylor Alati, and Zoe Weller for their assistance with data collection and entry.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Khan K, Sears J, Hu VW, Brownstein JS, Hay S, Kossowsky D, Eckhardt R, Chim T, Berry I, Bogoch I, Cetron M (2013) Potential for the international spread of middle East respiratory syndrome in association with mass gatherings in saudi arabia. PLoS Currents 5. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.a7b70897ac2fa4f79b59f90d24c860b8 Google Scholar
- 9.Ranse J, Hutton A, Keene T, Lenson S, Luther M, Bost N, Johnston ANB, Crilly J, Cannon M, Jones N, Hayes C, Burke B (2017) Health service impact from mass gatherings: a systematic literature review. Prehospital Disaster Med 32(1):71–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X16001199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Tajfel H, Turner J (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin W, Worehel S (eds) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, pp 33–47Google Scholar
- 18.Turner J, Hogg M, Oakes P, Reicher S, Wetherell M (1987) Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 22.Alnabulsi H, Drury J (2014) Social identification moderates the effect of crowd density on safety at the Hajj. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(25):9091–9096. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404953111
- 25.Drury J (2012) Collective resilience in mass emergencies and disasters: A social identity model. In: Jetten J, Haslam C, Haslam SA (eds) The social cure: Identity, health, and well-being, 1st edn. Psychology Press, London, New York, pp 195–216Google Scholar
- 26.Vezzali L, Drury J, Versari A, Cadamuro A (2016) Sharing distress increases helping and contact intentions via social identification and inclusion of the other in the self: Children’s prosocial behaviour after an earthquake. Group Process Intergroup Relat 19(3):314–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215590492 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016) Causes of death, Australia, 2016. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/3303.0~2016~Main%20Features~Intentional%20self-harm:%20key%20characteristics~7. Accessed 31 Jan 2018
- 32.Irwin K, Hutton A, Hill P (2015) Parental concern for their adolescent attending Schoolies: a literature review. Neonatal Paediatr Child Health Nurs 18(3):2–7Google Scholar
- 39.Salom C, Watts M, Kinner S, Young D (2005) Schoolies week in perspective: studies of alcohol, drug and risk-taking behaviour. Of Subst Natl Mag Alcohol Tobacco Other Drugs 3(1):26–28Google Scholar
- 40.Smith AMA, Rosenthal D (1997) Sex, alcohol and drugs? Young people’s experience of Schoolies Week. Aust N Z J Public Health 21(2):175–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.1997.tb01679.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012) Information paper: Use of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale in ABS health surveys, Australia, 2007-08. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4817.0.55.001Chapter12007-08. Accessed 31 Jan 2018
- 47.Bodimeade H, Anderson E, La Macchia S, Smith JR, Terry DJ, Louis WR (2014) Testing the direct, indirect, and interactive roles of referent group injunctive and descriptive norms for sun protection in relation to the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 44(11):739–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016) Census of population and housing: Socioeconomic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA). Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/2033.0.55.0012011?OpenDocument. Accessed 31 Jan 2018
- 51.Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): volume 5—remoteness structure. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/1270.0.55.005July%202011
- 52.Mission Australia (2017) Youth mental health report: Youth survey 2012–2016. Mission Australia in collaboration with the Black Dog InstituteGoogle Scholar
- 54.Helliwell JF, Wang S (2010) Trust and Well-being. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 15911. https://doi.org/10.3386/w15911
- 55.Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 57.Haslam SA, Reicher SD, Levine M (2012) When other people are heaven, when other people are hell: How social identity determines the nature and impact of social support. In: Jetten J, Haslam C, Haslam SA (eds) The social cure: Identity, health, and well-being 1st edn. Psychology Press, London, New York, pp 157–174Google Scholar